IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This parameter allows configuring the activation policy for an interface,
meaning how it manages the interface's administrative state (IFF_UP flag).
The policy can be configured to bring the interface either up or down when
the interface is (re)configured, to always force the interface either up or
down, or to never change the interface administrative state.
If the interface is bound with BindCarrier=, its administrative state is
controlled by the interface(s) it's bound to, and this parameter is forced
to 'bound'.
This changes the default behavior of how systemd-networkd sets the IFF_UP
flag; previously, it was set up (if not already up) every time the
link_joined() function was called. Now, with the default ActivationPolicy=
setting of 'up', it will only set the IFF_UP flag once, the first time
link_joined() is called, during an interface's configuration; and on
the first link_joined() call each time the interface is reconfigured.
Fixes: #3031Fixes: #17437
Enhance systemd-networkd to be able to control a CAN device's berr-reporting
flag via the new boolean directive BusErrorReporting= to be used in network
files.
Allow configuration for IPv6 discovered routes to be ignored instead of
adding them as a route. This can be used to block unwanted routes, for
example, you may wish to not receive some set of routes on an interface
if they are causing issues.
They are not really boolean, because we have both ipv4 and ipv6, but
for each protocol we have either unset, no, and yes.
From https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/13316#issuecomment-582906817:
LinkLocalAddressing must be a boolean option, at least for ipv4:
- LinkLocalAddressing=no => no LL at all.
- LinkLocalAddressing=yes + Static Address => invalid configuration, warn and
interpret as LinkLocalAddressing=no, no LL at all.
(we check that during parsing and reject)
- LinkLocalAddressing=yes + DHCP => LL process should be subordinated to the
DHCP one, an LL address must be acquired at start or after a short N
unsuccessful DHCP attemps, and must not stop DHCP to keeping trying. When a
DHCP address is acquired, drop the LL address. If the DHCP address is lost,
re-adquire a new LL address.
(next patch will move in this direction)
- LinkLocalAddressing=fallback has no reason to exist, because LL address must
always be allocated as a fallback option when using DHCP. Having both DHCP
and LL address at the same time is an RFC violation, so
LinkLocalAdressing=yes correctly implemented is already the "fallback"
behavior. The fallback option must be deprecated and if present in older
configs must be interpreted as LinkLocalAddressing=yes.
(removed)
- And for IPv6, the LinkLocalAddress option has any sense at all? IPv6-LL
address aren't required to be always set for every IPv6 enabled interface (in
this case, coexisting with static or dynamic address if any)? Shouldn't be
always =yes?
(good question)
This effectively reverts 29e81083bd2fcb2dbf83f67ef358c7d25adf7e9d. There is no
special "fallback" mode now, so the check doesn't make sense anymore.
Follow-up for ac24e418d9bc988ecf114c464701b35934948178.
The original motivation of the commit and RFE #15339 is to start dhcpv6
client in managed mode when neither M nor O flag is set in the RA.
But, previously, if the setting is set to "always", then the DHCPv6
client is always started in managed mode even if O flag is set in the
RA. Such the behavior breaks RFC 7084.
99e015e28c8322bf714f45cd1defcf20ac2103c5 missed to update the example
below - DHCPv6.AssignAcquiredDelegatedPrefixAddress was moved to
DHCPv6PrefixDelegation.Assign.
As it already defaulted to true since it's introduction in
9efa8a3cff9948d3a78597b74dca75c805716de4, there's no need to explicitly
list it at all.
For users, the square brackets already serve as markup and clearly delineate
the section name from surrounding text. Putting additional markup around that
only adds clutter. Also, we were very inconsistent in using the quotes. Let's
just drop them altogether.
