mirror of
https://github.com/systemd/systemd.git
synced 2024-12-25 01:34:28 +03:00
manager: when two pending jobs conflict, keep the one that "conflicts", remove the one that is "conflicted"
This gives the writer of units control which unit is kept and which is stopped when two units conflict.
This commit is contained in:
parent
6e98720f14
commit
69dd2852bb
2
fixme
2
fixme
@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
|
||||
* dot output for --test for 'initial description'
|
||||
|
||||
* conflicted-by: to have a defined winner for conflicts:
|
||||
|
||||
* check 'disable'
|
||||
<Viking-Ice> "Warning: Unit file changed in disk, 'systemctl --system daemon-reload' recomended
|
||||
<kay> when does it do that?
|
||||
|
@ -336,7 +336,22 @@
|
||||
independent of and orthogonal to the
|
||||
<varname>After=</varname> and
|
||||
<varname>Before=</varname> ordering
|
||||
dependencies.</para></listitem>
|
||||
dependencies.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>If a unit A that conflicts with
|
||||
a unit B is scheduled to be started at
|
||||
the same time as B, the transaction
|
||||
will either fail (in case both are
|
||||
required part of the transaction) or
|
||||
be modified to be fixed (in case one
|
||||
or both jobs are not a required part
|
||||
of the transaction). In the latter
|
||||
case the job that is not the required
|
||||
will be removed, or in case both are
|
||||
not required the unit that conflicts
|
||||
will be started and the unit that is
|
||||
conflicted is
|
||||
stopped.</para></listitem>
|
||||
</varlistentry>
|
||||
|
||||
<varlistentry>
|
||||
|
@ -166,9 +166,27 @@
|
||||
<listitem><para>Ask for confirmation when spawning processes. This switch has no effect when run as session instance.</para></listitem>
|
||||
</varlistentry>
|
||||
<varlistentry>
|
||||
<term><option>--show-status</option></term>
|
||||
<term><option>--show-status=</option></term>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem><para>Show terse service status information while booting. This switch has no effect when run as session instance.</para></listitem>
|
||||
<listitem><para>Show terse service
|
||||
status information while booting. This
|
||||
switch has no effect when run as
|
||||
session instance. Takes a boolean
|
||||
argument which may be omitted
|
||||
which is interpreted as
|
||||
<option>true</option>.</para></listitem>
|
||||
</varlistentry>
|
||||
<varlistentry>
|
||||
<term><option>--sysv-console=</option></term>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem><para>Controls whether
|
||||
output of SysV init scripts will be
|
||||
directed to the console. This switch
|
||||
has no effect when run as session
|
||||
instance. Takes a boolean argument
|
||||
which may be omitted which is
|
||||
interpreted as
|
||||
<option>true</option>.</para></listitem>
|
||||
</varlistentry>
|
||||
<varlistentry>
|
||||
<term><option>--log-target=</option></term>
|
||||
@ -805,18 +823,6 @@
|
||||
units.</para></listitem>
|
||||
</varlistentry>
|
||||
|
||||
<varlistentry>
|
||||
<term><varname>systemd.log_target=</varname></term>
|
||||
<term><varname>systemd.log_level=</varname></term>
|
||||
<term><varname>systemd.log_color=</varname></term>
|
||||
<term><varname>systemd.log_location=</varname></term>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem><para>Controls log output,
|
||||
with the same effect as the
|
||||
<varname>$SYSTEMD_LOG_TARGET</varname>, <varname>$SYSTEMD_LOG_LEVEL</varname>, <varname>$SYSTEMD_LOG_COLOR</varname>, <varname>$SYSTEMD_LOG_LOCATION</varname>
|
||||
environment variables described above.</para></listitem>
|
||||
</varlistentry>
|
||||
|
||||
<varlistentry>
|
||||
<term><varname>systemd.dump_core=</varname></term>
|
||||
|
||||
@ -852,6 +858,16 @@
|
||||
<literal>-1</literal>.</para></listitem>
|
||||
</varlistentry>
|
||||
|
||||
<varlistentry>
|
||||
<term><varname>systemd.confirm_spawn=</varname></term>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem><para>Takes a boolean
|
||||
argument. If <option>true</option>
|
||||
asks for confirmation when spawning
|
||||
processes. Defaults to
|
||||
<option>false</option>.</para></listitem>
|
||||
</varlistentry>
|
||||
|
||||
<varlistentry>
|
||||
<term><varname>systemd.show_status=</varname></term>
|
||||
|
||||
@ -862,6 +878,32 @@
|
||||
<option>true</option>.</para></listitem>
|
||||
</varlistentry>
|
||||
|
||||
<varlistentry>
|
||||
<term><varname>systemd.sysv_console=</varname></term>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem><para>Takes a boolean
|
||||
argument. If <option>true</option>
|
||||
output of SysV init scripts will be
|
||||
directed to the console. Defaults to
|
||||
<option>true</option>, unless
|
||||
<option>quiet</option> is passed as
|
||||
kernel command line option in which
|
||||
case it defaults to
|
||||
<option>false</option>.</para></listitem>
|
||||
</varlistentry>
|
||||
|
||||
<varlistentry>
|
||||
<term><varname>systemd.log_target=</varname></term>
|
||||
<term><varname>systemd.log_level=</varname></term>
|
||||
<term><varname>systemd.log_color=</varname></term>
|
||||
<term><varname>systemd.log_location=</varname></term>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem><para>Controls log output,
|
||||
with the same effect as the
|
||||
<varname>$SYSTEMD_LOG_TARGET</varname>, <varname>$SYSTEMD_LOG_LEVEL</varname>, <varname>$SYSTEMD_LOG_COLOR</varname>, <varname>$SYSTEMD_LOG_LOCATION</varname>
|
||||
environment variables described above.</para></listitem>
|
||||
</varlistentry>
|
||||
|
||||
</variablelist>
|
||||
</refsect1>
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static int automount_add_default_dependencies(Automount *a) {
|
||||
if ((r = unit_add_dependency_by_name(UNIT(a), UNIT_AFTER, SPECIAL_FSCK_TARGET, NULL, true)) < 0)
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
|
||||
if ((r = unit_add_two_dependencies_by_name(UNIT(a), UNIT_BEFORE, UNIT_CONFLICTS, SPECIAL_UMOUNT_TARGET, NULL, true)) < 0)
|
||||
if ((r = unit_add_two_dependencies_by_name(UNIT(a), UNIT_BEFORE, UNIT_CONFLICTED_BY, SPECIAL_UMOUNT_TARGET, NULL, true)) < 0)
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -70,6 +70,7 @@
|
||||
" <property name=\"RequiredByOverridable\" type=\"as\" access=\"read\"/>\n" \
|
||||
" <property name=\"WantedBy\" type=\"as\" access=\"read\"/>\n" \
|
||||
" <property name=\"Conflicts\" type=\"as\" access=\"read\"/>\n" \
|
||||
" <property name=\"ConflictedBy\" type=\"as\" access=\"read\"/>\n" \
|
||||
" <property name=\"Before\" type=\"as\" access=\"read\"/>\n" \
|
||||
" <property name=\"After\" type=\"as\" access=\"read\"/>\n" \
|
||||
" <property name=\"OnFailure\" type=\"as\" access=\"read\"/>\n" \
|
||||
@ -108,6 +109,7 @@
|
||||
{ "org.freedesktop.systemd1.Unit", "RequiredByOverridable",bus_unit_append_dependencies, "as", u->meta.dependencies[UNIT_REQUIRED_BY_OVERRIDABLE] }, \
|
||||
{ "org.freedesktop.systemd1.Unit", "WantedBy", bus_unit_append_dependencies, "as", u->meta.dependencies[UNIT_WANTED_BY] }, \
|
||||
{ "org.freedesktop.systemd1.Unit", "Conflicts", bus_unit_append_dependencies, "as", u->meta.dependencies[UNIT_CONFLICTS] }, \
|
||||
{ "org.freedesktop.systemd1.Unit", "ConflictedBy", bus_unit_append_dependencies, "as", u->meta.dependencies[UNIT_CONFLICTED_BY] }, \
|
||||
{ "org.freedesktop.systemd1.Unit", "Before", bus_unit_append_dependencies, "as", u->meta.dependencies[UNIT_BEFORE] }, \
|
||||
{ "org.freedesktop.systemd1.Unit", "After", bus_unit_append_dependencies, "as", u->meta.dependencies[UNIT_AFTER] }, \
|
||||
{ "org.freedesktop.systemd1.Unit", "OnFailure", bus_unit_append_dependencies, "as", u->meta.dependencies[UNIT_ON_FAILURE] }, \
|
||||
|
11
src/job.c
11
src/job.c
@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ void job_free(Job *j) {
|
||||
free(j);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
JobDependency* job_dependency_new(Job *subject, Job *object, bool matters) {
|
||||
JobDependency* job_dependency_new(Job *subject, Job *object, bool matters, bool conflicts) {
|
||||
JobDependency *l;
|
||||
|
||||
assert(object);
|
||||
@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ JobDependency* job_dependency_new(Job *subject, Job *object, bool matters) {
|
||||
l->subject = subject;
|
||||
l->object = object;
|
||||
l->matters = matters;
|
||||
l->conflicts = conflicts;
|
||||
|
||||
if (subject)
|
||||
LIST_PREPEND(JobDependency, subject, subject->subject_list, l);
|
||||
@ -533,6 +534,14 @@ int job_finish_and_invalidate(Job *j, bool success) {
|
||||
other->meta.job->type == JOB_VERIFY_ACTIVE ||
|
||||
other->meta.job->type == JOB_RELOAD_OR_START))
|
||||
job_finish_and_invalidate(other->meta.job, false);
|
||||
|
||||
SET_FOREACH(other, u->meta.dependencies[UNIT_CONFLICTED_BY], i)
|
||||
if (!other->meta.ignore_dependency_failure &&
|
||||
other->meta.job &&
|
||||
(other->meta.job->type == JOB_START ||
|
||||
other->meta.job->type == JOB_VERIFY_ACTIVE ||
|
||||
other->meta.job->type == JOB_RELOAD_OR_START))
|
||||
job_finish_and_invalidate(other->meta.job, false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ struct JobDependency {
|
||||
LIST_FIELDS(JobDependency, object);
|
||||
|
||||
bool matters;
|
||||
bool conflicts;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
struct Job {
|
||||
@ -121,7 +122,7 @@ Job* job_new(Manager *m, JobType type, Unit *unit);
|
||||
void job_free(Job *job);
|
||||
void job_dump(Job *j, FILE*f, const char *prefix);
|
||||
|
||||
JobDependency* job_dependency_new(Job *subject, Job *object, bool matters);
|
||||
JobDependency* job_dependency_new(Job *subject, Job *object, bool matters, bool conflicts);
|
||||
void job_dependency_free(JobDependency *l);
|
||||
void job_dependency_delete(Job *subject, Job *object, bool *matters);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -715,6 +715,20 @@ static void transaction_merge_and_delete_job(Manager *m, Job *j, Job *other, Job
|
||||
other->object_list = NULL;
|
||||
transaction_delete_job(m, other, true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
static bool job_is_conflicted_by(Job *j) {
|
||||
JobDependency *l;
|
||||
|
||||
assert(j);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Returns true if this job is pulled in by a least one
|
||||
* ConflictedBy dependency. */
|
||||
|
||||
LIST_FOREACH(object, l, j->object_list)
|
||||
if (l->conflicts)
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int delete_one_unmergeable_job(Manager *m, Job *j) {
|
||||
Job *k;
|
||||
@ -738,7 +752,36 @@ static int delete_one_unmergeable_job(Manager *m, Job *j) {
|
||||
|
||||
/* Ok, we found two that conflict, let's see if we can
|
||||
* drop one of them */
|
||||
if (!j->matters_to_anchor)
|
||||
if (!j->matters_to_anchor && !k->matters_to_anchor) {
|
||||
|
||||
/* Both jobs don't matter, so let's
|
||||
* find the one that is smarter to
|
||||
* remove. Let's think positive and
|
||||
* rather remove stops then starts --
|
||||
* except if something is being
|
||||
* stopped because it is conflicted by
|
||||
* another unit in which case we
|
||||
* rather remove the start. */
|
||||
|
||||
log_debug("Looking at job %s/%s conflicted_by=%s", j->unit->meta.id, job_type_to_string(j->type), yes_no(j->type == JOB_STOP && job_is_conflicted_by(j)));
|
||||
log_debug("Looking at job %s/%s conflicted_by=%s", k->unit->meta.id, job_type_to_string(k->type), yes_no(k->type == JOB_STOP && job_is_conflicted_by(k)));
|
||||
|
||||
if (j->type == JOB_STOP) {
|
||||
|
||||
if (job_is_conflicted_by(j))
|
||||
d = k;
|
||||
else
|
||||
d = j;
|
||||
|
||||
} else if (k->type == JOB_STOP) {
|
||||
|
||||
if (job_is_conflicted_by(k))
|
||||
d = j;
|
||||
else
|
||||
d = k;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
} else if (!j->matters_to_anchor)
|
||||
d = j;
|
||||
else if (!k->matters_to_anchor)
|
||||
d = k;
|
||||
@ -1324,6 +1367,7 @@ static int transaction_add_job_and_dependencies(
|
||||
Job *by,
|
||||
bool matters,
|
||||
bool override,
|
||||
bool conflicts,
|
||||
DBusError *e,
|
||||
Job **_ret) {
|
||||
Job *ret;
|
||||
@ -1352,46 +1396,50 @@ static int transaction_add_job_and_dependencies(
|
||||
return -ENOMEM;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Then, add a link to the job. */
|
||||
if (!job_dependency_new(by, ret, matters))
|
||||
if (!job_dependency_new(by, ret, matters, conflicts))
|
||||
return -ENOMEM;
|
||||
|
||||
if (is_new) {
|
||||
/* Finally, recursively add in all dependencies. */
|
||||
if (type == JOB_START || type == JOB_RELOAD_OR_START) {
|
||||
SET_FOREACH(dep, ret->unit->meta.dependencies[UNIT_REQUIRES], i)
|
||||
if ((r = transaction_add_job_and_dependencies(m, JOB_START, dep, ret, true, override, e, NULL)) < 0 && r != -EBADR)
|
||||
if ((r = transaction_add_job_and_dependencies(m, JOB_START, dep, ret, true, override, false, e, NULL)) < 0 && r != -EBADR)
|
||||
goto fail;
|
||||
|
||||
SET_FOREACH(dep, ret->unit->meta.dependencies[UNIT_REQUIRES_OVERRIDABLE], i)
|
||||
if ((r = transaction_add_job_and_dependencies(m, JOB_START, dep, ret, !override, override, e, NULL)) < 0 && r != -EBADR) {
|
||||
if ((r = transaction_add_job_and_dependencies(m, JOB_START, dep, ret, !override, override, false, e, NULL)) < 0 && r != -EBADR) {
|
||||
log_warning("Cannot add dependency job for unit %s, ignoring: %s", dep->meta.id, bus_error(e, r));
|
||||
dbus_error_free(e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
SET_FOREACH(dep, ret->unit->meta.dependencies[UNIT_WANTS], i)
|
||||
if ((r = transaction_add_job_and_dependencies(m, JOB_START, dep, ret, false, false, e, NULL)) < 0) {
|
||||
if ((r = transaction_add_job_and_dependencies(m, JOB_START, dep, ret, false, false, false, e, NULL)) < 0) {
|
||||
log_warning("Cannot add dependency job for unit %s, ignoring: %s", dep->meta.id, bus_error(e, r));
|
||||
dbus_error_free(e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
SET_FOREACH(dep, ret->unit->meta.dependencies[UNIT_REQUISITE], i)
|
||||
if ((r = transaction_add_job_and_dependencies(m, JOB_VERIFY_ACTIVE, dep, ret, true, override, e, NULL)) < 0 && r != -EBADR)
|
||||
if ((r = transaction_add_job_and_dependencies(m, JOB_VERIFY_ACTIVE, dep, ret, true, override, false, e, NULL)) < 0 && r != -EBADR)
|
||||
goto fail;
|
||||
|
||||
SET_FOREACH(dep, ret->unit->meta.dependencies[UNIT_REQUISITE_OVERRIDABLE], i)
|
||||
if ((r = transaction_add_job_and_dependencies(m, JOB_VERIFY_ACTIVE, dep, ret, !override, override, e, NULL)) < 0 && r != -EBADR) {
|
||||
if ((r = transaction_add_job_and_dependencies(m, JOB_VERIFY_ACTIVE, dep, ret, !override, override, false, e, NULL)) < 0 && r != -EBADR) {
|
||||
log_warning("Cannot add dependency job for unit %s, ignoring: %s", dep->meta.id, bus_error(e, r));
|
||||
dbus_error_free(e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
SET_FOREACH(dep, ret->unit->meta.dependencies[UNIT_CONFLICTS], i)
|
||||
if ((r = transaction_add_job_and_dependencies(m, JOB_STOP, dep, ret, true, override, e, NULL)) < 0 && r != -EBADR)
|
||||
if ((r = transaction_add_job_and_dependencies(m, JOB_STOP, dep, ret, true, override, true, e, NULL)) < 0 && r != -EBADR)
|
||||
goto fail;
|
||||
|
||||
SET_FOREACH(dep, ret->unit->meta.dependencies[UNIT_CONFLICTED_BY], i)
|
||||
if ((r = transaction_add_job_and_dependencies(m, JOB_STOP, dep, ret, true, override, false, e, NULL)) < 0 && r != -EBADR)
|
||||
goto fail;
|
||||
|
||||
} else if (type == JOB_STOP || type == JOB_RESTART || type == JOB_TRY_RESTART) {
|
||||
|
||||
SET_FOREACH(dep, ret->unit->meta.dependencies[UNIT_REQUIRED_BY], i)
|
||||
if ((r = transaction_add_job_and_dependencies(m, type, dep, ret, true, override, e, NULL)) < 0 && r != -EBADR)
|
||||
if ((r = transaction_add_job_and_dependencies(m, type, dep, ret, true, override, false, e, NULL)) < 0 && r != -EBADR)
|
||||
goto fail;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1432,7 +1480,7 @@ static int transaction_add_isolate_jobs(Manager *m) {
|
||||
if (hashmap_get(m->transaction_jobs, u))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
if ((r = transaction_add_job_and_dependencies(m, JOB_STOP, u, NULL, true, false, NULL, NULL)) < 0)
|
||||
if ((r = transaction_add_job_and_dependencies(m, JOB_STOP, u, NULL, true, false, false, NULL, NULL)) < 0)
|
||||
log_warning("Cannot add isolate job for unit %s, ignoring: %s", u->meta.id, strerror(-r));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1455,7 +1503,7 @@ int manager_add_job(Manager *m, JobType type, Unit *unit, JobMode mode, bool ove
|
||||
|
||||
log_debug("Trying to enqueue job %s/%s", unit->meta.id, job_type_to_string(type));
|
||||
|
||||
if ((r = transaction_add_job_and_dependencies(m, type, unit, NULL, true, override, e, &ret)) < 0) {
|
||||
if ((r = transaction_add_job_and_dependencies(m, type, unit, NULL, true, override, false, e, &ret)) < 0) {
|
||||
transaction_abort(m);
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ static int mount_add_default_dependencies(Mount *m) {
|
||||
if ((r = unit_add_dependency_by_name(UNIT(m), UNIT_AFTER, SPECIAL_FSCK_TARGET, NULL, true)) < 0)
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
|
||||
if ((r = unit_add_two_dependencies_by_name(UNIT(m), UNIT_BEFORE, UNIT_CONFLICTS, SPECIAL_UMOUNT_TARGET, NULL, true)) < 0)
|
||||
if ((r = unit_add_two_dependencies_by_name(UNIT(m), UNIT_BEFORE, UNIT_CONFLICTED_BY, SPECIAL_UMOUNT_TARGET, NULL, true)) < 0)
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static int path_add_default_dependencies(Path *p) {
|
||||
if ((r = unit_add_two_dependencies_by_name(UNIT(p), UNIT_AFTER, UNIT_REQUIRES, SPECIAL_SYSINIT_TARGET, NULL, true)) < 0)
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
|
||||
return unit_add_two_dependencies_by_name(UNIT(p), UNIT_BEFORE, UNIT_CONFLICTS, SPECIAL_SHUTDOWN_TARGET, NULL, true);
|
||||
return unit_add_two_dependencies_by_name(UNIT(p), UNIT_BEFORE, UNIT_CONFLICTED_BY, SPECIAL_SHUTDOWN_TARGET, NULL, true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int path_load(Unit *u) {
|
||||
|
@ -873,7 +873,7 @@ static int service_add_default_dependencies(Service *s) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Second, activate normal shutdown */
|
||||
return unit_add_two_dependencies_by_name(UNIT(s), UNIT_BEFORE, UNIT_CONFLICTS, SPECIAL_SHUTDOWN_TARGET, NULL, true);
|
||||
return unit_add_two_dependencies_by_name(UNIT(s), UNIT_BEFORE, UNIT_CONFLICTED_BY, SPECIAL_SHUTDOWN_TARGET, NULL, true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int service_load(Unit *u) {
|
||||
|
@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ static int socket_add_default_dependencies(Socket *s) {
|
||||
if ((r = unit_add_two_dependencies_by_name(UNIT(s), UNIT_AFTER, UNIT_REQUIRES, SPECIAL_SYSINIT_TARGET, NULL, true)) < 0)
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
|
||||
return unit_add_two_dependencies_by_name(UNIT(s), UNIT_BEFORE, UNIT_CONFLICTS, SPECIAL_SHUTDOWN_TARGET, NULL, true);
|
||||
return unit_add_two_dependencies_by_name(UNIT(s), UNIT_BEFORE, UNIT_CONFLICTED_BY, SPECIAL_SHUTDOWN_TARGET, NULL, true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int socket_load(Unit *u) {
|
||||
|
@ -311,6 +311,7 @@ static int dot_one_property(const char *name, const char *prop, DBusMessageIter
|
||||
"RequisiteOverridable", "[color=\"darkblue\"]",
|
||||
"Wants", "[color=\"darkgrey\"]",
|
||||
"Conflicts", "[color=\"red\"]",
|
||||
"ConflictedBy", "[color=\"red\"]",
|
||||
"After", "[color=\"green\"]"
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ static int timer_add_default_dependencies(Timer *t) {
|
||||
if ((r = unit_add_two_dependencies_by_name(UNIT(t), UNIT_AFTER, UNIT_REQUIRES, SPECIAL_SYSINIT_TARGET, NULL, true)) < 0)
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
|
||||
return unit_add_two_dependencies_by_name(UNIT(t), UNIT_BEFORE, UNIT_CONFLICTS, SPECIAL_SHUTDOWN_TARGET, NULL, true);
|
||||
return unit_add_two_dependencies_by_name(UNIT(t), UNIT_BEFORE, UNIT_CONFLICTED_BY, SPECIAL_SHUTDOWN_TARGET, NULL, true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int timer_load(Unit *u) {
|
||||
|
@ -934,6 +934,10 @@ static void retroactively_start_dependencies(Unit *u) {
|
||||
SET_FOREACH(other, u->meta.dependencies[UNIT_CONFLICTS], i)
|
||||
if (!UNIT_IS_ACTIVE_OR_ACTIVATING(unit_active_state(other)))
|
||||
manager_add_job(u->meta.manager, JOB_STOP, other, JOB_REPLACE, true, NULL, NULL);
|
||||
|
||||
SET_FOREACH(other, u->meta.dependencies[UNIT_CONFLICTED_BY], i)
|
||||
if (!UNIT_IS_ACTIVE_OR_ACTIVATING(unit_active_state(other)))
|
||||
manager_add_job(u->meta.manager, JOB_STOP, other, JOB_REPLACE, true, NULL, NULL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void retroactively_stop_dependencies(Unit *u) {
|
||||
@ -1312,7 +1316,8 @@ int unit_add_dependency(Unit *u, UnitDependency d, Unit *other, bool add_referen
|
||||
[UNIT_REQUIRED_BY] = _UNIT_DEPENDENCY_INVALID,
|
||||
[UNIT_REQUIRED_BY_OVERRIDABLE] = _UNIT_DEPENDENCY_INVALID,
|
||||
[UNIT_WANTED_BY] = _UNIT_DEPENDENCY_INVALID,
|
||||
[UNIT_CONFLICTS] = UNIT_CONFLICTS,
|
||||
[UNIT_CONFLICTS] = UNIT_CONFLICTED_BY,
|
||||
[UNIT_CONFLICTED_BY] = UNIT_CONFLICTS,
|
||||
[UNIT_BEFORE] = UNIT_AFTER,
|
||||
[UNIT_AFTER] = UNIT_BEFORE,
|
||||
[UNIT_ON_FAILURE] = _UNIT_DEPENDENCY_INVALID,
|
||||
@ -2138,6 +2143,7 @@ static const char* const unit_dependency_table[_UNIT_DEPENDENCY_MAX] = {
|
||||
[UNIT_REQUIRED_BY_OVERRIDABLE] = "RequiredByOverridable",
|
||||
[UNIT_WANTED_BY] = "WantedBy",
|
||||
[UNIT_CONFLICTS] = "Conflicts",
|
||||
[UNIT_CONFLICTED_BY] = "ConflictedBy",
|
||||
[UNIT_BEFORE] = "Before",
|
||||
[UNIT_AFTER] = "After",
|
||||
[UNIT_REFERENCES] = "References",
|
||||
|
@ -108,7 +108,8 @@ enum UnitDependency {
|
||||
UNIT_WANTED_BY, /* inverse of 'wants' */
|
||||
|
||||
/* Negative dependencies */
|
||||
UNIT_CONFLICTS, /* inverse of 'conflicts' is 'conflicts' */
|
||||
UNIT_CONFLICTS, /* inverse of 'conflicts' is 'conflicted_by' */
|
||||
UNIT_CONFLICTED_BY,
|
||||
|
||||
/* Order */
|
||||
UNIT_BEFORE, /* inverse of 'before' is 'after' and vice versa */
|
||||
|
@ -16,9 +16,6 @@ m4_dnl
|
||||
m4_ifdef(`TARGET_FEDORA',
|
||||
# On Fedora Runlevel 5 is graphical login
|
||||
Names=runlevel5.target
|
||||
# Pull in prefdm via requires, to make sure when it conflicts with
|
||||
# getty@tty1.service it takes precedence.
|
||||
Requires=prefdm.service
|
||||
)m4_dnl
|
||||
m4_ifdef(`TARGET_SUSE',
|
||||
Names=runlevel5.target
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user