mirror of
https://github.com/systemd/systemd-stable.git
synced 2024-12-23 17:34:00 +03:00
man: describe "symlink" and "systemctl link" explicitly in UNIT FILE LOAD PATH
There are sometimes users who put unit files in a location that is inaccessible when systemd starts although they are not found and thus not started because the corresponding mount units have not activated yet. There is already a warning for such issue in man 8 systemctl: link PATH... ...<snip>... The file system where the linked unit files are located must be accessible when systemd is started (e.g. anything underneath /home or /var is not allowed, unless those directories are located on the root file system). However, it looks that it's difficult to find the warning because introductory users typically doesn't know systemctl link. Although there is a description in UNIT FILE LOAD PATH pointing to systemctl link, symlink is now not explicitly mentioned there and thus users doesn't easily get aware of they should read it. To deal with this, let's describe "symlink" and "systemctl link" more explicitly in UNIT FILE LOAD PATH.
This commit is contained in:
parent
8ac7339648
commit
b63c88b627
@ -467,10 +467,12 @@
|
||||
<programlisting>systemd-analyze --user unit-paths</programlisting>
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Moreover, additional units might be loaded into systemd ("linked") from
|
||||
directories not on the unit load path. See the <command>link</command> command
|
||||
for
|
||||
<citerefentry><refentrytitle>systemctl</refentrytitle><manvolnum>1</manvolnum></citerefentry>.
|
||||
<para>Moreover, additional units might be loaded into systemd from
|
||||
directories not on the unit load path by creating a symlink pointing to a
|
||||
unit file in the directories. You can use <command>systemctl link</command>
|
||||
for this operation. See
|
||||
<citerefentry><refentrytitle>systemctl</refentrytitle><manvolnum>1</manvolnum></citerefentry>
|
||||
for its usage and precaution.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</refsect1>
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user