IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Since c6a373a263, we might encounter unit templates via the
'list-units' verb. These aren't restartable (and we throw errors), so
make sure they're filtered out of the completion options.
fixes downstream bug: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/41719
This fixes the issue noted by Zbigniew in most cases.
if a unit's name is enclosed in single quotes completion still
will not happen after the first `\'.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78388
I think that it is better to return good results slightly more slowly,
than partial quickly. Also reading from disk seems fast enough. Even
the delay on first try with completely cold cache is acceptable.
This is just for bash, 'cause zsh was already doing this.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790768
Since this is a shortopt with an optional argument, assume the user
knows what they're doing. The longopts --boot and --this-boot will
continue to offer boot IDs as completions.
-- fix grammar and reword some descriptions for clarity
-- add a useful description of what --follow does
-- fix the description for --after-cursor
-- properly introduce the FSS acronym for "Forward Secure Sealing" in
both sections
-- clarify the --disk-usage command
[zj: perform similar changes to zsh completions]
squash! journalctl: fix several issues in --help message text
Instead of having two different listings of machines, use an autoloaded
function that can be used by other shell completions in the future. It
will also allow editing a single file to change the way machinectl and
systemd-run completion for machines.
Suggested by David Wilkins <dwilkins@maths.tcd.ie> in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967521:
> [Specific boot ID is a] bit of a palaver to obtain. I consulted the
> verbose dump of the journal to discover the _BOOT_ID for the
> timestamp, and then generated the journal dump for that boot using
> journalctl _BOOT_ID=foo -o short-monotonic.