shaba/systemd
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/systemd/systemd.git synced 2024-11-01 00:51:24 +03:00
Code
41b88bb8ad
systemd/.packit.yml

48 lines
1.8 KiB
YAML
Raw Normal View History

ci: enable Packit integration Let's enable the Packit integration and see if it's a viable option for us. This configuration builds systemd on Fedora (on x86_64, i386, and aarch64) and runs the unit test suite. To do that, it uses the specfile from Fedora Rawhide[0] with some minor modifications, thus dropping the need to have a specfile in the upstream repository. So far the builds took around 25 minutes each, so speed-wise it's pretty good. The two remaining supported architectures (s390x and armhfp) are excluded, for now, since they're emulated and build there takes a really long time (~4 hours). [0] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/systemd/
2020-03-19 13:37:41 +03:00
---
# vi:ts=2 sw=2 et:
#
# Docs: https://packit.dev/docs/
specfile_path: .packit_rpm/systemd.spec
synced_files:
- .packit.yaml
- src: .packit_rpm/systemd.spec
dest: systemd.spec
upstream_package_name: systemd
downstream_package_name: systemd
# `git describe` returns in systemd's case 'v245-xxx' which breaks RPM version
ci: build the Fedora RPMs with -Werror
2021-01-29 00:27:18 +03:00
# detection (that expects 245-xxxx'). Let's tweak the version string accordingly
ci: enable Packit integration Let's enable the Packit integration and see if it's a viable option for us. This configuration builds systemd on Fedora (on x86_64, i386, and aarch64) and runs the unit test suite. To do that, it uses the specfile from Fedora Rawhide[0] with some minor modifications, thus dropping the need to have a specfile in the upstream repository. So far the builds took around 25 minutes each, so speed-wise it's pretty good. The two remaining supported architectures (s390x and armhfp) are excluded, for now, since they're emulated and build there takes a really long time (~4 hours). [0] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/systemd/
2020-03-19 13:37:41 +03:00
upstream_tag_template: "v{version}"
actions:
post-upstream-clone:
# Use the Fedora Rawhide specfile
- "git clone https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/systemd .packit_rpm --depth=1"
# Drop backported patches from the specfile, but keep the downstream-only ones
# - Patch0000-0499: backported patches from upstream
# - Patch0500-9999: downstream-only patches
- "sed -ri '/^Patch0[0-4][0-9]{2}+\\:.+\\.patch/d' .packit_rpm/systemd.spec"
ci: build with -Werror on Fedora Prompted by: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/18400#issuecomment-771602705
2021-02-02 19:02:12 +03:00
# Build the RPMs with -Werror to catch possible compiler warnings. Since
# --werror in meson doesn't seem to work with -Db_lto=true [0], let's use
# -Dc_args= and -Dcpp_args= instead.
#
# Exceptions:
# - use -Wno-deprecated-declarations to get around mallinfo() use in
# basic/selinux-util.c
# - don't use -Werror on x86 architectures, otherwise all function checks
# will fail (with error: cast from pointer to integer of different size)
#
# [0] https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/issues/7360
- 'sed -i "/^CONFIGURE_OPTS=(/a%ifnarch i386 i686\n-Dc_args=\"-Werror -Wno-deprecated-declarations\" -Dcpp_args=\"-Werror -Wno-deprecated-declarations\"\n%endif" .packit_rpm/systemd.spec'
ci: enable Packit integration Let's enable the Packit integration and see if it's a viable option for us. This configuration builds systemd on Fedora (on x86_64, i386, and aarch64) and runs the unit test suite. To do that, it uses the specfile from Fedora Rawhide[0] with some minor modifications, thus dropping the need to have a specfile in the upstream repository. So far the builds took around 25 minutes each, so speed-wise it's pretty good. The two remaining supported architectures (s390x and armhfp) are excluded, for now, since they're emulated and build there takes a really long time (~4 hours). [0] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/systemd/
2020-03-19 13:37:41 +03:00
jobs:
- job: copr_build
trigger: pull_request
metadata:
targets:
- fedora-rawhide-aarch64
- fedora-rawhide-i386
- fedora-rawhide-x86_64
ci: build on Fedora ELN as well ELN builds with a slightly different content set and RHEL-like options, which should, theoretically, help a bit with RHEL stuff.
2021-02-10 17:06:40 +03:00
- fedora-eln-aarch64
- fedora-eln-x86_64
Copy Permalink