IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Previously we checked the SysV priority value to figure out if a SysV
unit was enabled or not, since th value was mostly read from the S
startup links. Since we read this value from the LSB headers as a
fallback we hence ended up considering a lot more services enabled than
were actually enabled.
This patch adds an explicit boolean which encodes whether a sysv service
is enabled or not via S links.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615293
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07/28/2010 05:57 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:43, Lennart Poettering
> <lennart@poettering.net> wrote:
>> On Mon, 26.07.10 16:42, Daniel J Walsh (dwalsh@redhat.com) wrote:
>>> tcontext=system_u:object_r:device_t:s0 tclass=chr_file
>>> type=1400 audit(1280174589.476:7): avc: denied { read } for pid=1
>>> comm="systemd" name="autofs" dev=devtmpfs ino=9482
>>> scontext=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0
>>> tcontext=system_u:object_r:device_t:s0 tclass=chr_file
>>> type=1400 audit(1280174589.476:8): avc: denied { read } for pid=1
>>> comm="systemd" name="autofs" dev=devtmpfs ino=9482
>>> scontext=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0
>>> tcontext=system_u:object_r:device_t:s0 tclass=chr_file
>>>
>>> Lennart, we talked about this earlier. I think this is caused by the
>>> modprobe calls to create /dev/autofs. Since udev is not created at the
>>> point that init loads the kernel modules, the devices get created with
>>> the wrong label. Once udev starts the labels get fixed.
>>>
>>> I can allow init_t to read device_t chr_files.
>>
>> Hmm, I think a cleaner fix would be to make systemd relabel this device
>> properly before accessing it? Given that this is only one device this
>> should not be a problem for us to maintain, I think? How would the
>> fixing of the label work? Would we have to spawn restorecon for this, or
>> can we actually do this in C without too much work?
>
> I guess we can just do what udev is doing, and call setfilecon(), with
> a context of an earlier matchpathcon().
>
> Kay
> _______________________________________________
> systemd-devel mailing list
> systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Here is the updated patch with a fix for the labeling of /dev/autofs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkxQMyoACgkQrlYvE4MpobNviACfWgxsjW2xzz1qznFex8RVAQHf
gIEAmwRmRcLvGqYtwQaZ3WKIg8wmrwNk
=pC2e
