IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
When generating utmp/wtmp entries, optionally add both LOGIN_PROCESS and
INIT_PROCESS entries or even all three of LOGIN_PROCESS, INIT_PROCESS
and USER_PROCESS entries, instead of just a single INIT_PROCESS entry.
With this change systemd may be used to not only invoke a getty directly
in a SysV-compliant way but alternatively also a login(1) implementation
or even forego getty and login entirely, and invoke arbitrary shells in
a way that they appear in who(1) or w(1).
This is preparation for a later commit that adds a "machinectl shell"
operation to invoke a shell in a container, in a way that is compatible
with who(1) and w(1).
This extends on the relationship between timedatectl's set-ntp command
and its effect on the systemd-timesyncd.service unit. This also links
that unit back to the timedatectl man page.
Closes#798.
Previously it was just descibed that ExecStartPost= commands were
started "after" the ExecStart= command(s).
This hasn't specified after which event, which varies from after it has
been started, after it has exited, after it has sent READY=1 or after it
has taken the bus name, depending on Type=.
This now describes that it happens after the *service* has "started",
as defined by the Type=, and provides some clarification about precisely
when this is.
This may be unnecessary duplication, but it removes the ambiguity as to
whether RemainAfterExit=no means that ExecStartPost= shouldn't be
started because it means the service has stopped when the ExecStart=
command terminates, not "started".
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251334
is about a unit file which has
Environment=TERM=linux PS1=system-upgrade:\w\$\x20
We used to allow that, but after recent tightening of parsing
rules, we barf. Make it clear that this is intentional.
The --machine option used to describe searching for machines in
/var/lib/machines, which is not the whole story, so let's link to where
it's described in more detail.
Even when we use shortened, combined words, we still should uppercase
where a new word starts. I couldn't find a canonically capitalized
version of this term, hence I think we should follow our naming rules
here.
This should clear up some confusion in
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/717.
This basically copies the description from systemd.unit to this
man page. Masking can happen also in /run, so strike the part
about /etc, and also add the magic work "mask".
Justification is similar to BPDUGuard rename. "Positive" values
are easier. This is a rather uncommon option, so using a slightly
longer name should not be a problem, and may in fact may make it
easier to guess what the option does without reading the
documentation.
Looking at the kernel commit, "on" seems to be the default value:
commit 867a59436fc35593ae0e0efcd56cc6d2f8506586
Author: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Jun 5 10:08:01 2013 -0400
bridge: Add a flag to control unicast packet flood.
Add a flag to control flood of unicast traffic. By default, flood is
on and the bridge will flood unicast traffic if it doesn't know
the destination. When the flag is turned off, unicast traffic
without an FDB will not be forwarded to the specified port.
... and it seems to be the reasonable thing to do by default.
Rename to follow the follow the style of other options.
In general "positive" options are preferred to "negative" ones,
because they are easier to describe and easier for humans to
parse (c.f. the shortening on the man page entry).
Old name was slightly misleading, because this flag does not determine
whether DSCP is used overall, but only if it is copied to the
decapsulated packet. Rename to better reflect that.
"Copy" does not imply direction. This is on purpose, because we might
later on enhance the setting to allow/disallow copying in the other
direction, to the encapsulated packet. If that is implemented,
CopyDSCP could understand additional values. This is nicer than
having two separate settings and follows the example of DHCP=.
Also, we try to avoid abbreviations, but we allow acronyms
like MTU, in DiscoverPathMTU=.
This setting was recently added, so it's fine to rename it without
backwards compat.
