mirror of
https://github.com/systemd/systemd.git
synced 2024-12-22 17:35:35 +03:00
sd-dhcp-client: simplify dhcp4 t1/t2 parsing
The parsing of the dhcpv4 lease lifetime, as well as the t1/t2 times, is simplified by this commit. This differs from previous behavior; previously, the lease lifetime and t1/t2 values were modified by random 'fuzz' by subtracting 3, then adding a random number between 0 and (slightly over) 2 seconds. The resulting values were therefore always between 1-3 seconds shorter than the value provided by the server (or the default, in case of t1/t2). Now, as described in RFC2131, the random 'fuzz' is between -1 and +1 seconds, meaning the actual t1 and t2 value will be up to 1 second earlier or later than the server-provided (or default) t1/t2 value. This also differs in handling the lease lifetime, as described above it previously was adjusted by the random 'fuzz', but the RFC does not state that the lease expiration time should be adjusted, so now the code uses exactly the lease lifetime as provided by the server with no adjustment.
This commit is contained in:
parent
3d75a443ee
commit
b0d7d8063c
@ -1653,20 +1653,6 @@ static int client_handle_ack(sd_dhcp_client *client, DHCPMessage *ack, size_t le
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static uint64_t client_compute_timeout(sd_dhcp_client *client, uint32_t lifetime, double factor) {
|
||||
assert(client);
|
||||
assert(client->request_sent);
|
||||
assert(lifetime > 0);
|
||||
|
||||
if (lifetime > 3)
|
||||
lifetime -= 3;
|
||||
else
|
||||
lifetime = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
return client->request_sent + (lifetime * USEC_PER_SEC * factor) +
|
||||
+ (random_u32() & 0x1fffff);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int client_set_lease_timeouts(sd_dhcp_client *client) {
|
||||
usec_t time_now;
|
||||
char time_string[FORMAT_TIMESPAN_MAX];
|
||||
@ -1691,49 +1677,31 @@ static int client_set_lease_timeouts(sd_dhcp_client *client) {
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
assert(client->request_sent <= time_now);
|
||||
|
||||
/* convert the various timeouts from relative (secs) to absolute (usecs) */
|
||||
client->expire_time = client_compute_timeout(client, client->lease->lifetime, 1);
|
||||
if (client->lease->t1 > 0 && client->lease->t2 > 0) {
|
||||
/* both T1 and T2 are given */
|
||||
if (client->lease->t1 < client->lease->t2 &&
|
||||
client->lease->t2 < client->lease->lifetime) {
|
||||
/* they are both valid */
|
||||
client->t2_time = client_compute_timeout(client, client->lease->t2, 1);
|
||||
client->t1_time = client_compute_timeout(client, client->lease->t1, 1);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
/* discard both */
|
||||
client->t2_time = client_compute_timeout(client, client->lease->lifetime, 7.0 / 8.0);
|
||||
client->lease->t2 = (client->lease->lifetime * 7) / 8;
|
||||
client->t1_time = client_compute_timeout(client, client->lease->lifetime, 0.5);
|
||||
client->lease->t1 = client->lease->lifetime / 2;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if (client->lease->t2 > 0 && client->lease->t2 < client->lease->lifetime) {
|
||||
/* only T2 is given, and it is valid */
|
||||
client->t2_time = client_compute_timeout(client, client->lease->t2, 1);
|
||||
client->t1_time = client_compute_timeout(client, client->lease->lifetime, 0.5);
|
||||
client->lease->t1 = client->lease->lifetime / 2;
|
||||
if (client->t2_time <= client->t1_time) {
|
||||
/* the computed T1 would be invalid, so discard T2 */
|
||||
client->t2_time = client_compute_timeout(client, client->lease->lifetime, 7.0 / 8.0);
|
||||
client->lease->t2 = (client->lease->lifetime * 7) / 8;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if (client->lease->t1 > 0 && client->lease->t1 < client->lease->lifetime) {
|
||||
/* only T1 is given, and it is valid */
|
||||
client->t1_time = client_compute_timeout(client, client->lease->t1, 1);
|
||||
client->t2_time = client_compute_timeout(client, client->lease->lifetime, 7.0 / 8.0);
|
||||
client->lease->t2 = (client->lease->lifetime * 7) / 8;
|
||||
if (client->t2_time <= client->t1_time) {
|
||||
/* the computed T2 would be invalid, so discard T1 */
|
||||
client->t2_time = client_compute_timeout(client, client->lease->lifetime, 0.5);
|
||||
client->lease->t2 = client->lease->lifetime / 2;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
/* fall back to the default timeouts */
|
||||
client->t1_time = client_compute_timeout(client, client->lease->lifetime, 0.5);
|
||||
client->lease->t1 = client->lease->lifetime / 2;
|
||||
client->t2_time = client_compute_timeout(client, client->lease->lifetime, 7.0 / 8.0);
|
||||
client->lease->t2 = (client->lease->lifetime * 7) / 8;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* verify that 0 < t2 < lifetime */
|
||||
if (client->lease->t2 == 0 || client->lease->t2 >= client->lease->lifetime)
|
||||
client->lease->t2 = T2_DEFAULT(client->lease->lifetime);
|
||||
/* verify that 0 < t1 < lifetime */
|
||||
if (client->lease->t1 == 0 || client->lease->t1 >= client->lease->t2)
|
||||
client->lease->t1 = T1_DEFAULT(client->lease->lifetime);
|
||||
/* now, if t1 >= t2, t1 *must* be T1_DEFAULT, since the previous check
|
||||
* could not evalate to false if t1 >= t2; so setting t2 to T2_DEFAULT
|
||||
* guarantees t1 < t2. */
|
||||
if (client->lease->t1 >= client->lease->t2)
|
||||
client->lease->t2 = T2_DEFAULT(client->lease->lifetime);
|
||||
|
||||
client->expire_time = client->request_sent + client->lease->lifetime * USEC_PER_SEC;
|
||||
client->t1_time = client->request_sent + client->lease->t1 * USEC_PER_SEC;
|
||||
client->t2_time = client->request_sent + client->lease->t2 * USEC_PER_SEC;
|
||||
|
||||
/* RFC2131 section 4.4.5:
|
||||
* Times T1 and T2 SHOULD be chosen with some random "fuzz".
|
||||
* Since the RFC doesn't specify here the exact 'fuzz' to use,
|
||||
* we use the range from section 4.1: -1 to +1 sec. */
|
||||
client->t1_time = usec_sub_signed(client->t1_time, RFC2131_RANDOM_FUZZ);
|
||||
client->t2_time = usec_sub_signed(client->t2_time, RFC2131_RANDOM_FUZZ);
|
||||
|
||||
/* after fuzzing, ensure t2 is still >= t1 */
|
||||
client->t2_time = MAX(client->t1_time, client->t2_time);
|
||||
|
||||
/* arm lifetime timeout */
|
||||
r = event_reset_time(client->event, &client->timeout_expire,
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user