IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
read_one_line_file() always returns <= 0, so the code was OK, but let's write
the check a bit differently to make it obvious that min_max is always set.
The comment above makes the intent of the code pretty clear:
"use security2_protocol == NULL as indicator".
So revert the condition in the check and fix the logic in the comment while
at it.
The question is how this could have ever worked: if BS->LocateProtocol
(which is supposedly optional) ever failed, we'd crash here. Strange.
Found by coverity.
m->encrypted is set when fstype=="crypto_LUKS", but this is not obvious when
reading decrypt_partition(). Just check if passphrase is set before using
it.
This fixes the (mostly theoretical, since we're only parsing data that we write
ourselves) memleak when iif or oif is deserialized multiple times. Unfortunately
it does not fix the memleak when rule is freed, but that'll require a bigger
effort.
Let's just say that the code wasn't fully functional ;(
Since we only had the parser for serialization, and not the writer, we are
free to change the format. So while at it, let's use shorter names in the
serialization format that match the surrounding style.
If test-resolve is running in some CI environment that doesn't have
reliably working DNS, it's a good idea not to hang forever, let's
time-out after 20s
Let's always use the same logic when parsing error numbers, i.e. use
parse_errno() here too, to unify some code, and tighten the checks a
bit.
This also allows clients to pass errors as symbolic names. Probably
nothing we want to advertise too eagerly (since new daemons generating
this on old service managers won't understand), but still pretty
useful I think, in particular in scripting languages and such, where the
numeric error numbers might not be readily available.
Currenly the only way to remove fds from the fdstore is to fully
stop the service, or to somehow trigger POLLERR/POLLHUP on the fd, in
which case systemd will remove the fd automatically.
Let's add another way: a new message that can be sent to remove fds
explicitly, given their name.
Of course, it's not really a valid sd_notify() message if multiple of
these fields are used in one, but let's handle this somewhat gracefully,
by only processing one of them, and ignoring the rest.
Let's optimize things a bit for the non-debug case. No change in
behaviour.
Main reason to do this is not so much the speed benefit though, but
merely to isolate the code from its surroundings more.
