IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Our dumbed down example PAM stacks do not contain cracklib/pwq modules,
hence using use_authtok on the pam_unix.so password change stack won't
work, because it has the effect that pam_unix.so never asks for a
password on its own, expecting the cracklib/pwq modules to have
queried/validated them beforehand.
I noticed this issue because of #30969: Debian's PAM setup suffers by
the same issue – even though they don't actually use our suggested PAM
fragments at all.
See: #30969
This was a copy/paste mistae apparently, there's not "try_authtok" and
this was supposed to copy what Fedora uses, which uses "use_authtok"
correctly. Hence adjust this.
Fixes: #19369
Apparently PAM reacts differently on different systems (?) and if no
authoritative matching module is found might either succeed/fail,
depending on the system.
Let's lock this down explicitly, by hooking in pam_deny.so.
Of course, these PAM files are just examples, and no distro in its right
mind would ship these unmodified, but let's default to something safe.
Fixes: #12950
Stupid PAM, please just go away!
login[26]: pam_limits(login:session): error parsing the configuration file: '/etc/security/limits.conf'
login[26]: pam_unix(login:session): session opened for user root by LOGIN(uid=0)
login[26]: Error in service module
