IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Don't add an implicit RequiresMountsFor depenency for the
WorkingDirectory of a unit if the "-" character was used to
indicate that "a missing working directory is not considered fatal"
(see systemd.exec(5)). Otherwise systemd might fail the unit
because of missing dependencies.
This doesn't change anything in the generated source, but I think makes
semantically more sense, as these structures have undefined size, and we
only want to know the size up to the data field in these cases.
The &MEMORY_ACCOUNTING_DEFAULT; resolves to "yes" or "no" while the rest
of the paragraph talked about "on" and "off". Let's adjust this and
stick to "yes" and "no"...
Quite frankly I think it's not a particularly good idea to change the
docs based configuration changes... THis can only be incomplete, and the
wording is still very awkward since we repeat the same sentence twice.
THis dep existed since the unit was introduced, but I cannot see what
good it would do. Hence in the interest of simplifying things, let's
drop it. If breakages appear later we can certainly revert this again.
Fixes: #10469
First of all, let's fix logging: let's simply log the same message as we
do on success, so that there's always the same pair of these messages
around, regardless if the suspend was successful or not. To distuingish
a successful suspend from a failed one, check the ERRNO= field of the
structured message.
In most ways a failed suspend cycle is not distuingishable from a
successful one that took no time, hence let's treat it this way, and
always pair the success message with a failure message.
This also changes a more important concept: the post-suspend callouts
are now called also called on failure, following the same logic: let's
always run them in pairs: for every pre callout a post callout has to
follow.
Let's be a tiny bit more careful here.
Also, let's rearrange things to simplify them a bit, and to not use "r"
outside of its immediate scope of validity.
Also, let's rename it to rtc_write_wake_alarm(). Both changes together
make sure rtc_write_wake_alarm() and rtc_read_time() are more alike in
their naming and semantics.
Follow-up for 1fd2786161feba4276a81c3468cfbfb118f56517.
This fixes the following warning when built by clang:
```
../src/reply-password/reply-password.c:76:21 warning: variable 'length' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is true [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
```
Fixes CID#1396281 and CID#1396277.
