IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Aaargh. See the comment in the code.
Apparently the range is like that:
$ sudo bash -c 'echo "default 1001" >/sys/fs/cgroup/user.slice/io.bfq.weight'
bash: line 0: echo: write error: Numerical result out of range
$ uname -r
5.11.0-0.rc4.129.fc34.x86_64
Instead of using a short fixed string, let's use a huge blob for
testing, with randomized size and contents, that definitely is above the
16K buffer size conservative_renameat() uses internally.
The "XDG standardization for applications" specification states that
services should be in the form:
app[-<launcher>]-<ApplicationID>[@<RANDOM>].service or
app[-<launcher>]-<ApplicationID>-<RANDOM>.scope
In this case "autostart" takes the place of [RANDOM] to provide a unique
identifier if the same app is launched elsewhere. As it is a service
that means it should be set as a template not using a hyphen delimiter.
To add secure-boot enrolling support, we need to be able to specify
the EFI_VARIABLE_APPEND_WRITE flag so let's make the efivar_set()
methods more generic so we can set that flag.
Let's make sure we still look at the etags reported by http 304 (i.e.
the cache management code). Otherwise we won't properly realize we
already downloaded this before.
This fixes a bug introduced in 6792cbbcf8
The old name originates when this was used to discover "machine" images,
as managed by machined/machinectl. But nowadays this is also used by
portable services and system extensions, hence let's use a more generic
name for this API. Taking inspiration from "dissect-image.[ch]", let's call
this "discover-image.[ch]".
This is pure renaming, no other changes.
There is no technical reason to support systems with split-usr, except for
backwards compatibility. Even though systemd itself makes an effort to support
this, many other tools aren't as careful. Despite those efforts, we
(collectively) get it wrong often, because doing it "wrong" on systems with
merged-usr has no consequences. Since almost all developers are on such
systems, any issues are only discovered late. Supporting this split-usr mode
makes both code and documentation more complicated. The split is purely
artificial and has no justification except to allow old installation to not
update. Mechanisms to update existing systems are available though: Fedora
did that in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove, Debian has
the usrmerge package.
The next version of Debian will only support systems with split-usr=false,
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=978636#178:
The Technical Committee resolves that Debian 'bookworm' should
support only the merged-usr root filesystem layout, dropping support
for the non-merged-usr layout.
Let's start warning if split-usr mode is used, in preparation to removing the
split in one of the future releases.
Let's split out the two codepaths a bit, and emphasize which ones it the
new-style and which the old-style codepath, and let's clearly convert
the params of the old-stye into the new style for further processing, so
that the old style path is brief and isolated.
No change in behaviour.
Follow-up for: 8885fed4e3
As we usually (unfortunately not always though) do not use abbreviations.
Tx may be standard abbreviation, but we already have e.g.
TransmitChecksumOffload=. So, let's use Transmit instead of Tx.
Follow-up for ef4a91a7e8.
Let's tighten the logic behind path_extract_filename() a bit: first of
all, refuse all cases of invalid paths with -EINVAL. More importantly
though return a recognizable error when a valid path is specified that
does not contain any filename. Specifically, "/" will now result in
-EADDRNOTAVAIL.
This changes API, but none of the existing callers care about the return
value, hence the change should be fine.
The wiki was slightly stale, and almost all the information there
was already present in the man page. I moved the remaing part (discussion)
into the man page and adjusted all links to point to the man page instead.
daemon(7) has a some examples of packaging scriptlets… I don't think it fits
there very well. Most likely they should be moved to systemd.preset(5) or maybe
even removed, but I'm leaving that for later.
