IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
The original workaround didn't work, as `systemd-repart` kept failing
even when the `/dev/loopX` device was present:
```
[ 13.959419] H testsuite-58.sh[280]: + LOOP=/dev/loop1
[ 13.959636] H testsuite-58.sh[280]: + :
[ 13.959764] H testsuite-58.sh[280]: + test -e /dev/loop1
[ 13.959895] H testsuite-58.sh[280]: + break
[ 13.960023] H testsuite-58.sh[280]: + systemd-repart --pretty=yes --definitions=/tmp/testsuite-58-sector/ --seed=750b6cd5c4ae4012a15e7be3c29e6a47 --empty=require --dry-run=no /dev/loop1
[ 13.970538] H testsuite-58.sh[363]: Device '/dev/loop1' has no dm-crypt/dm-verity device, no need to look for underlying block device.
[ 13.970538] H testsuite-58.sh[363]: Failed to determine canonical path for '/dev/loop1': No such file or directory
[ 13.970538] H testsuite-58.sh[363]: Failed to open file or determine backing device of /dev/loop1: No such file or directory
```
It seems there exists a short time period that we cannot see the
loopback device after `losetup` is finished:
```
testsuite-58.sh[367]: ++ losetup -b 1024 -P --show -f /tmp/testsuite-58-sector-1024.img
kernel: loop1: detected capacity change from 0 to 204800
testsuite-58.sh[285]: + LOOP=/dev/loop1
testsuite-58.sh[285]: + systemd-repart --pretty=yes --definitions=/tmp/testsuite-58-sector/ --seed=750b6cd5c4ae4012a15e7be3c29e6a47 --empty=require --dry-run=no /dev/loop1
testsuite-58.sh[368]: Device '/dev/loop1' has no dm-crypt/dm-verity device, no need to look for underlying block device.
testsuite-58.sh[368]: Failed to determine canonical path for '/dev/loop1': No such file or directory
testsuite-58.sh[368]: Failed to open file or determine backing device of /dev/loop1: No such file or directory
```
The Ubuntu CI on ppc64el seems to have a issue on tmpfs, and files
may not be fsynced. See c10caebb98.
For safety, let's use /var/tmp to store disk images.
We would remove stuff only if successful, so repeated invocations would
trivially fail.
Also drop "-f", so that if we expect to remove something, it must be there.
Add 'reattach' verb to portablectl, and corresponding DBUS interface
to systemd-portabled.
Takes the same parameters as 'attach', but it will do a 'detach' (and
it will refuse to proceed if it cannot be done) first, matching on
the unversioned prefix of the new image. Eg:
portablectl reattach /tmp/foo_2.raw
will cause foo_1.raw to be detached, and foo_2.raw to be attached.
The key difference with a manual 'detach old' plus 'attach new' is that
the running units are not disturbed until after the attach completed,
and if --now is passed they are then restarted.
A 'detach' is not allowed normally if the units are running.
By using a restart-after-deploy method, 'reattach' allows for minimal
interruption of service and also for features that only work on restart
(eg: file descriptor store) to work as intended.
The DBUS interface returns two lists: first the removals from the detach
that were not immediately re-added in the attach, so that the caller
can stop the relevant units, and then the list of additions that are
either new or updates, so that the caller can restart/enable the
relevant units. portablectl already implements this with the existing
--now/--enable switches.
