IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
When building with './configure --enable-debug && make' it fails with:
udev-rules.c: In function ‘dump_token’:
udev-rules.c:366: error: ‘struct <anonymous>’ has no member named ‘i’
Signed-off-by: Michael Prokop <mika@grml.org>
This allows you to re-process the rules if the content of the device
has been changed, most useful for block subsystem to cause vol_id to
be run again.
In certain cut-down situations such as an installer or inside the
initramfs, we simply don't have any kind of name service. While we
could use rules without OWNER or GROUP, it's better to have the same
rules as a full system and have udevd ignore those parts of the rules.
Adds a --resolve-names=never switch to udevd that has this effect.
Since a while we change the database with a "test" run, but do not update
the node and symlinks. We need to "force" all the time, to keep things
in sync.
On my Ubuntu installation this removes 15k of duplicate strings,
using a temporary index of about 25k.
Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 13:07, Matthias Schwarzott <zzam@gentoo.org> wrote:
> I managed to let udev-131 segfault at startup.
>
> I configured it like this:
> CFLAGS="-Wall -ggdb" ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --exec-prefix=
>
> Running it in gdb shows it segfaults at udev-rules.c:831
>
> (gdb) run
> Starting program: /tmp/udev-131/udev/udevd
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x0804ea06 in get_key (udev=0x9175008, line=0xafcdc8f0, key=0xafcdc5d8,
> op=0xafcdc5d0, value=0xafcdc5d4)
> at udev-rules.c:831
> 831 dbg(udev, "%s '%s'-'%s'\n", operation_str[*op], *key, *value);
If compiled without optimization, the dbg() macro dereferences variables
which are not available. Convert the string array to a function, which just
returns NULL if compiled without DEBUG.
I'm worried about what will happen with things like
KERNELS=="*" # pointless rule
KERNELS=="doesnt-match" # another pointless rule
Since TK_RULE < TK_M_PARENTS_MAX, we will try to match all three tokens
against parents of the current device. I can't think of a bad case,
but it's not exactly good either.
Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
LAST_RULE was broken, and I broke TK_END by making it do the same.
It used a "break" which exited the switch statement, but not the loop!
==2953== Invalid read of size 4
==2953== at 0x4081EE: dump_token (udev-rules.c:859)
==2953== by 0x40BADB: udev_rules_apply_to_event (udev-rules.c:1849)
==2953== by 0x403F17: udev_event_execute_rules (udev-event.c:554)
==2953== by 0x418626: main (test-udev.c:100)
==2953== Address 0x55ab1f8 is 0 bytes after a block of size 80 alloc'd
==2953== at 0x4C23082: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:429)
==2953== by 0x40B13B: udev_rules_new (udev-rules.c:1670)
==2953== by 0x418536: main (test-udev.c:84)
...
Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Initializing a char array to "" is equivalent to a memset()
call - which is exactly what it gets compiled to.
Fixing this one callsite reduced memset() _user_ cpu cycles
from 2-4% to 0.05% on the EeePC.
Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
The wait should be ordered after matching KERNEL, ENV, etc.
but before ATTR.
Without this, WAIT_FOR_SYSFS rules will be applied unconditionally
to all events.
Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Re: b99028c963 shrink struct udev_event
TEST 136: test multi matches 2
device '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.7/usb5/5-2/5-2:1.0/tty/ttyACM0' expecting node 'right'
==15011==
==15011== 7 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1 of 1
==15011== at 0x47F9AB8: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
==15011== by 0x489CB5F: strdup (in /lib32/libc-2.7.so)
==15011== by 0x8050F40: udev_rules_apply_to_event (udev-rules.c:1973)
==15011== by 0x804A658: udev_event_execute_rules (udev-event.c:549)
==15011== by 0x805A636: main (test-udev.c:100)
add: ok
==15012==
==15012== 7 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1 of 1
==15012== at 0x47F1AB8: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
==15012== by 0x4898B5F: strdup (in /lib32/libc-2.7.so)
==15012== by 0x8050F40: udev_rules_apply_to_event (udev-rules.c:1973)
==15012== by 0x804A9DF: udev_event_execute_rules (udev-event.c:658)
==15012== by 0x805A636: main (test-udev.c:100)
remove: ok
Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
