IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
The netlink socket is now used by udev event processes. We should take
care not to pass it to the programs they execute. This is the same way
the inotify fd was handled.
Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Instead of of our own private monitor socket, we send the
processed event back to our netlink socket, to the multicast
group 2 -- so any number of users can listen to udev events,
just like they can listen to kernel emitted events on group 1.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 16:00, Matthias Schwarzott <zzam@gentoo.org> wrote:
found out how the error occurs:
It is a difference between
A. udevadm test /sys/class/mem/null/
and
B. udevadm test /sys/class/mem/null
Case A was the case that showed the error behaviour. It seems udevadm is
confused by the trailing slash. This behaviour seems to be there since ages.
There's still a slight race condition when using udevadm settle, if the
udev daemon has a pending inotify event but hasn't yet generated the
"change" uevent for it, the kernel and udev sequence numbers will match
and settle will exit.
Now udevadm settle will send a control message to udevd, which will
respond by sending SIGUSR1 back to the waiting udevadm settle once it
has completed the main loop iteration in which it received the control
message.
If there were no pending inotify events, this will simply wake up the
udev daemon and allow settle to continue. If there are pending inotify
events, they are handled first in the main loop so when settle is
continued they will have been turned into uevents and the kernel
sequence number will have been incremented.
Since the inotify event is pending for udevd when the close() system
call returns (it's queued as part of the kernel handling for that system
call), and since the kernel sequence number is incremented by writing to
the uevent file (as udevd does), this solves the race.
When the settle continues, if there were pending inotify events that
udevd had not read, they are now pending uevents which settle can wait
for.
Signed-off-by: Scott James Remnant <scott@ubuntu.com>
The problem was strncpy() doesn't stop after writing the terminating
NUL; by definition it goes on to zero the entire buffer.
I spy another use of strncpy in udev_device_add_property_from_string(),
which is responsible for another ~1% user cpu time...
Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Since we already know the length, use memcpy() instead.
Measured 2% _user_ cpu time reduction on EeePC coldplug.
Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Use calloc to request cleared memory instead.
Kernel and libc conspire to make this more efficient.
Also, replace one malloc() + strcpy() with strdup().
Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
