shaba/systemd-stable
1
1
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/systemd/systemd-stable.git synced 2024-12-25 23:21:33 +03:00
Code
d31dda5e95
systemd-stable/coccinelle/not_in_set.cocci

35 lines
1.0 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

tree-wide: use `!IN_SET(..)` for `a != b && a != c && …` The included cocci was used to generate the changes. Thanks to @flo-wer for pointing this case out.
2017-09-29 10:58:22 +03:00
@@
expression e;
coccinelle: exclude JsonVariant* from the IN_SET transformation JsonVariant* doesn't work with the current IN_SET implementation, so let's exclude it from the transformation altogether
2019-04-29 14:15:27 +03:00
typedef JsonVariant;
type T != JsonVariant*;
constant T n0, n1, n2, n3, n4, n5, n6, n7, n8, n9;
tree-wide: use `!IN_SET(..)` for `a != b && a != c && …` The included cocci was used to generate the changes. Thanks to @flo-wer for pointing this case out.
2017-09-29 10:58:22 +03:00
@@
coccinelle: exclude JsonVariant* from the IN_SET transformation JsonVariant* doesn't work with the current IN_SET implementation, so let's exclude it from the transformation altogether
2019-04-29 14:15:27 +03:00
(
tree-wide: use `!IN_SET(..)` for `a != b && a != c && …` The included cocci was used to generate the changes. Thanks to @flo-wer for pointing this case out.
2017-09-29 10:58:22 +03:00
- e != n0 && e != n1 && e != n2 && e != n3 && e != n4 && e != n5 && e != n6 && e != n7 && e != n8 && e != n9
+ !IN_SET(e, n0, n1, n2, n3, n4, n5, n6, n7, n8, n9)
coccinelle: exclude JsonVariant* from the IN_SET transformation JsonVariant* doesn't work with the current IN_SET implementation, so let's exclude it from the transformation altogether
2019-04-29 14:15:27 +03:00
|
tree-wide: use `!IN_SET(..)` for `a != b && a != c && …` The included cocci was used to generate the changes. Thanks to @flo-wer for pointing this case out.
2017-09-29 10:58:22 +03:00
- e != n0 && e != n1 && e != n2 && e != n3 && e != n4 && e != n5 && e != n6 && e != n7 && e != n8
+ !IN_SET(e, n0, n1, n2, n3, n4, n5, n6, n7, n8)
coccinelle: exclude JsonVariant* from the IN_SET transformation JsonVariant* doesn't work with the current IN_SET implementation, so let's exclude it from the transformation altogether
2019-04-29 14:15:27 +03:00
|
tree-wide: use `!IN_SET(..)` for `a != b && a != c && …` The included cocci was used to generate the changes. Thanks to @flo-wer for pointing this case out.
2017-09-29 10:58:22 +03:00
- e != n0 && e != n1 && e != n2 && e != n3 && e != n4 && e != n5 && e != n6 && e != n7
+ !IN_SET(e, n0, n1, n2, n3, n4, n5, n6, n7)
coccinelle: exclude JsonVariant* from the IN_SET transformation JsonVariant* doesn't work with the current IN_SET implementation, so let's exclude it from the transformation altogether
2019-04-29 14:15:27 +03:00
|
tree-wide: use `!IN_SET(..)` for `a != b && a != c && …` The included cocci was used to generate the changes. Thanks to @flo-wer for pointing this case out.
2017-09-29 10:58:22 +03:00
- e != n0 && e != n1 && e != n2 && e != n3 && e != n4 && e != n5 && e != n6
+ !IN_SET(e, n0, n1, n2, n3, n4, n5, n6)
coccinelle: exclude JsonVariant* from the IN_SET transformation JsonVariant* doesn't work with the current IN_SET implementation, so let's exclude it from the transformation altogether
2019-04-29 14:15:27 +03:00
|
tree-wide: use `!IN_SET(..)` for `a != b && a != c && …` The included cocci was used to generate the changes. Thanks to @flo-wer for pointing this case out.
2017-09-29 10:58:22 +03:00
- e != n0 && e != n1 && e != n2 && e != n3 && e != n4 && e != n5
+ !IN_SET(e, n0, n1, n2, n3, n4, n5)
coccinelle: exclude JsonVariant* from the IN_SET transformation JsonVariant* doesn't work with the current IN_SET implementation, so let's exclude it from the transformation altogether
2019-04-29 14:15:27 +03:00
|
coccinelle: fix IN_SET/!IN_SET scripts, and apply some changes it found IN_SET only works for constant values, hence clarify that. Moreover, we declared a statement "s" we never made use of. Drop it. Also, for both scripts, let's support 10 items. More causes spatch to die with "Stack overflow" for me.
2017-11-29 15:05:24 +03:00
- e != n0 && e != n1 && e != n2 && e != n3 && e != n4
+ !IN_SET(e, n0, n1, n2, n3, n4)
coccinelle: exclude JsonVariant* from the IN_SET transformation JsonVariant* doesn't work with the current IN_SET implementation, so let's exclude it from the transformation altogether
2019-04-29 14:15:27 +03:00
|
coccinelle: fix IN_SET/!IN_SET scripts, and apply some changes it found IN_SET only works for constant values, hence clarify that. Moreover, we declared a statement "s" we never made use of. Drop it. Also, for both scripts, let's support 10 items. More causes spatch to die with "Stack overflow" for me.
2017-11-29 15:05:24 +03:00
- e != n0 && e != n1 && e != n2 && e != n3
+ !IN_SET(e, n0, n1, n2, n3)
coccinelle: exclude JsonVariant* from the IN_SET transformation JsonVariant* doesn't work with the current IN_SET implementation, so let's exclude it from the transformation altogether
2019-04-29 14:15:27 +03:00
|
coccinelle: fix IN_SET/!IN_SET scripts, and apply some changes it found IN_SET only works for constant values, hence clarify that. Moreover, we declared a statement "s" we never made use of. Drop it. Also, for both scripts, let's support 10 items. More causes spatch to die with "Stack overflow" for me.
2017-11-29 15:05:24 +03:00
- e != n0 && e != n1 && e != n2
+ !IN_SET(e, n0, n1, n2)
coccinelle: exclude JsonVariant* from the IN_SET transformation JsonVariant* doesn't work with the current IN_SET implementation, so let's exclude it from the transformation altogether
2019-04-29 14:15:27 +03:00
|
coccinelle: fix IN_SET/!IN_SET scripts, and apply some changes it found IN_SET only works for constant values, hence clarify that. Moreover, we declared a statement "s" we never made use of. Drop it. Also, for both scripts, let's support 10 items. More causes spatch to die with "Stack overflow" for me.
2017-11-29 15:05:24 +03:00
- e != n0 && e != n1
+ !IN_SET(e, n0, n1)
coccinelle: exclude JsonVariant* from the IN_SET transformation JsonVariant* doesn't work with the current IN_SET implementation, so let's exclude it from the transformation altogether
2019-04-29 14:15:27 +03:00
)
Copy Permalink