From 80f6507c832435c2c9d9abd247d1c447de1073e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 17:01:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] varlink: use the right validator for error replies

---
 src/shared/varlink.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/shared/varlink.c b/src/shared/varlink.c
index 118ede7e05d..ae6e142b650 100644
--- a/src/shared/varlink.c
+++ b/src/shared/varlink.c
@@ -2189,7 +2189,7 @@ int varlink_error(Varlink *v, const char *error_id, JsonVariant *parameters) {
         else {
                 const char *bad_field = NULL;
 
-                r = varlink_idl_validate_method_reply(symbol, parameters, &bad_field);
+                r = varlink_idl_validate_error(symbol, parameters, &bad_field);
                 if (r < 0)
                         log_debug_errno(r, "Parameters for error %s didn't pass validation on field '%s', ignoring: %m", error_id, strna(bad_field));
         }