1
0
mirror of https://github.com/systemd/systemd.git synced 2025-01-26 14:04:03 +03:00

[PATCH] "symlink only" test

Here is a test for the "symlink only" rule.

Any reason to do the apply_format() inside the loop?
I've changed it.
This commit is contained in:
kay.sievers@vrfy.org 2004-03-11 01:39:53 -08:00 committed by Greg KH
parent 558f80ba64
commit 0a5417a0eb
2 changed files with 16 additions and 10 deletions

View File

@ -815,16 +815,11 @@ int namedev_name_device(struct sysfs_class_device *class_dev, struct udevice *ud
}
if (dev->symlink[0] != '\0') {
char temp[NAME_MAX];
info("configured rule in '%s' at line %i applied, added symlink '%s'",
dev->config_file, dev->config_line, dev->symlink);
/* do not clobber dev */
strfieldcpy(temp, dev->symlink);
apply_format(udev, temp, sizeof(temp),
class_dev, sysfs_device);
strfieldcat(udev->symlink, temp);
strfieldcat(udev->symlink, " ");
if (udev->symlink[0] != '\0')
strfieldcat(udev->symlink, " ");
strfieldcat(udev->symlink, dev->symlink);
}
if (dev->name[0] != '\0') {
@ -841,8 +836,8 @@ int namedev_name_device(struct sysfs_class_device *class_dev, struct udevice *ud
goto done;
found:
apply_format(udev, udev->name, sizeof(udev->name),
class_dev, sysfs_device);
apply_format(udev, udev->name, sizeof(udev->name), class_dev, sysfs_device);
apply_format(udev, udev->symlink, sizeof(udev->symlink), class_dev, sysfs_device);
udev->partitions = dev->partitions;
done:

View File

@ -511,6 +511,17 @@ EOF
conf => <<EOF
BUS="scsi", SYSFS{whitespace_test}="WHITE SPACE ", NAME="wrong-to-ignore"
BUS="scsi", SYSFS{whitespace_test}="WHITE SPACE ", NAME="matched-with-space"
EOF
},
{
desc => "SYMLINK only rule",
subsys => "block",
devpath => "block/sda",
expected => "symlink-only2",
conf => <<EOF
BUS="scsi", KERNEL="sda", SYMLINK="symlink-only1"
BUS="scsi", KERNEL="sda", SYMLINK="symlink-only2"
BUS="scsi", KERNEL="sda", NAME="link", SYMLINK="symlink0"
EOF
},
);