IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This test exposes a race condition when running in LXC, see issue #11848
for details. Until that is understood and fixed, skip the test as it's
not a recent regression.
This avoids a warning:
An address '192.168.42.100' is specified without prefix length. The
behavior of parsing addresses without prefix length will be changed
in the future release. Please specify prefix length explicitly.
This test case is a bit silly, but it shows that our code is unprepared to
handle so many network servers, with quadratic complexity in various places.
I don't think there are any valid reasons to have hundres of NTP servers
configured, so let's just emit a warning and cut the list short.
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=13354
- This test needs resolved, so make sure it is started. In some Debian
environments it is not.
- It was an unnecessary, and now failing assumption that name servers
get atomically written to the resolved's resolv.conf. Wait until both
expected name servers are in the file.
Since version 241 (commit ea4678?), querying MX type records for
single-label domains does not actually forward the query to the DNS
server any more. Use "example.com" instead, which is the recommended
test domain anyway.
dnsmasq 2.80 changed behaviour when being queried by resolved with
enabled DNSSEC: It returns errors for SOA and DS queries which cause the
entire query to fail. As we don't configure DNSSEC in this test anyway,
just disable it so that we retain compatibility with old and new dnsmasq
versions.
The test was failing in Ubuntu CI with a 30s timeout. It makes
sense to keep the file so exercise the set allocation logic, but
we can make it shorter.
We were already using OrderedSets in the manager object, but strvs in the
configuration parsing code. Using sets gives us better scaling when many
domains are used.
In oss-fuzz #13059 the attached reproducer takes approximately 30.5 s to be
parsed. Converting to sets makes this go down to 10s. This is not _vastly_
faster, but using sets seems like a nicer approach anyway. In particular, we
avoid the quadratic de-unification operation after each addition.
