IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
The immediate motivation is to allow fuzz-systemctl-parse-argv to cover also
the other code paths. p_i_s_n is not getting set (and it probably shouldn't),
so the fuzzer would only cover the paths for ./systemctl, and not ./reboot,
etc. Looking at argv[0] instead, which is passed as part of the fuzzer data,
fixes that.
But I think in general it's more correct to look at argv[0] here: after all we
have all the information available through local variables and shouldn't go out
of our way to look at a global.
This lists numerical signal values:
$ systemctl --signal list
SIGNAL NAME
1 SIGHUP
2 SIGINT
3 SIGQUIT
...
62 SIGRTMIN+28
63 SIGRTMIN+29
64 SIGRTMIN+30
This is useful when trying to kill e.g. systemd with a specific signal number
using kill. kill doesn't accept our fancy signal names like RTMIN+4, so one
would have to calculate that value somehow. Doing
systemctl --signal list | grep -F RTMIN+4
is a nice way of doing that.
It seems there is another meson (0.57.0) regression preventing clang from
building systemd with --optimization=3 -Db_lto=true
By analogy with https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/pull/5199 let's just switch
to 0.56.2 for the time being
A previous commit made sure that when one of our own packets is looped
back to us, we ignore it. But let's go one step further, and refuse
operation if we notice the server we talk to is our own. This way we
won't generate unnecessary traffic and can return a cleaner error.
Fixes: #17413
Let's be more precise in naming this function, after all this doesn#t
actually check if the packet is really ours, but just that the source IP
address is a local one. Hence name it that way.
(This is preparation to add a helper that checks if packet belongs to
local transaction later on)
Let's add some overflow checks. Also, if 0 records are reserved, use
this as indication that a copy shall be done and do not grow the answer
beyond the current size.
Apparently, there are plenty routers in place that report an incorrect
RR count in the packets: they declare more RRs than are actually
included.
Let's accept these responses, but let's downgrade them to baseline, i.e.
let's suppress OPT in this case: if they don't even get the RR count
right, let's operate on the absolute baseline, and not bother with
anything fancier such as EDNS.
Prompted-by: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/12841#issuecomment-724063973Fixes: #3980
Most likely fixes: #12841
We have a chicken and egg problem: validation of DNSSEC signatures
doesn't work without a correct clock, but to set the correct clock we
need to contact NTP servers which requires resolving a hostname, which
would normally require DNSSEC validation.
Let's break the cycle by excluding NTP hostname resolution from
validation for now.
Of course, this leaves NTP traffic unprotected. To cover that we need
NTPSEC support, which we can add later.
Fixes: #5873#15607
The general idea is that when a unit file is "linked" (i.e. installed by
symlinking from outside of the search paths), the *destination* name is
irrelevant. It doesn't even have to be a valid unit name, or to match the type
or instance value. The obvious collorary is that we shouldn't look at the
symlink destination name to derive the unit name, instance value, or anything
else at all.
When building the name map, when we find a linked unit (possibly at the end
of a series of alias redirects), store the *source* of the final symlink as the
fragment path. This has two effects:
- we stop looking at the *target* file name to derive unit info, i.e. actually
implement the stuff described in the first paragraph.
- we load the unit fragment through the symlink. If someone were to remove the
symlink, we'll not load the unit. This seems like the right thing.
Fixes#18058.
Before this change, we were generally quite confused about unit alises for
linked units. Fortunately most poeple use the same symlink source and target,
so in practice we wouldn't hit this too often.
In unit_load_fragment() a comment is added to explain what we're doing there.
Let's be a bit more helpful when refusing jobs on units that failed to
load properly. We already have explicit D-Bus errors for the error
conditions that are common and expected (such as "not found"), but for
the rest we so far generate a fairly cryptic message.
Let's try to be friendlier towards users and suggest what to do on such
errors.
Fixes: #16487
LLMNR/mDNS don't support DNSSEC, hence there's no point in routing any
lookups asking for DNSSEC there.
This speeds up looking up DNSSEC RRs for top-level domains, since we
don't have to wait for LLMNR to complete.
