IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Now that mkfs.btrfs is adding support for compressing the generated
filesystem (https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/pull/882), let's
add general support for specifying the compression algorithm and
compression level to use.
We opt to not parse the specified compression algorithm and instead
pass it on as is to the mkfs tool. This has a few benefits:
- We support every compression algorithm supported by every tool
automatically.
- Users don't need to modify systemd-repart if a mkfs tool learns a
new compression algorithm in the future
- We don't need to maintain a bunch of tables for filesystem to map
from our generic compression algorithm enum to the filesystem specific
names.
We don't add support for btrfs just yet until the corresponding PR
in btrfs-progs is merged.
TEST-46-HOMED fails on ext4 because the filesystem is deemed to small
for activation by cryptsetup. Let's bump the minimal filesystem size for
ext4 a bit to be in the same ballpark as ext4 and btrfs to avoid weird
errors due to impossibly small filesystems.
Also use U64_MB while we're touching this.
I expect the test output to be the second argument, so we're diffing "expected"
and "output", not the other way around.
I noticed this when working on https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/33081.
This makes output a bit shorter and nicer. For us, shorter output is generally
better.
Also, drop unnecessary UINT64_C macros. The left operand is always uint64_t,
and C upcasting rules mean that it doesn't matter if the right operand is
narrower or signed, the operation is always done on the wider unsigned type.
Having these named differently than the test itself mostly creates
unecessary confusion and makes writing logic against the tests harder
so let's rename the testsuite-xx units and scripts to just use the
test name itself.
