IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
RFC4861 Neighbor Discovery – Sections 4.2 and 6.3.4
From section 4.2. Router Advertisement Message Format:
Cur Hop Limit 8-bit unsigned integer. The default value that
should be placed in the Hop Count field of the IP
header for outgoing IP packets. A value of zero
means unspecified (by this router).
Fixes#25780.
> Man page: crypttab.5
> Issue 1: Missing fullstop
> Issue 2: I<cipher=>, I<hash=>, I<size=> → B<cipher=>, B<hash=>, B<size=>
>
> "Force LUKS mode\\&. When this mode is used, the following options are "
> "ignored since they are provided by the LUKS header on the device: "
> "I<cipher=>, I<hash=>, I<size=>"
Seems OK to me. The full stop is there and has been for at least a few years. And we use <option> for the markup, which is appropriate here.
> Man page: crypttab.5
> Issue 1: Missing fullstop
> Issue 2: I<cipher=>, I<hash=>, I<keyfile-offset=>, I<keyfile-size=>, I<size=> → B<cipher=>, B<hash=>, B<keyfile-offset=>, B<keyfile-size=>, B<size=>
>
> "Use TrueCrypt encryption mode\\&. When this mode is used, the following "
> "options are ignored since they are provided by the TrueCrypt header on the "
> "device or do not apply: I<cipher=>, I<hash=>, I<keyfile-offset=>, I<keyfile-"
> "size=>, I<size=>"
Same.
> Man page: journalctl.1
> Issue 1: make be → may be
Fixed.
> Issue 2: below\\&. → below:
Fixed.
> Man page: journalctl.1
> Issue: Colon at the end?
>
> "The following commands are understood\\&. If none is specified the default "
> "is to display journal records\\&."
> msgstr ""
> "Die folgenden Befehle werden verstanden\\&. Falls keiner festgelegt ist, ist "
> "die Anzeige von Journal-Datensätzen die Vorgabe\\&."
This is a bit awkward, but I'm not sure how to fix it.
> Man page: kernel-install.8
> Issue: methods a fallback → methods fallback
It was correct, but I added a comma to make the sense clearer.
> Man page: loader.conf.5
> Issue 1: secure boot variables → Secure Boot variables
> Issue 2: one → one for (multiple times)
>
> "Supported secure boot variables are one database for authorized images, one "
> "key exchange key (KEK) and one platform key (PK)\\&. For more information, "
> "refer to the \\m[blue]B<UEFI specification>\\m[]\\&\\s-2\\u[2]\\d\\s+2, "
> "under Secure Boot and Driver Signing\\&. Another resource that describe the "
> "interplay of the different variables is the \\m[blue]B<EDK2 "
> "documentation>\\m[]\\&\\s-2\\u[3]\\d\\s+2\\&."
"one of" would sound strange. "One this and one that" is OK.
> Man page: loader.conf.5
> Issue: systemd-boot → B<systemd-boot>(7)
Fixed.
> Man page: logind.conf.5
> Issue: systemd-logind → B<systemd-logind>(8)
We use <filename>systemd-logind</> on subsequent references… I think that's good enough.
> Man page: nss-myhostname.8
> Issue: B<getent> → B<getent>(1)
Fixed.
> Man page: nss-resolve.8
> Issue: B<systemd-resolved> → B<systemd-resolved>(8)
The first reference does this, subsequent are shorter.
> Man page: os-release.5
> Issue: Portable Services → Portable Services Documentation?
Updated.
> Man page: pam_systemd_home.8
> Issue: auth and account use "reason", while session and password do not?
Reworded.
> Man page: portablectl.1
> Issue: In systemd-portabled.service(8): Portable Services Documentation
Updated.
> Man page: repart.d.5
> Issue: The partition → the partition
Fixed.
> Man page: repart.d.5
> Issue: B<systemd-repart> → B<systemd-repart>(8)
The first reference does this. I also change this one, because it's pretty far down in the text.
> Man page: systemd.1
> Issue: kernel command line twice?
>
> "Takes a boolean argument\\&. If false disables importing credentials from "
> "the kernel command line, qemu_fw_cfg subsystem or the kernel command line\\&."
Apparently this was fixed already.
> Man page: systemd-boot.7
> Issue: enrollement → enrollment
Fixed.
> Man page: systemd-cryptenroll.1
> Issue: multiple cases: any specified → the specified
Reworded.
> Man page: systemd-cryptenroll.1
> Issue: If this this → If this
Fixed tree-wide.
> Man page: systemd-cryptsetup-generator.8
> Issue: and the initrd → and in the initrd
"Is honoured by the initrd" is OK, because we often speak about the initrd as a single unit. But in the same paragraph we also used "in the initrd", which makes the other use look sloppy. I changed it to "in the initrd" everywhere in that file.
> Man page: systemd.directives.7
> Issue: Why are these two quoted (but not others)?
>
> "B<\\*(Aqh\\*(Aq>"
>
> B<\\*(Aqs\\*(Aq>"
>
> "B<\\*(Aqy\\*(Aq>"
This is autogenerated from files… We use slightly different markup in different files, and it's just too hard to make it consistent. We gave up on this.
> Man page: systemd.exec.5
> Issue 1: B<at>(1p) → B<at>(1)
> Issue 2: B<crontab>(1p) → B<crontab>(1)
Fixed.
> Man page: systemd.exec.5
> Issue: B<select()> → B<select>(2)
Fixed.
> Man page: systemd.exec.5
> Issue: qemu → B<qemu>(1)
The man page doesn't seem to be in any of the canonical places on the web.
I added a link to online docs.
> Man page: systemd.exec.5
> Issue: variable → variables
Seems to be fixed already.
> Man page: systemd-integritysetup-generator.8
> Issue: systemd-integritysetup-generator → B<systemd-integritysetup-generator>
I changed <filename> to <command>.
> Man page: systemd-integritysetup-generator.8
> Issue: superfluous comma at the end
Already fixed.
> Man page: systemd-measure.1
> Issue: (see B<--pcr-bank=>) below → (see B<--pcr-bank=> below)
Reworded.
> Man page: systemd-measure.1
> Issue: =PATH> → =>I<PATH>
Fixed.
> Man page: systemd-measure.1.po
> Issue: B<--bank=DIGEST> → B<--bank=>I<DIGEST>
Fixed.
> Man page: systemd.netdev.5
> Issue: os the → on the
Appears to have been fixed already.
> Man page: systemd.netdev.5
> Issue: Onboard → On-board (as in previous string)
Updated.
> Man page: systemd.network.5
> Issue: B<systemd-networkd> -> B<systemd-networkd>(8)
First reference does this, subsequent do not.
> Man page: systemd.network.5
> Issue: B<netlabelctl> → B<netlabelctl>(8)
First reference does this, subsequent do not.
> Man page: systemd.network.5
> Issue: Missing verb (aquired? configured?) in the half sentence starting with "or by a "
I dropped the comma.
> Man page: systemd-nspawn.1
> Issue: All host users outside of that range → All other host users
Reworded.
> # FIXME no effect → no effect\\&.
> #. type: Plain text
> #: archlinux debian-unstable fedora-rawhide mageia-cauldron opensuse-tumbleweed
> msgid ""
> "Whichever ID mapping option is used, the same mapping will be used for users "
> "and groups IDs\\&. If B<rootidmap> is used, the group owning the bind "
> "mounted directory will have no effect"
A period is added. Not sure if there's some other issue.
> Man page: systemd-oomd.service.8
> Issue: B<systemd> → B<systemd>(1)
Done.
> Man page: systemd.path.5
> Issue 1: B<systemd.exec>(1) → B<systemd.exec>(5)
> Issue 2: This section does not (yet?) exist
Fixed.
> Man page: systemd-pcrphase.service.8
> Issue 1: indicate phases into TPM2 PCR 11 ??
> Issue 2: Colon at the end of the paragraph?
Fixed.
> Man page: systemd-pcrphase.service.8
> Issue: final boot phase → final shutdown phase?
Updated.
> Man page: systemd-pcrphase.service.8
> Issue: for the the → for the
Fixed tree-wide.
> Man page: systemd-portabled.service.8
> Issue: In systemd-portabled.service(8): Portable Services Documentation
Updated.
> Man page: systemd-pstore.service.8
> Issue: Here and the following paragraphs: . → \\&. // Upstream: What does this comment mean? // You normally write \\&. for a full dot (full stop etc.); here you write only "." (i.e. a plain dot).
>
> "and we look up \"localhost\", nss-dns will send the following queries to "
> "systemd-resolved listening on 127.0.0.53:53: first \"localhost.foobar.com\", "
> "then \"localhost.barbar.com\", and finally \"localhost\". If (hopefully) the "
> "first two queries fail, systemd-resolved will synthesize an answer for the "
> "third query."
Looks all OK to me.
> Man page: systemd.resource-control.5
> Issue: Missing closing bracket after link to Control Groups version 1
Fixed.
> Man page: systemd-sysext.8
> Issue: In systemd-portabled.service(8): Portable Services Documentation
Updated.
> Man page: systemd.timer.5
> Issue 1: B<systemd.exec>(1) → B<systemd.exec>(5)
> Issue 2: This section does not (yet?) exist
Fixed.
> Man page: systemd.unit.5
> Issue: that is → that are
Fixed.
> Man page: systemd-veritysetup-generator.8
> Issue: systemd-veritysetup-generator → B<systemd-veritysetup-generator>
>
> "systemd-veritysetup-generator implements B<systemd.generator>(7)\\&."
>
> "systemd-veritysetup-generator understands the following kernel command line "
> "parameters:"
Updated.
> Man page: systemd-volatile-root.service.8
> Issue: initrdyes → Initrd
Fixed.
> Man page: sysupdate.d.5
> Issue: : → \\&. (As above in TRANSFER)
Updated.
> Man page: sysupdate.d.5
> Issue: some → certain
Updated.
> Man page: sysupdate.d.5
> Issue 1: i\\&.e\\& → I\\&.e\\&
Fixed.
> Issue 2: the image → the system
"image" seems correct.
> Man page: tmpfiles.d.5
> Issue: systemd-tmpfiles → B<systemd-tmpfiles>(8)
Updated.
Even if different preference is specified, the kernel merges multiple
routes with the same preference. This is problematic when a network has
multiple routers.
Fixes#25138.
New directive `NetLabel=` provides a method for integrating static and dynamic
network configuration into Linux NetLabel subsystem rules, used by Linux
Security Modules (LSMs) for network access control. The label, with suitable
LSM rules, can be used to control connectivity of (for example) a service with
peers in the local network. At least with SELinux, only the ingress can be
controlled but not egress. The benefit of using this setting is that it may be
possible to apply interface independent part of NetLabel configuration at very
early stage of system boot sequence, at the time when the network interfaces
are not available yet, with netlabelctl(8), and the per-interface configuration
with systemd-networkd once the interfaces appear later. Currently this feature
is only implemented for SELinux.
The option expects a single NetLabel label. The label must conform to lexical
restrictions of LSM labels. When an interface is configured with IP addresses,
the addresses and subnetwork masks will be appended to the NetLabel Fallback
Peer Labeling rules. They will be removed when the interface is
deconfigured. Failures to manage the labels will be ignored.
Example:
```
[DHCPv4]
NetLabel=system_u:object_r:localnet_peer_t:s0
```
With the above rules for interface `eth0`, when the interface is configured with
an IPv4 address of 10.0.0.123/8, `systemd-networkd` performs the equivalent of
`netlabelctl` operation
```
$ sudo netlabelctl unlbl add interface eth0 address:10.0.0.0/8 label:system_u:object_r:localnet_peer_t:s0
```
Result:
```
$ sudo netlabelctl -p unlbl list
...
interface: eth0
address: 10.0.0.0/8
label: "system_u:object_r:localnet_peer_t:s0"
...
```
Previous implementation of disabling rapid commit was broken, and
dropped by 308d01f3c4.
Let's re-introduce the option in the correct way, as some servers seem
to return borked message when the solicit message contain the rapid
commit option.
Closes#24065.
This reverts PR #23269 and its follow-up commit. Especially,
2299b1cae3 (partially), and
3cf63830ac.
The PR was merged without final approval, and has several issues:
- The NetLabel for static addresses are not assigned, as labels are
stored in the Address objects managed by Network, instead of Link.
- If NetLabel is specified for a static address, then the address
section will be invalid and the address will not be configured,
- It should be implemented with Request object,
- There is no test about the feature.
This reverts PR #22587 and its follow-up commit. More specifically,
2299b1cae3 (partially),
e176f85527,
ceb46a31a0, and
51bb9076ab.
The PR was merged without final approval, and has several issues:
- OSS fuzz reported issues in the conf parser,
- It calls synchrnous netlink call, it should not be especially in PID1,
- The importance of NFTSet for CGroup and DynamicUser may be
questionable, at least, there was no justification PID1 should support
it.
- For networkd, it should be implemented with Request object,
- There is no test for the feature.
Fixes#23711.
Fixes#23717.
Fixes#23719.
Fixes#23720.
Fixes#23721.
Fixes#23759.
New directives `NFTSet=`, `IPv4NFTSet=` and `IPv6NFTSet=` provide a method for
integrating configuration of dynamic networks into firewall rules with NFT
sets.
/etc/systemd/network/eth.network
```
[DHCPv4]
...
NFTSet=netdev:filter:eth_ipv4_address
```
```
table netdev filter {
set eth_ipv4_address {
type ipv4_addr
flags interval
}
chain eth_ingress {
type filter hook ingress device "eth0" priority filter; policy drop;
ip saddr != @eth_ipv4_address drop
accept
}
}
```
```
sudo nft list set netdev filter eth_ipv4_address
table netdev filter {
set eth_ipv4_address {
type ipv4_addr
flags interval
elements = { 10.0.0.0/24 }
}
}
```
New directive `NetLabel=` provides a method for integrating dynamic network
configuration into Linux NetLabel subsystem rules, used by Linux security
modules (LSMs) for network access control. The option expects a whitespace
separated list of NetLabel labels. The labels must conform to lexical
restrictions of LSM labels. When an interface is configured with IP addresses,
the addresses and subnetwork masks will be appended to the NetLabel Fallback
Peer Labeling rules. They will be removed when the interface is
deconfigured. Failures to manage the labels will be ignored.
Example:
```
[DHCP]
NetLabel=system_u:object_r:localnet_peer_t:s0
```
With the above rules for interface `eth0`, when the interface is configured with
an IPv4 address of 10.0.0.0/8, `systemd-networkd` performs the equivalent of
`netlabelctl` operation
```
$ sudo netlabelctl unlbl add interface eth0 address:10.0.0.0/8 label:system_u:object_r:localnet_peer_t:s0
```
Result:
```
$ sudo netlabelctl -p unlbl list
...
interface: eth0
address: 10.0.0.0/8
label: "system_u:object_r:localnet_peer_t:s0"
...
```
In the documentation, using the term "managed" for both the RA flag and
the DHCPv6 mode is confusing because the mode is referred to as
"solicit" both in the official DHCPv6 documentation (see RFC 8415) and
in the WithoutRA option.
Furthermore, calling the other RA flag "other information" or "other
address configuration" is confusing because its official name is simply
"other configuration" (see RFC 4861 and RFC 5175) and it isn't used to
assign IP addresses.
Rewrite the documentation for DHCPv6Client and WithoutRA to make it
clear that getting the "managed" RA flag triggers the same kind of DHCP
request as WithoutRA=solicit, whereas getting the "other configuration"
RA flag triggers the same kind of DHCP request as
WithoutRA=information-request.
"Link-local" and "link local" are used throughout man pages and program
output, with the former used far more than the latter. This commit makes
it consistent throughout the project.
