IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
POSIX.1-2001 declares usleep() function obsolete and POSIX.1-2008
removes it.
[Kay Sievers]
- include time.h
- use const for timespec
- scsi_id: drop rand() in retry loop
- modem-probe: rename msuspend() to msleep()
Directory lookups show up in profiling. The queue files are responsible
for a large proportion of file-related system calls in udev coldplug.
Instead of creating a file for each event, append their details to a
log file. The file is periodically rebuilt (garbage-collected) to
prevent it from growing indefinitely.
This single queue file replaces both the queue directory and the
uevent_seqnum file. On desktop systems the file tends not to grow
beyond one page. So it should also save a small amount of memory in
tmpfs.
Tests on a running EeePC indicate average savings of 5% *udevd* cpu time
as measured by oprofile. __link_path_walk is reduced from 1.5% to
1.3%. It is not completely clear where the rest of the gains come from.
In tests running ~400 events, the queue file is rebuilt about 5 times.
Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
The timeout wasn't working when settle was run as root:
# udevadm control --stop-exec-queue
# udevadm trigger
# udevadm settle --timeout=1
... (hangs)
Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
There's still a slight race condition when using udevadm settle, if the
udev daemon has a pending inotify event but hasn't yet generated the
"change" uevent for it, the kernel and udev sequence numbers will match
and settle will exit.
Now udevadm settle will send a control message to udevd, which will
respond by sending SIGUSR1 back to the waiting udevadm settle once it
has completed the main loop iteration in which it received the control
message.
If there were no pending inotify events, this will simply wake up the
udev daemon and allow settle to continue. If there are pending inotify
events, they are handled first in the main loop so when settle is
continued they will have been turned into uevents and the kernel
sequence number will have been incremented.
Since the inotify event is pending for udevd when the close() system
call returns (it's queued as part of the kernel handling for that system
call), and since the kernel sequence number is incremented by writing to
the uevent file (as udevd does), this solves the race.
When the settle continues, if there were pending inotify events that
udevd had not read, they are now pending uevents which settle can wait
for.
Signed-off-by: Scott James Remnant <scott@ubuntu.com>
It might be useful in some cases not to wait for "all" events.
$ read START < /sys/kernel/uevent_seqnum
$ (do something which may create uevents)
$ udevadm settle --seq-start=$START
