mirror of
https://github.com/systemd/systemd.git
synced 2025-03-25 18:50:18 +03:00
man: document distinction between ConditionXYZ= and AssertXYZ=
References: #2468
This commit is contained in:
parent
6e004630fe
commit
41448597f2
@ -827,13 +827,14 @@
|
||||
useful and probably just
|
||||
confusing. -->
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem><para>Before starting a unit verify that the
|
||||
specified condition is true. If it is not true, the starting
|
||||
of the unit will be skipped, however all ordering dependencies
|
||||
of it are still respected. A failing condition will not result
|
||||
in the unit being moved into a failure state. The condition is
|
||||
checked at the time the queued start job is to be
|
||||
executed.</para>
|
||||
<listitem><para>Before starting a unit, verify that the specified condition is true. If it is not true, the
|
||||
starting of the unit will be (mostly silently) skipped, however all ordering dependencies of it are still
|
||||
respected. A failing condition will not result in the unit being moved into a failure state. The condition is
|
||||
checked at the time the queued start job is to be executed. Use condition expressions in order to silently skip
|
||||
units that do not apply to the local running system, for example because the kernel or runtime environment
|
||||
doesn't require its functionality. Use the various <varname>AssertArchitecture=</varname>,
|
||||
<varname>AssertVirtualization=</varname>, … options for a similar mechanism that puts the unit in a failure
|
||||
state and logs about the failed check (see below).</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para><varname>ConditionArchitecture=</varname> may be used to
|
||||
check whether the system is running on a specific
|
||||
@ -1067,14 +1068,12 @@
|
||||
<term><varname>AssertFileNotEmpty=</varname></term>
|
||||
<term><varname>AssertFileIsExecutable=</varname></term>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem><para>Similar to the
|
||||
<varname>ConditionArchitecture=</varname>,
|
||||
<varname>ConditionVirtualization=</varname>, etc., condition
|
||||
settings described above, these settings add assertion checks
|
||||
to the start-up of the unit. However, unlike the conditions
|
||||
settings, any assertion setting that is not met results in
|
||||
failure of the start job it was triggered
|
||||
by.</para></listitem>
|
||||
<listitem><para>Similar to the <varname>ConditionArchitecture=</varname>,
|
||||
<varname>ConditionVirtualization=</varname>, …, condition settings described above, these settings add
|
||||
assertion checks to the start-up of the unit. However, unlike the conditions settings, any assertion setting
|
||||
that is not met results in failure of the start job it was triggered by (which means this is logged about
|
||||
loudly). Use assertion expressions for units that cannot operate when specific requirements are not met, and
|
||||
where this is something the administrator or user should look into.</para></listitem>
|
||||
</varlistentry>
|
||||
|
||||
<varlistentry>
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user