shaba/systemd
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/systemd/systemd.git synced 2024-12-22 17:35:35 +03:00
Code

docs: make clear that if you use threaded cgroups you need to do that two levels down from your delegated cgroup

Browse Source 
Prompted by: #22486
This commit is contained in:
Lennart Poettering 2022-02-14 18:05:31 +01:00 committed by Luca Boccassi
parent d74da762a3
commit 1d7150ec7f
1 changed files with 9 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

9
docs/CGROUP_DELEGATION.md
View File

@ -266,6 +266,15 @@ tree by the time it notifies the service manager about start-up readiness, so
that the service's main cgroup is definitely an inner node by the time the
service manager might start `ExecStartPost=`.)
(Also note, if you intend to use "threaded" cgroups — as added in Linux 4.14 —,
then you should do that *two* levels down from the main service cgroup your
turned delegation on for. Why that? You need one level so that systemd can
properly create the `.control` subgroup, as described above. But that one
cannot be threaded, since that would mean `.control` has to be threaded too —
this is a requirement of threaded cgroups: either a cgroup and all its siblings
are threaded or none –, but systemd expects it to be a regular cgroup. Thus you
have to nest a second cgroup beneath it which then can be threaded.)
## Three Scenarios
Let's say you write a container manager, and you wonder what to do regarding