mirror of
https://github.com/systemd/systemd.git
synced 2025-01-12 13:18:14 +03:00
[PATCH] update the FAQ with info about bad modprobe events from the devfs scheme...
This commit is contained in:
parent
6662694809
commit
470e365d53
6
FAQ
6
FAQ
@ -44,6 +44,12 @@ A: Such a functionality isn't needed on a properly configured system. All
|
||||
hardware in memory, then use something else to manage your modules
|
||||
(scripts, modules.conf, etc.) This is not a task for udev.
|
||||
|
||||
Q: But I love that feature of devfs, please?
|
||||
A: The devfs approach caused a lot of spurious modprobe attempts as
|
||||
programs probed to see if devices were present or not. Every probe
|
||||
attempt created a process to run modprobe, almost all of which were
|
||||
spurious.
|
||||
|
||||
Q: I really like the devfs naming scheme, will udev do that?
|
||||
A: Yes, udev can create /dev nodes using the devfs naming policy. A
|
||||
configuration file needs to be created to map the kernel default names
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user