IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
We would describe tmpfiles.d through what systemd-tmpfiles does with them, but
I think it's better to start with a geneneral statement what they are. Also,
let's make the description of volatile file systems less prominent.
Also, strenghten the advice to use RuntimeDirectory and mention
{Cache,Logs,Configuration,State}Directory=.
I think it is OK if some option is described as "similar to ..., but in
addition ...", as long as the "in addition" part is strictly additive this is
unambiguous. Otherwise, we'd have to repeat a lot of text, and then we'd
probably forget to adjust some of the descriptions when doing changes.
But when the "in addition" part is about replacing or removing parts of
functionality, it is better to avoid this pattern and describe the later option
from scratch.
Some paragraph breaks are added and minor changes made. UID/GID is changed to
user/group, since we generally expect user/group names to be used, not numeric
ids.
Fixes#11115.
Before:
Assertion 'mknod(devname, mode, devnum) == 0' failed at ../src/test/test-udev.c:116, function run(). Aborting.
Assertion 'unlink(devname) == 0' failed at ../src/test/test-udev.c:118, function run(). Aborting.
After:
mknod() failed for '/dev/sda': Operation not permitted
unlink('/dev/sda') failed: No such file or directory
cg_ns_supported() caches, so the condition was really checked just once, but
it looks weird to assign the return value to arg_use_cgns (if the variable is not present),
because then the other checks are effectively equivalent to
if (cg_ns_supported() && cg_ns_supported()) { ...
and later
if (!cg_ns_supported() || !cg_ns_supported()) { ...
This imports the wiki page for predictable interface names. I think it's
useful to preserve history here because it's a contentious subject, and
it's useful to know when what happened.
