mirror of
https://github.com/systemd/systemd-stable.git
synced 2025-02-02 09:47:03 +03:00
units: do not ignore return value from systemd --user
This minus has been there since the unit was added in d42d27ead91e470cb12986d928441e56c0f543ca. I think the idea was not cause things to fail if the user instance doesn't work. But ignoring the return value doesn't seem to be the right way to approach the problem. In particular, if the program fails to run, we'll get a bogus fail state, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1727895#c1: with the minus: $ systemctl start user@1002 Job for user@1002.service failed because the service did not take the steps required by its unit configuration. See "systemctl status user@1002.service" and "journalctl -xe" for details. without the minus: $ systemctl start user@1002 Job for user@1002.service failed because the control process exited with error code. See "systemctl status user@1002.service" and "journalctl -xe" for details.
This commit is contained in:
parent
df883de98a
commit
a3558e7952
@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ IgnoreOnIsolate=yes
|
||||
User=%i
|
||||
PAMName=systemd-user
|
||||
Type=notify
|
||||
ExecStart=-@rootlibexecdir@/systemd --user
|
||||
ExecStart=@rootlibexecdir@/systemd --user
|
||||
Slice=user-%i.slice
|
||||
KillMode=mixed
|
||||
Delegate=pids memory
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user