IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
The warning is correct, since we don't inherit the necessary
unittest.TestCase class, but that's on purpose, since the Utilities
class is not supposed to be instantiated on its own, but should
complement other classes' definitions which do inherit from the
unittest.TestCase class.
It currently works because `\(` and `\)` are not valid escape sequences,
so they're not treated differently. Using raw strings (or double
backslashes) is a more correct solution.
Multiline comments are converted to docstrings only when they're the
first statement in a function/method. Even though they're still a no-op
otherwise, let's use "true" comments to make pylint happy.
Note to self: should I ever become a black hat hacker, this is how I'd
hide a vulnerability. ;-)
(No, this one is not a vulnerability)
Follow-up for: 163d1ea5dd
We have the journal file open already, hence reference it via the fd
insted of the file name. After all, some other tool might have
renamed/deleted it already.
Let's not actually reuse the fd though, since we want a separate file
offset for the copying, hence just make it simply and reopen via
/proc/self/fd/.
Follow-up for d71ece3f0b
to let them use reproducible identifiers, which should make it possible
to really use files copied from OSS-Fuzz to reproduce issues on
GHActions and locally. Prompted by https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/22365
No actual code changes, just renaming.
Rationale: the focus here should be on the fact that these are "unified"
images, whether our stub is used or not, or something else doesn't
really matter. Moreover, these are still Linux entries. Hence, emphasize
that these are *unified* images, and *Linux* images, and deemphesize
that our sd-stub is likely used.
it might be totally inaccessible, hence weaken our language a bit and
just say "not readable", thus making not claim whether it is writable or
not.
Follow-up for 3a90bef55a
It's a follow-up to https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/10200 where
that fuzzer was introduced. At the time it was run regularly on machines
where machine-id wasn't present so it was kind of reproducible. Now
it's run on CIFuzz and CFLite using GHActions with the public OSS-Fuzz
corpora (based on that particular machine-id) so to fully utilize
those corpora it's necessary to use it always. Other than that
it makes it possible for fuzzers targeting outgoing packets
based on incoming packets like https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1795921
to get past client_parse_message on my machine :-)
Fixes a regression caused by 3008a6f21c.
Before the commit, when `mkdir_parents_internal()` is called from `mkdir_p()`,
it uses `_mkdir()` as `flag` is zero. But after the commit, `mkdir_safe_internal()`
is always used. Hence, if the path contains a symlink, it fails with -ENOTDIR.
To fix the issue, this makes `mkdir_p()` calls `mkdir_parents_internal()` with
MKDIR_FOLLOW_SYMLINK flag.
Fixes#22334.
It's totally not OK to write to the strings returned by it, the data is
shared by all code that references the message.
While we are at it, simplify the code via
json_variant_set_field_string().
Follow-up for: 5ef599b324
This partially undoes the effect of
ab6e257b3e.
Originally, we always used the mmap logic to determine the current end
of the file. ab6e257b3e changed this so
that we always used pread().
With this change we'll use pread() from the synchronization thread and
mmap otherwise.
C macros are nasty. We use them, but we try to be conservative with
them. In particular passing literal, complex code blocks as argument is
icky, because of "," handling of C, and also because it's quite a
challange for most code highlighters and similar. Hence, let's avoid
that. Using macros for genreating functions is OK but if so, the
parameters should be simple words, not full code blocks.
hence, rework DEFINE_CUSTOM_TEST_MAIN() to take a function name instead
of code block as argument.
As side-effect this also fixes a bunch of cases where we might end up
returning a negative value from main().
Some uses of DEFINE_CUSTOM_TEST_MAIN() inserted local variables into the
main() functions, these are replaced by static variables, and their
destructors by the static destructor logic.
This doesn't fix any bugs or so, it's just supposed to make the code
easier to work with and improve it easthetically.
Or in other words: let's use macros where it really makes sense, but
let's not go overboard with it.
(And yes, FOREACH_DIRENT() is another one of those macros that take
code, and I dislike that too and regret I ever added that.)
