IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Rewrite the test in bash and make it part of our integration test suite,
so it's actually executed in all our upstream CI environments.
The original test is flaky in environments where daemon-reload might
occur during the test runtime (e.g. when running the test in parallel
with the systemd-networkd test suite). Also, it was run only in CentOS
CI in limited way (i.e. without sanitizers), since it tests the host's
systemd, instead of the just built one.
Resolves: #29943
udevadm lock did not propagate the return code from the child process
because all positive values were treated as success.
v2:
Now 'udevadm test-builtin' ignores all positive return values from the
builtin commands. Otherwise, as the hwdb builtin returns an positive value
when a matching entry found, 'udevadm test-builtin hwdb' will fail.
v3:
Initialize partition table before calling 'sfdisk --delete'.
Co-authored-by: Yu Watanabe <watanabe.yu+github@gmail.com>
Skip calling start and stop methods on unit objects, as doing that is
not only time consuming, but it also starts/stops units that interfere
with the machine state. The actual code paths should be covered (to some
degree) by the respective method counterparts on the manager object.
Since the triggered unit intentionally fails without consuming any data
from the socket, we'd try to trigger it again and again, and we might
try to check the unit state in one of the "in-between" states, failing
the test:
[ 165.271698] H testsuite-07.sh[1032]: + systemctl start badbin_assert.socket
[ 165.977637] H testsuite-07.sh[1032]: + socat - ABSTRACT-CONNECT:badbin_assert.socket
[ 165.983787] H systemd[1]: Cannot find unit for notify message of PID 1039, ignoring.
[ 166.817187] H testsuite-07.sh[1032]: + timeout 10 sh -c 'while systemctl is-active badbin_assert.service; do sleep .5; done'
[ 167.049218] H testsuite-07.sh[1065]: active
[ 167.146854] H systemd[1]: Listening on badbin_assert.socket.
[ 167.163473] H systemd[1]: badbin_assert.socket: Incoming traffic
[ 167.542626] H systemd[1]: Cannot find unit for notify message of PID 1065, ignoring.
[ 167.543437] H (badbin)[1062]: badbin_assert.service: Failed to execute /tmp/badbin: Exec format error
[ 167.548346] H systemd[1]: badbin_assert.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=203/EXEC
[ 167.549482] H systemd[1]: badbin_assert.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
[ 167.561537] H systemd[1]: badbin_assert.socket: Incoming traffic
[ 167.933390] H systemd[1]: Started badbin_assert.service.
[ 167.950489] H (badbin)[1070]: badbin_assert.service: Failed to execute /tmp/badbin: Exec format error
[ 167.956318] H systemd[1]: badbin_assert.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=203/EXEC
[ 167.957173] H systemd[1]: badbin_assert.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
[ 167.974609] H systemd[1]: badbin_assert.socket: Incoming traffic
[ 168.042838] H testsuite-07.sh[1072]: failed
[ 168.094431] H testsuite-07.sh[1075]: ++ systemctl show -P ExecMainStatus badbin_assert.service
[ 168.704022] H systemd[1]: Started badbin_assert.service.
[ 168.778680] H (badbin)[1074]: badbin_assert.service: Failed to execute /tmp/badbin: Exec format error
[ 168.826881] H systemd[1]: badbin_assert.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=203/EXEC
[ 168.833825] H systemd[1]: badbin_assert.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
[ 168.923931] H testsuite-07.sh[1032]: + [[ 0 == 203 ]]
[ 168.951492] H systemd[1]: Cannot find unit for notify message of PID 1075, ignoring.
[ 168.999862] H testsuite-07.sh[615]: + echo 'Subtest /usr/lib/systemd/tests/testdata/units/testsuite-07.issue-30412.sh failed'
[ 168.999862] H testsuite-07.sh[615]: Subtest /usr/lib/systemd/tests/testdata/units/testsuite-07.issue-30412.sh failed
Follow-up for 1eeaa93de36 and 28a2d27650c.
This effectively reverts fa6f37c043 just for TEST-04, as we nuke the
journal repeatedly in this test which makes it particularly hard to
debug. Let's hope the issue behind fa6f37c043 won't bite us back in this
case.
Follow-up for: fa6f37c043
Reverts: 8f7c876bdc
This is no longer necessary, as the test for which this was introduced
in the first place has this handled explicitly (testsuite-04.journal.sh).
Follow-up to 9457dd8bae.
With OpenSSL 3.2.0+ this is necessary, otherwise the verification
of such CA certificate fails badly:
$ openssl s_client -CAfile /run/systemd/remote-pki/ca.crt -connect localhost:19532
...
Connecting to ::1
CONNECTED(00000003)
Can't use SSL_get_servername
depth=1 C=CZ, L=Brno, O=Foo, OU=Bar, CN=Test CA
verify error:num=79:invalid CA certificate
verify return:1
depth=1 C=CZ, L=Brno, O=Foo, OU=Bar, CN=Test CA
verify error:num=26:unsuitable certificate purpose
verify return:1
...
---
SSL handshake has read 1566 bytes and written 409 bytes
Verification error: unsuitable certificate purpose
---
New, TLSv1.3, Cipher is TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
Server public key is 2048 bit
This TLS version forbids renegotiation.
Compression: NONE
Expansion: NONE
No ALPN negotiated
Early data was not sent
Verify return code: 26 (unsuitable certificate purpose)
These tests are not interested in most addresses specified in the .network file.
As 10-many-address.conf drop-in config for the .network file contains so
many addresses, hopefully this improves test performance.
ExecStart= and friends for .service and .socket can be specified
multiple times.
This also checks all commands for .mount and .swap, not only for the
current control command.
If the target mount point is an automount, checking it for writeability
without triggering it first is iffy and yields different results based
on kernel version:
~# systemd-run --wait --pipe -p ProtectSystem=yes bash -xec 'uname -r; mount -l | grep boot; test ! -w /boot'
Running as unit: run-u36.service; invocation ID: f948ff4f3c8e4bcfba364ead94bd0ad9
+ uname -r
4.18.0-529.el8.x86_64
+ mount -l
+ grep boot
systemd-1 on /boot type autofs (rw,relatime,fd=43,pgrp=1,timeout=120,minproto=5,maxproto=5,direct,pipe_ino=356096)
+ test '!' -w /boot
Finished with result: exit-code
Main processes terminated with: code=exited/status=1
~# systemd-run --wait --pipe -p ProtectSystem=yes bash -xec 'uname -r; mount -l | grep boot; test ! -w /boot'
Running as unit: run-u274.service; invocation ID: ccc53ed63c3249348cf714f97a3a7026
+ uname -r
6.6.7-arch1-1
+ mount -l
+ grep boot
systemd-1 on /boot type autofs (rw,relatime,fd=95,pgrp=1,timeout=120,minproto=5,maxproto=5,direct,pipe_ino=730583)
+ test '!' -w /boot
Finished with result: success
Main processes terminated with: code=exited/status=0
One solution would be to use /boot/ instead of just /boot, which triggers
the automount during the check, but in that case the mount would happen
_after_ we apply the ProtectSystem= stuff, so the mount point would
be unexpectedly writable:
~# systemd-run --wait --pipe -p ProtectSystem=yes bash -xec 'uname -r; mount -l | grep boot; test ! -w /boot/ || mount -l | grep boot'
Running as unit: run-u282.service; invocation ID: 2154f6b4cbd34ddeb3e246cb7c991918
+ uname -r
6.6.7-arch1-1
+ mount -l
+ grep boot
systemd-1 on /boot type autofs (rw,relatime,fd=95,pgrp=1,timeout=120,minproto=5,maxproto=5,direct,pipe_ino=730583)
+ test '!' -w /boot/
+ mount -l
+ grep boot
systemd-1 on /boot type autofs (rw,relatime,fd=95,pgrp=1,timeout=120,minproto=5,maxproto=5,direct,pipe_ino=730583)
/dev/vda2 on /boot type vfat (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,nosymfollow,fmask=0077,dmask=0077,codepage=437,iocharset=ascii,shortname=mixed,utf8,errors=remount-ro)
Let's just trigger the (possible) automounts explicitly before we do any
checks to avoid all this stuff.
Also, when at it, check that ProtectSystem=yes|full correctly protects
the ESP mount as well.
Follow-up for 97bbb9cfbd.
Otherwise we might occasionally hit the start rate limit, as we restart
the service a bunch of times:
[ 3702.280886] testsuite-75.sh[1135]: + tee /tmp/tmp.wUL8bkJwrt
[ 3702.283684] testsuite-75.sh[1135]: {}
[ 3702.284254] testsuite-75.sh[46]: + restart_resolved
[ 3702.284302] testsuite-75.sh[46]: + systemctl stop systemd-resolved.service
[ 3702.310678] testsuite-75.sh[1140]: + systemctl is-failed systemd-resolved.service
[ 3702.316766] testsuite-75.sh[1141]: inactive
[ 3702.316998] testsuite-75.sh[46]: + systemctl start systemd-resolved.service
[ 3702.322315] systemd[1]: systemd-resolved.service: Start request repeated too quickly.
[ 3702.322343] systemd[1]: systemd-resolved.service: Failed with result 'start-limit-hit'.
[ 3702.322609] systemd[1]: Failed to start systemd-resolved.service - Network Name Resolution.
[ 3702.323619] systemctl[1142]: Job for systemd-resolved.service failed.
[ 3702.323839] systemctl[1142]: See "systemctl status systemd-resolved.service" and "journalctl -xeu systemd-resolved.service" for details.
[ 3702.325035] systemd[1]: testsuite-75.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
[ 3702.325391] systemd[1]: Failed to start testsuite-75.service - Tests for systemd-resolved.
Follow-up for b1384db11b and 6ef512c0bb.
This patch enables IFNAME_VALID_ALTERNATIVE for checks guarding the
parsing of RestrictNetworkInterfaces=.
The underlying implementation for this option already supports
altnames.
