IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
>> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 15:33, Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> wrote:
>
> Close, but no cigar. Looks like the static nodes are not assigned
> permissions 0660 even if a gid is set (the nodes have perms 0600).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tom
Most of the udev database from initramfs should be deleted before
starting udev in the real root. udevadm: info --cleanup-db deletes
all database entries in /run/udev. Events that processed IMPORT{db},
or mark devices explicitely as persistent, will be excluded.
We can not predict the major/minor of non-existing devices:
$ grep . /sys/class/block/sd*/dev
/sys/class/block/sda1/dev:259:524288
/sys/class/block/sda2/dev:259:262144
/sys/class/block/sda3/dev:259:786432
/sys/class/block/sda4/dev:259:131072
/sys/class/block/sda/dev:259:0
/sys/class/block/sdb/dev:259:655360
/sys/class/block/sdc/dev:259:393216
If this functionality is still needed for some broken hardware, it needs to be
solved with a tool not part of the udev package. Because such option is unreliable
and unsafe to use.
There is no way to ignore an event these days. Libudev events can
not be suppressed. It only prevents RUN keys from being executed,
which results in an inconsistent behavior in current setups.
This should also address:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 16:21, Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it> wrote:
> udev_rules_new() in udev/udev-rules.c unconditionally creates the
> directory.
> This is a problem because the function is called also by e.g. udevadm
> test, and creating /dev/.udev/ when it does not exist is an unacceptable
> side effect which will break everything else that checks for its
> existence to know if udev is running.
Its use breaks too many things which expect to be run from independent
later rules, and is an idication that something needs to be fixed
properly instead.
With well defined and kernel-supplied node names, we no longer need
to support a possible stack of conflicting symlinks and node names.
Only symlinks with identical names can be claimed by multiple devices.
This shrinks the former /dev/.udev/names/ significantly.
Also the /dev/{block,char}/MAJ:MIN" links are excluded from the name
stack - they are unique and can not conflict.
