IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
In order to properly and predictably name netdevsim netdevices,
introduce a separate implementation, as the netdevices reside on a
specific netdevsim bus. Note that this applies only to netdevsim devices
created using sysfs, because those expose phys_port_name attribute.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Just moving code around, in preparation to allow the content creation
part to be used in other places.
On the surface of things, introspect_path() should be in bus-introspect.c, but
introspect_path() uses many static helper functions in bus-objects.c, so moving
it would require all of them to be exposed, which is too much trouble.
test-bus-introspect is updated to actually write the closing bracket.
We would check the size of sd_bus_vtable entries, requring one of the two known
sizes. But we should be able to extend the structure in the future, by adding
new fields, without breaking backwards compatiblity.
Incidentally, this check was what caused -EINVAL failures before, when programs
were compiled with systemd-242 and run with older libsystemd.
In 856ad2a86b sd_bus_add_object_vtable() and
sd_bus_add_fallback_vtable() were changed to take an updated sd_bus_vtable[]
array with additional 'features' and 'names' fields in the union.
The commit tried to check whether the old or the new table format is used, by
looking at the vtable[0].x.start.element_size field, on the assumption that the
added fields caused the structure size to grow. Unfortunately, this assumption
was false, and on arm32 (at least), the structure size is unchanged.
In libsystemd we use symbol versioning and a major.minor.patch semantic
versioning of the library name (major equals the number in the so-name). When
systemd-242 was released, the minor number was (correctly) bumped, but this is
not enough, because no new symbols were added or symbol versions changed. This
means that programs compiled with the new systemd headers and library could be
successfully linked to older versions of the library. For example rpm only
looks at the so-name and the list of versioned symbols, completely ignoring the
major.minor numbers in the library name. But the older library does not
understand the new vtable format, and would return -EINVAL after failing the
size check (on those architectures where the structure size did change, i.e.
all 64 bit architectures).
To force new libsystemd (with the functions that take the updated
sd_bus_vtable[] format) to be used, let's pull in a dummy symbol from the table
definition. This is a bit wasteful, because a dummy pointer has to be stored,
but the effect is negligible. In particular, the pointer doesn't even change
the size of the structure because if fits in an unused area in the union.
The number stored in the new unsigned integer is not checked anywhere. If the
symbol exists, we already know we have the new version of the library, so an
additional check would not tell us anything.
An alternative would be to make sd_bus_add_{object,fallback}_vtable() versioned
symbols, using .symver linker annotations. We would provide
sd_bus_add_{object,fallback}_vtable@LIBSYSTEMD_221 (for backwards
compatibility) and e.g. sd_bus_add_{object,fallback}_vtable@@LIBSYSTEMD_242
(the default) with the new implementation. This would work too, but is more
work. We would have to version at least those two functions. And it turns out
that the .symver linker instructions have to located in the same compilation
unit as the function being annotated. We first compile libsystemd.a, and then
link it into libsystemd.so and various other targets, including
libsystemd-shared.so, and the nss modules. If the .symver annotations were
placed next to the function definitions (in bus-object.c), they would influence
all targets that link libsystemd.a, and cause problems, because those functions
should not be exported there. To export them only in libsystemd.so, compilation
would have to be rearranged, so that the functions exported in libsystemd.so
would not be present in libsystemd.a, but a separate compilation unit containg
them and the .symver annotations would be linked solely into libsystemd.so.
This is certainly possible, but more work than the approach in this patch.
856ad2a86b has one more issue: it relies on the
undefined fields in sd_bus_vtable[] array to be zeros. But the structure
contains a union, and fields of the union do not have to be zero-initalized by
the compiler. This means that potentially, we could have garbarge values there,
for example when reading the old vtable format definition from the new function
implementation. In practice this should not be an issue at all, because vtable
definitions are static data and are placed in the ro-data section, which is
fully initalized, so we know that those undefined areas will be zero. Things
would be different if somebody defined the vtable array on the heap or on the
stack. Let's just document that they should zero-intialize the unused areas
in this case.
The symbol checking code had to be updated because otherwise gcc warns about a
cast from unsigned to a pointer.
So apparently there are two reasons why accept() can return EOPNOTSUPP:
because the socket is not a listening stream socket (or similar), or
because the incoming TCP connection for some reason wasn't acceptable to
the host. THe latter should be a transient error, as suggested on
accept(2). The former however should be considered fatal for
flush_accept(). Let's fix this by explicitly checking whether the socket
is a listening socket beforehand.
kernel-4.15's if_ether.h has a bug that the header does not provide
'struct ethhdr'. The bug is introduced by
6926e041a8920c8ec27e4e155efa760aa01551fd (4.15-rc8)
and fixed by da360299b6734135a5f66d7db458dcc7801c826a (4.16-rc3).
This makes systemd built with kernel-4.15 headers.
Fixes#12319.
The main testsuite service timeouts sporadically when waiting for
other testsuite-* units. As the test timeout is handled by
the "test executor" (test.sh), let's disable it for the service.
This should (hopefully) fix the test flakiness.
The L2TP_ATTR_UDP_ZERO_CSUM6_{TX,RX} attributes are introduced by
6b649feafe10b293f4bd5a74aca95faf625ae525, which is included in
kernel-3.16. To support older kernel, let's import the header.
Fixes#12300.
Now linux/in.h has better conflict detection with glibc's
netinet/in.h. So, let's import the headers.
Note that our code already have many workarounds for the conflict,
but in this commit does not drop them. Let's do that in the later
commits if this really helps.
tmp.conf was dealing with 2 different kind of paths: one dealing with general
temporary paths such as /var/tmp and /tmp and the other one dealing with
temporary directories owned by systemd.
If for example a user wants to adjust the age argument of the general paths
only, he had to overload the whole file which is cumbersome and error prone
since any future changes in tmp.conf shipped by systemd will be lost.
So this patch splits out tmp.conf so the systemd directories are dealt
separately in a dedicated conf file. It's named "systemd-tmp.conf" based on the
naming recommendation made in tmpfiles.d man page.
In practice it shouldn't cause any regression since it's very unlikely that
users override paths owned by systemd.
With gcc-9.0.1-0.10.fc30.x86_64:
../src/network/netdev/macsec.c: In function ‘config_parse_macsec_port’:
../src/network/netdev/macsec.c:584:24: warning: taking address of packed member of ‘struct <anonymous>’ may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Waddress-of-packed-member]
584 | dest = &c->sci.port;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/network/netdev/macsec.c:592:24: warning: taking address of packed member of ‘struct <anonymous>’ may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Waddress-of-packed-member]
592 | dest = &b->sci.port;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
(The alignment was probably OK, but it's nicer to avoid the warning anyway.)