IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
* sd-bus/man: document EBUSY error in bus_message_read
The EBUSY error can be returned from sd_bus_exit_container(), and, if
that happens, it will be propogated upwards towards bus_message_read. In
terms of documentation, this means that bus_message_read's man page
can't just include the error text for sd_bus_message_read_basic, as
reading basic types exclusively doesn't have the potential for this
error.
sd_bus_message_read_basic's error documentation isn't incorrect when
applied to sd_bus_message_read, it's just incomplete. While EBUSY is
documented in sd_bus_message_open_container.xml,
it's explanation is unique to the sd_bus_message_exit_container function
and makes for poor documentation of the general read API.
(cherry picked from commit a1a03fa54b)
Also fixes the following:
- IPServiceType= is moved to [DHCPv4] section,
- drop an incorrect sentence in RouteMTUBytes= in [DHCPv4] section.
- drop unnecessary word 'unsigned'.
Fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006761:
> systemd-resolved always (reverse)-resolves the host's IP addresses and FQDN.
> This can be harmful when an application (for instance, a DNS zone manager) is
> installed on the same server instance. That application would expect
> NXDOMAIN to be returned if the current server's IP does not belong in an
> already managed reverse zone.
This allows clients of nss-resolve to use the same config options that are
available through the dbus api and as command-line options to resolvectl.
The man page text is is mostly copied directly from
c6f20515ab.
Spotted whilst debugging:
```
[763/2094] Generating man/machine-info.html with a custom command
Element cite in namespace '' encountered in para, but no template matches.
[765/2094] Generating man/machine-info.5 with a custom command
Element cite in namespace '' encountered in para, but no template matches.
```
Follow-up to 357376d0bb.
Now that kernel-install creates the machine-id directory, we don't need to do
this is 'bootctl install', and in fact it's better not to do this since it
might never be necessary. So let's change the default behaviour to 'no'.
I kept support for 'auto' to maintain backwards compatibility, even though the
default was changed. Previous behaviour can be requested by specifying
--make-machine-id-directory=auto.
341890de86 made "bootctl install" create
ESP\MID, in preparation of cf73f65089 that
followed it and created 00-entry-directory.install to make ESP\MID\KVER
if ESP\MID existed ‒ this meant that "bootctl install" followed by
"kernel-install $(uname -r) /boot/vml*$(uname -r) /boot/ini*$(uname -r)"
actually installed the kernel correctly.
Later, 31e57550b5 reverted the first
commit, meaning, that now running those two commands first installs
sd-boot, but then does nothing. Everything appears to work right,
nothing errors out, but no changes are actually done. To the untrained
eye (all of them), even running with -v appears to work:
all the hooks are run, as is depmod, but, again, nothing happens.
This is horrible. Nothing in either manpage suggests what to do
(nor should it, really), but the user is left with a bootloader that
appears fully funxional, since nothing suggests a failure in the output,
but with an unbootable machine, /no way to boot it/, even if they drop
to an EFI shell, since the boot bundle isn't present on the ESP,
and no real recourse even if they boot into a recovery system,
apart from installing like GRUB or whatever.
00- is purely instrumentation for 90-,
and separating one from the other has led to downstream dissatisfaxion
(indeed, the last mentioned commit cited cited exactly that as the
reversion reason), while creating $ENTRY_DIR_ABS is only required
for bootloaders using the BLS, and shouldn't itself toggle anything.
To that end, introduce an /{e,l}/k/install.conf file that allows
overriding the detected layout, and detect it as "bls" if
$BOOT_ROOT/$MACHINE_ID ($ENTRY_DIR_ABS/..) exists, otherwise "other" ‒
if a user wishes to select a different bootloader,
like GRUB, they (or, indeed, the postinst script) can specify
layout=grub. This disables 90- and $ENTRY_DIR_ABS manipulation.
If KERNEL_INSTALL_MACHINE_ID is defined in /etc/machine-info, prefer it
over the machine ID from /etc/machine-id. If a machine ID is defined in
neither /etc/machine-info nor in /etc/machine-id, generate a new UUID
and try to write it to /etc/machine-info as KERNEL_INSTALL_MACHINE_ID
and use it as the machine ID if writing it to /etc/machine-info succeeds.
In practice, this means we have a more robust fallback if there's no
machine ID in /etc/machine-id than just using "Default" and allows
image builders to force kernel-install to use KERNEL_INSTALL_MACHINE_ID
by simply writing it to /etc/machine-info themselves.
The ordering of the service wrt. to udevd is enforced by unit configuration,
so no need to tell the user about this. From users' POV, the only thing that
counts is that the unit is enabled and then the right thing happens.
This description will help users who are trying to reset the already configured
CPUQuota= by trying incorrect ways such as CPUQuota=0 or CPUQUota=infinity.
Some types of credentials that a user would want to pass
into the initrd do not depend on the specific kernel/initrd
version. For instance, this can include SSH keys, rootfs
encryption keys, dm-integrity keys, and so on. This
introduces a directory where such credentials can be placed
so that any kernel image will load them
if /usr/lib/systemd/boot/efi/systemd-bootx64.efi.signed exists
install that instead of /usr/lib/systemd/boot/efi/systemd-bootx64.efi
the idea is that SecureBoot tooling can create the efi.signed file
whenever /usr/lib/systemd/boot/efi/systemd-bootx64.efi from the package
is updated.
Confer https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/19006#issuecomment-800234022:
On some systems it's the admin's explicit choice not to to have the
machine ID leak into the ESP
On some systems the machine ID is transient, generated at every boot,
and hence should not be written to the ESP
