1
1
mirror of https://github.com/systemd/systemd-stable.git synced 2024-12-24 21:34:08 +03:00

man: extend man pages a little

This commit is contained in:
Lennart Poettering 2010-07-18 02:11:38 +02:00
parent 246756ca92
commit b9975629f0
3 changed files with 84 additions and 9 deletions

2
fixme
View File

@ -49,8 +49,6 @@
* maintenance units müssen vergessen werden
* maintenance muss dokumentiert werden, ebenso OnStartup= und JobTimeoutSec=
* fingerprint.target, wireless.target, gps.target
* fix merging of device units

View File

@ -398,6 +398,15 @@
place. </para></listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><varname>OnFailure=</varname></term>
<listitem><para>Lists one or more
units that are activated when this
unit fails (i.e. enters maintenance
state).</para></listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><varname>RecursiveStop=</varname></term>
@ -495,6 +504,34 @@
fails the unit will immediately fail
too and the job is removed.</para></listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><varname>JobTimeoutSec=</varname></term>
<listitem><para>When clients are
waiting for a job of this unit to
complete, time out after the specified
time. If this time limit is reached
the job will be cancelled, the unit
however will not change state or even
enter maintenance mode. This value
defaults to 0 (job timeouts disabled),
except for device units. NB: this
timeout is independent from any
unit-specific timeout (for example,
the timeout set with
<varname>Timeout=</varname> in service
units) as the job timeout has no effect
on the unit itself, only on the job
that might be pending for it. Or in
other words: unit-specific timeouts
are useful to abort unit state
changes, and revert them. The job
timeout set with this option however
is useful to abort only the job waiting
for the unit state to change.</para></listitem>
</varlistentry>
</variablelist>
<para>Unit file may include a [Install] section, which

View File

@ -141,7 +141,7 @@
<listitem><para>Tell systemd to run a
system instance (resp. session
instance), even if the process ID is
not 1 (resp. is 1), i.e. system is not
not 1 (resp. is 1), i.e. systemd is not
(resp. is) run as init process.
Normally it should not be necessary to
pass these options, as systemd
@ -232,12 +232,23 @@
<citerefentry><refentrytitle>systemd.unit</refentrytitle><manvolnum>5</manvolnum></citerefentry>,
however some are created automatically from other
configuration or dynamically from system state. Units
may be active (meaning started, bound, plugged in, ...
depending on the unit type), or inactive (meaning
stopped, unbound, unplugged, ...), as well as in the
process of being activated or deactivated,
i.e. between the two states. The following unit types
are available:</para>
may be 'active' (meaning started, bound, plugged in,
... depending on the unit type, see below), or
'inactive' (meaning stopped, unbound, unplugged, ...),
as well as in the process of being activated or
deactivated, i.e. between the two states (these states
are called 'activating', 'deactivating'). A special
'maintenance' state is available as well which is very
similar to 'inactive' and is entered when the service
failed in some way (process returned error code on
exit, or crashed, or an operation timed out). If this
state is entered the cause will be logged, for later
reference. Note that the various unit types may have a
number of additional substates, which are mapped to
the five generalized unit states described
here.</para>
<para>The following unit types are available:</para>
<orderedlist>
<listitem><para>Service units, which control
@ -304,6 +315,35 @@
list you may find in
<citerefentry><refentrytitle>systemd.special</refentrytitle><manvolnum>7</manvolnum></citerefentry>.</para>
<para>systemd knows various kinds of dependencies,
including positive and negative requirement
dependencies (i.e. <varname>Requires=</varname> and
<varname>Conflicts=</varname>) as well as ordering
dependencies (<varname>After=</varname> and
<varname>Before=</varname>). NB: ordering and
requirement dependencies are orthogonal. If only a
requirement dependency exists between two units
(e.g. <filename>foo.service</filename> requires
<filename>bar.service</filename>), but no ordering
dependency (e.g. <filename>foo.service</filename>
after <filename>bar.service</filename>) and both are
requested to start, they will be started in
parallel. It is a common pattern that both requirement
and ordering dependencies are placed between two
units. Also note that the majority of dependencies are
implicitly created and maintained by systemd. In most
cases it should be unnecessary to declare additional
dependencies manually, however it is possible to do
this.</para>
<para>Application programs and units (via
dependencies) may requests state changes of units. In
systemd, these requests are encapsulated as 'jobs' and
maintained in a job queue. Jobs may succeed or can
fail, their execution is ordered based on the ordering
dependencies of the units they have been scheduled
for.</para>
<para>On boot systemd activates the target unit
<filename>default.target</filename> whose job is to
activate on-boot services and other on-boot units by