IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
It's not entirely impossible to screw something up playing with
kernel modules on a Saturday evening :-) This PR fixes a scenario
where a module has been loaded into the kernel but the module itself
has been removed from the disk.
```
$ lsmod | grep wireg
wireguard 225280 0
ip6_udp_tunnel 16384 1 wireguard
udp_tunnel 16384 1 wireguard
$ modprobe wireguard
modprobe: FATAL: Module wireguard not found in directory /lib/modules/4.18.16-200.fc28.x86_64
$ sudo ./systemd-networkd-tests.py NetworkdNetDevTests.test_wireguard
...
modprobe: FATAL: Module wireguard not found in directory /lib/modules/4.18.16-200.fc28.x86_64
test_wireguard (__main__.NetworkdNetDevTests) ... unexpected success
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 1 test in 5.152s
FAILED (unexpected successes=1)
```
This is a follow-up to https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/10625.
After ec6a47044a2ab321ae6427ce0d9fa3f6a17544a8, networkd starts
soon after removing links used by previous test. That causes
some racy situation of removing links and detecting links by networkd.
I went through my antique collection of fuzzers the other day
to see which ones I hadn't sent upstream yet. This one
seems to be nice to have and ready to be merged. As far as I can
tell, it hasn't managed to find anything useful yet,
but it's better to be safe than sorry especially when it comes to networking
code :-)
Currently, if I run the full "run-integration-tests.sh" script it will
fail on my machine because it fills up /var/tmp whith just too much
crap until the disk is full.
Let's make sure that "run-integration-tests.sh" cleans up after every
test. For that change the make targets to run from "clean setup run" to
"clean setup run clean" — except that that doesn't work since make is
smart enough to realize that the same target appears twice on the
command line and will only execute it once. Let's fix that by defining
another target "clean-again" which is just like "clean", but allows us
to be added to the same command line a second time. Then, let's build
with "clean setup run clean-again" and all is good.
While we are at it, let's also add .PHONY where appropriate, after all
these all are phony targets.
Add LogRateLimitIntervalSec= and LogRateLimitBurst= options for
services. If provided, these values get passed to the journald
client context, and those values are used in the rate limiting
function in the journal over the the journald.conf values.
Part of #10230
Those interfaces are created automatically when ip6_tunnel and ip6_gre loaded.
They break the test with exec-privatenetwork-yes.service.
C.f. 6b08180ca6f1ceb913f6a69ffcaf96e9818fbdf5.
We would read (-1), and then add 1 to it, call message_peek_body(..., 0, ...),
and when trying to make use of the data.
The fuzzer test case is just for one site, but they all look similar.
v2: fix two UINT8_MAX/UINT32_MAX mismatches founds by LGTM
We copied part of the string into a buffer that was off by two.
If the element signature had length one, we'd copy 0 bytes and crash when
looking at the "first" byte. Otherwise, we would crash because strncpy would
not terminate the string.
This is similar to the grandparent commit 'fix calculation of offsets table',
except that now the change is for array elements. Same story as before: we need
to make sure that the offsets increase enough taking alignment into account.
While at it, rename 'p' to 'previous' to match similar code in other places.
The offsets specify the ends of variable length data. We would trust the
incoming data, putting the offsets specified in our message
into the offsets tables after doing some superficial verification.
But when actually reading the data we apply alignment, so we would take
the previous offset, align it, making it bigger then current offset, and
then we'd try to read data of negative length.
In the attached example, the message specifies the following offsets:
[1, 4]
but the alignment of those items is
[1, 8]
so we'd calculate the second item as starting at 8 and ending at 4.
