IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This reverts commit cb0e818f7c.
After this was merged, some design and implementation issues were discovered,
see the discussion in #18782 and #19385. They certainly can be fixed, but so
far nobody has stepped up, and we're nearing a release. Hopefully, this feature
can be merged again after a rework.
Fixes#19345.
When checking the unit state after `systemctl freeze|thaw` we can be
"too fast" and get the intermediate state (freezing/thawing) which we're
not interested in. Let's wait a bit and try to get the state again in
such cases to avoid unnecessary flakiness.
```
[ 29.390203] testsuite-38.sh[218]: + state=thawing
[ 29.390203] testsuite-38.sh[218]: + '[' thawing = running ']'
[ 29.390203] testsuite-38.sh[218]: + echo 'error: unexpected freezer state, expected: running, actual: thawing'
[ 29.390203] testsuite-38.sh[218]: error: unexpected freezer state, expected: running, actual: thawing
[ 29.390203] testsuite-38.sh[218]: + exit 1
```
test-loop-block needs to run in qemu, so we are currently not
testing it in the CI. Run it by itself in a separate job from
TEST-02-UNITTESTS to avoid slowing that suite down.
Fixes https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/19966
Disable it in the bionic-* CI for now, as it's affected by
the same uevent ordering issue as TEST-50-DISSECT which makes
it flaky.
In many CI runs I noticed a race where we check the "active" state a bit
too early where the unit is still in the "inactive" state, causing the
`is-failed` check to fail. Mitigate this by waiting even if the unit is
in the inactive state and introduce a "safe net" which checks whether
the unit is not restarting indefinitely or more than it should (as
described in the original issue #3166).
Example:
```
[ 5.757784] testsuite-11.sh[216]: + systemctl --no-block start fail-on-restart.service
[ 5.853657] testsuite-11.sh[222]: ++ systemctl show --value --property ActiveState fail-on-restart.service
[ 5.946044] testsuite-11.sh[216]: + active_state=inactive
[ 5.946044] testsuite-11.sh[216]: + [[ inactive == \a\c\t\i\v\a\t\i\n\g ]]
[ 5.946044] testsuite-11.sh[216]: + [[ inactive == \a\c\t\i\v\e ]]
[ 5.946044] testsuite-11.sh[216]: + systemctl is-failed fail-on-restart.service
[ 5.946816] systemd[1]: fail-on-restart.service: Passing 0 fds to service
[ 5.946913] systemd[1]: fail-on-restart.service: About to execute false
[ 5.947011] systemd[1]: fail-on-restart.service: Forked false as 228
[ 5.947093] systemd[1]: fail-on-restart.service: Changed dead -> start
[ 5.947172] systemd[1]: Starting Fail on restart...
[ 5.947272] systemd[228]: fail-on-restart.service: Executing: false
[ 5.960553] testsuite-11.sh[227]: activating
[ 5.965188] testsuite-11.sh[216]: + exit 1
[ 6.011838] systemd[1]: Received SIGCHLD from PID 228 (4).
[ 6.012510] systemd[1]: fail-on-restart.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
[ 6.012638] systemd[1]: fail-on-restart.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
[ 6.012834] systemd[1]: fail-on-restart.service: Service will restart (restart setting)
[ 6.012963] systemd[1]: fail-on-restart.service: Changed running -> failed
[ 6.013081] systemd[1]: fail-on-restart.service: Unit entered failed state.
```
It's hard to trigger the failure to exit the rate limit state in
isolation as it needs multiple event sources in order to show that it
gets stuck in the queue. Hence why this is an extended test.
For "systemd-tmpfiles --cleanup", when the "Age" parameter
is specified, the criteria for deletion is determined from
the path's last modification timestamp ("mtime"), its last
access timestamp ("atime") and its last status change
timestamp ("ctime").
For instance, if one of those paths to be cleaned up are
opened, it results in the modification of "atime", which
results file system entry to not be removed because the
default aging algorithm would skip the entry.
Add an optional "age-by" argument by extending the "Age"
parameter to restrict the clean-up for a particular type
of file timestamp, which can be specified in "tmpfiles.d"
as follows:
[age-by:]cleanup-age, where age-by is "[abcmACBM]+"
For example:
d /foo/bar - - - abM:1m -
Would clean-up any files that were not accessed and created,
or directories that were not modified less than a minute ago
in "/foo/bar".
Fixes: #17002
"systemd-testsuite" gets in the way when grepping for "testsuite-*.sh".
Also, the name doesn't matter for anything, so let's just use something
very short to save space.
This commit applies the filtering imposed by LogLevelMax on a unit's
processes to messages logged by PID1 about the unit as well.
The target use case for this feature is a service that runs on a timer
many times an hour, where the system administrator decides that writing
a generic success message to the journal every few minutes or seconds
adds no diagnostic value and isn't worth the clutter or disk I/O.
We want to use the result in a shell pipeline hence use -P mode (pipe
mode) instead of -t mode (interactive tty mode) for systemd-run.
This shouldn't change much about the test, but is slightly more correct
(and quicker).
We would remove stuff only if successful, so repeated invocations would
trivially fail.
Also drop "-f", so that if we expect to remove something, it must be there.
oomd works way better with swap, so let's make the test less flaky by
configuring a swap device for it. This also allows us to drop the ugly
`cat`s from the load-generating script.
Cover the case where a service is recovered out of reloading state via
a restart Restart= configuration.
Signed-off-by: Peter Morrow <pemorrow@linux.microsoft.com>
The test appears to be occasionally failing. It uses systemd-run to echo
'hello world' into a namespaced journal and then uses journalctl to look for it,
but it doesn't wait.
In the failed runs it can't find it, but the automated journal dump shows
the message at the end.
Use --wait to avoid races.
'! grep -v' does *not* test that there are no matching lines.
Instead, it checks that whether there are any non-matching lines.
And of course, for the test to fail, '! grep' cannot be part of
an expression with &&.