IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
In some recent PRs (e.g. #32628) I started to systematically name return
parameters that shall only be initialized on failure (because they carry
additional error meta information, such as the line/column number of
parse failures or so). Let's make this official in the coding style.
(cherry picked from commit 7811864b08)
This reverts commit 5e8ff010a1.
This broke all the URLs, we can't have that. (And actually, we probably don't
_want_ to make the change either. It's nicer to have all the pages in one
directory, so one doesn't have to figure out to which collection the page
belongs.)
… but only for a single variable.
The guidelines already allowed declaring variables at the point of
initialization. But not making a function call to do that. Let's allow that
now. The existing style of declaring and initializing seperate is still
allowed, and whatever makes most sense should be used.
I have no idea if this is going to cause rendering problems, and it is fairly
hard to check. So let's just merge this, and if it github markdown processor
doesn't like it, revert.
Say that r should be declared at the top of the function.
Don't say that fixed buffers result in truncation, right after saying that they
must only be used if size is known.
Adjust order of examples to be consistent.
Primarily:
1. Mention that we prefer if return parameters carry "ret_" as prefix in
their name
2. Clarify that debug-level logging is always OK, and irrelevant to when
deciding whether a function is logging or non-logging.
It's not that I think that "hostname" is vastly superior to "host name". Quite
the opposite — the difference is small, and in some context the two-word version
does fit better. But in the tree, there are ~200 occurrences of the first, and
>1600 of the other, and consistent spelling is more important than any particular
spelling choice.
@bertob wants us to be strict here, and only have one "#" header per
markdown file, and use "##" (or "###", …) for all others. Interestingly,
we mostly got this right already, but this fixes a few cases where this
wasn't correct.
