IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
It should make it easier to figure out what exactly services do there.
For example, with SYSTEMD_LOG_LEVEL=debug userdbd (v249) prints
```
varlink-5: New incoming message: {"method":"io.systemd.UserDatabase.GetUserRecord","parameters":{}}
```
before it crashes and systemd-resolved prints
```
varlink-21: New incoming message: {"method":"io.systemd.Resolve.ResolveAddress","parameters":{"address":[127,0,0,1],"flags":0,"ifindex":1000000,"family":0}}
```
and those messages are helpful (especially when scripts causing them
aren't clever enough to keep track of random stuff they send to systemd
:-))
If we assign our own test runner, passing arguments stops working
as unittest won't instantiate its own test runner after it parses
the arguments from sys.argv.
Consequence is that the tests will write to stderr now instead of
stdout since it doesn't seem possible to configure the stream that
unittest.main() will instantiate its test runner with so it'll
default to sys.stderr.
otherwise units using `DynamicUser=yes` won't be able to write the
coverage stats (currently affecting TEST-20-MAINPIDGAMES).
`DynamicUser=yes` implies `ProtectSystem=strict` and
`ProtectHome=read-only` and can't be overridden hence we need to
utilize `ReadWritePaths=` to work around that.
If the test logs contain lines like:
```
...systemd-resolved[735885]: profiling:/systemd-meson-build/src/shared/libsystemd-shared-250.a.p/base-filesystem.c.gcda:Cannot open
```
it means we're possibly missing some coverage since gcov can't write the stats,
usually due to the sandbox being too restrictive (e.g. ProtectSystem=yes,
ProtectHome=yes) or the $BUILD_DIR being inaccessible to non-root users.
Every time I need it I have to first relearn autopkgtest and find where
all the necessary stuff lives, so let's document it somewhere close to
systemd for (at least) future me.
In cbcdcaaa0e ("Add support for conditions on the machines firmware")
a new Firmware= directive was added for .netdev and .network files.
While it was also documented to work on .link files, in actual fact the
support was missing. Add that one extra line to make it work, and also
update the fuzzer directives.
Add the "Isolated" parameter in the *.network file, e.g.,
[Bridge]
Isolated=true|false
When the Isolated parameter is true, traffic coming out of this port
will only be forward to other ports whose Isolated parameter is false.
When Isolated is not specified, the port uses the kernel default
setting (false).
The "Isolated" parameter was introduced in Linux 4.19.
See man bridge(8) for more details.
But even though the kernel and bridge/iproute2 recognize the "Isolated"
parameter, systemd-networkd did not have a way to set it.
The warning is correct, since we don't inherit the necessary
unittest.TestCase class, but that's on purpose, since the Utilities
class is not supposed to be instantiated on its own, but should
complement other classes' definitions which do inherit from the
unittest.TestCase class.
It currently works because `\(` and `\)` are not valid escape sequences,
so they're not treated differently. Using raw strings (or double
backslashes) is a more correct solution.
Multiline comments are converted to docstrings only when they're the
first statement in a function/method. Even though they're still a no-op
otherwise, let's use "true" comments to make pylint happy.
to let them use reproducible identifiers, which should make it possible
to really use files copied from OSS-Fuzz to reproduce issues on
GHActions and locally. Prompted by https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/22365
