mirror of
https://github.com/systemd/systemd.git
synced 2025-03-01 08:58:29 +03:00
The point here is to compare speed of hashmap_destroy with free and a different freeing function, to the implementation details of hashmap_clear can be evaluated. Results: current code: /* test_hashmap_free (slow, 1048576 entries) */ string_hash_ops test took 2.494499s custom_free_hash_ops test took 2.640449s string_hash_ops test took 2.287734s custom_free_hash_ops test took 2.557632s string_hash_ops test took 2.299791s custom_free_hash_ops test took 2.586975s string_hash_ops test took 2.314099s custom_free_hash_ops test took 2.589327s string_hash_ops test took 2.319137s custom_free_hash_ops test took 2.584038s code with a patch which restores the "fast path" using: for (idx = skip_free_buckets(h, 0); idx != IDX_NIL; idx = skip_free_buckets(h, idx + 1)) in the case where both free_key and free_value are either free or NULL: /* test_hashmap_free (slow, 1048576 entries) */ string_hash_ops test took 2.347013s custom_free_hash_ops test took 2.585104s string_hash_ops test took 2.311583s custom_free_hash_ops test took 2.578388s string_hash_ops test took 2.283658s custom_free_hash_ops test took 2.621675s string_hash_ops test took 2.334675s custom_free_hash_ops test took 2.601568s So the test is noisy, but there clearly is no significant difference with the "fast path" restored. I'm surprised by this, but it shows that the current "safe" implementation does not cause a performance loss. When the code is compiled with optimization, those times are significantly lower (e.g. 1.1s and 1.4s), but again, there is no difference with the "fast path" restored. The difference between string_hash_ops and custom_free_hash_ops is the additional cost of global modification and the extra function call.
systemd - System and Service Manager
Details
General information about systemd can be found in the systemd Wiki.
Information about build requirements is provided in the README file.
Consult our NEWS file for information about what's new in the most recent systemd versions.
Please see the Hacking guide for information on how to hack on systemd and test your modifications.
Please see our Contribution Guidelines for more information about filing GitHub Issues and posting GitHub Pull Requests.
When preparing patches for systemd, please follow our Coding Style Guidelines.
If you are looking for support, please contact our mailing list or join our IRC channel.
Stable branches with backported patches are available in the stable repo.
Languages
C
89.2%
Python
5.3%
Shell
4.1%
Meson
1.2%