mirror of
https://github.com/systemd/systemd.git
synced 2024-11-02 10:51:20 +03:00
core: make sure we don't throttle change signal generator when a reload is pending
Fixes: #10627
This commit is contained in:
parent
4b66bccab0
commit
b8d381c477
@ -2157,56 +2157,70 @@ static unsigned manager_dispatch_dbus_queue(Manager *m) {
|
||||
|
||||
assert(m);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Avoid recursion */
|
||||
if (m->dispatching_dbus_queue)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Anything to do at all? */
|
||||
if (!m->dbus_unit_queue && !m->dbus_job_queue && !m->send_reloading_done && !m->pending_reload_message)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
/* When we are reloading, let's not wait with generating signals, since we need to exit the manager as quickly
|
||||
* as we can. There's no point in throttling generation of signals in that case. */
|
||||
if (MANAGER_IS_RELOADING(m) || m->send_reloading_done || m->pending_reload_message)
|
||||
budget = (unsigned) -1; /* infinite budget in this case */
|
||||
else {
|
||||
/* Anything to do at all? */
|
||||
if (!m->dbus_unit_queue && !m->dbus_job_queue)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Do we have overly many messages queued at the moment? If so, let's not enqueue more on top, let's sit this
|
||||
* cycle out, and process things in a later cycle when the queues got a bit emptier. */
|
||||
if (manager_bus_n_queued_write(m) > MANAGER_BUS_BUSY_THRESHOLD)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
/* Do we have overly many messages queued at the moment? If so, let's not enqueue more on top, let's
|
||||
* sit this cycle out, and process things in a later cycle when the queues got a bit emptier. */
|
||||
if (manager_bus_n_queued_write(m) > MANAGER_BUS_BUSY_THRESHOLD)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Only process a certain number of units/jobs per event loop iteration. Even if the bus queue wasn't overly
|
||||
* full before this call we shouldn't increase it in size too wildly in one step, and we shouldn't monopolize
|
||||
* CPU time with generating these messages. Note the difference in counting of this "budget" and the
|
||||
* "threshold" above: the "budget" is decreased only once per generated message, regardless how many
|
||||
* busses/direct connections it is enqueued on, while the "threshold" is applied to each queued instance of bus
|
||||
* message, i.e. if the same message is enqueued to five busses/direct connections it will be counted five
|
||||
* times. This difference in counting ("references" vs. "instances") is primarily a result of the fact that
|
||||
* it's easier to implement it this way, however it also reflects the thinking that the "threshold" should put
|
||||
* a limit on used queue memory, i.e. space, while the "budget" should put a limit on time. Also note that
|
||||
* the "threshold" is currently chosen much higher than the "budget". */
|
||||
budget = MANAGER_BUS_MESSAGE_BUDGET;
|
||||
/* Only process a certain number of units/jobs per event loop iteration. Even if the bus queue wasn't
|
||||
* overly full before this call we shouldn't increase it in size too wildly in one step, and we
|
||||
* shouldn't monopolize CPU time with generating these messages. Note the difference in counting of
|
||||
* this "budget" and the "threshold" above: the "budget" is decreased only once per generated message,
|
||||
* regardless how many busses/direct connections it is enqueued on, while the "threshold" is applied to
|
||||
* each queued instance of bus message, i.e. if the same message is enqueued to five busses/direct
|
||||
* connections it will be counted five times. This difference in counting ("references"
|
||||
* vs. "instances") is primarily a result of the fact that it's easier to implement it this way,
|
||||
* however it also reflects the thinking that the "threshold" should put a limit on used queue memory,
|
||||
* i.e. space, while the "budget" should put a limit on time. Also note that the "threshold" is
|
||||
* currently chosen much higher than the "budget". */
|
||||
budget = MANAGER_BUS_MESSAGE_BUDGET;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
m->dispatching_dbus_queue = true;
|
||||
|
||||
while (budget > 0 && (u = m->dbus_unit_queue)) {
|
||||
while (budget != 0 && (u = m->dbus_unit_queue)) {
|
||||
|
||||
assert(u->in_dbus_queue);
|
||||
|
||||
bus_unit_send_change_signal(u);
|
||||
n++, budget--;
|
||||
n++;
|
||||
|
||||
if (budget != (unsigned) -1)
|
||||
budget--;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
while (budget > 0 && (j = m->dbus_job_queue)) {
|
||||
while (budget != 0 && (j = m->dbus_job_queue)) {
|
||||
assert(j->in_dbus_queue);
|
||||
|
||||
bus_job_send_change_signal(j);
|
||||
n++, budget--;
|
||||
n++;
|
||||
|
||||
if (budget != (unsigned) -1)
|
||||
budget--;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
m->dispatching_dbus_queue = false;
|
||||
|
||||
if (budget > 0 && m->send_reloading_done) {
|
||||
if (m->send_reloading_done) {
|
||||
m->send_reloading_done = false;
|
||||
bus_manager_send_reloading(m, false);
|
||||
n++, budget--;
|
||||
n++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (budget > 0 && m->pending_reload_message) {
|
||||
if (m->pending_reload_message) {
|
||||
bus_send_pending_reload_message(m);
|
||||
n++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user