From e2d0fa6feb3797246c8bfda3db45a2f5b62e1b5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lennart Poettering Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 19:36:40 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] lgtm: complain about accept() [people should use accept4() instead, due to O_CLOEXEC] --- .lgtm/cpp-queries/PotentiallyDangerousFunction.ql | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/.lgtm/cpp-queries/PotentiallyDangerousFunction.ql b/.lgtm/cpp-queries/PotentiallyDangerousFunction.ql index 96712cf1c67..865330430d9 100644 --- a/.lgtm/cpp-queries/PotentiallyDangerousFunction.ql +++ b/.lgtm/cpp-queries/PotentiallyDangerousFunction.ql @@ -41,6 +41,9 @@ predicate potentiallyDangerousFunction(Function f, string message) { ) or ( f.getQualifiedName() = "strerror" and message = "Call to strerror() is not thread-safe. Use strerror_r() or printf()'s %m format string instead." + ) or ( + f.getQualifiedName() = "accept" and + message = "Call to accept() is not O_CLOEXEC-safe. Use accept4() instead." ) }