IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
* Add CSS data in config.py and install it
* Strip out all hardcoded colors and use style class annotations
* Fix colors to be more theme appropriate to fix dark theme look
Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
We should always have something selected, there's not really any
point to allow de-selecting a row that I can think of, and it brings
up some weird menu UI.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1679577
Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
These were removed from the Details dialog previously, but I forgot
to remove them from addhardware too
Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
For the dialog flow, these options are the same, the only effect
is that there's no longer an initial network boot phase.
PXE is dependent on an external server setup that is not common
in the scheme of things, so giving it a first class option on the
front of the new VM wizard isn't really sensible. Users that want
to PXE boot can easily do so via the 'customize before install'
option, or just manually create a VM and edit the boot device as
they see fit.
Explicitly advertising a Manual option is nicer for users that
just want to create a VM and deal with install later, among many
other minor use cases.
Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
Add an info message that these can be set via the
'Customize before install' option. Duplicating this doesn't add a ton
of value here IMO
Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
And drop the explicit forward device listing. Similar to what
we did with bridge/macvtap domain <interface>
Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
Similar to the bridge option. We will be removing the explicit
device listing support soon, so this will be required for specifying
a macvtap device
Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
Some related bits were discussed here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/virt-tools-list/2019-June/msg00117.html
"""
* macvtap is kinda problematic in general because it doesn't provide
out of the box host<->guest communication, and it requires a
special XML option just to get working ipv6. Users that know they
want it usually know this distinction, but if someone chooses it
without understanding the implications it can cause confusion.
This puts it hovering the intermediate/advanced user line which
makes me want to not advertise it as prominently as we currently do,
with an explicit list of host interfaces
"""
Part of this is that the only source_mode that will work in a useful
way for the vast majority of users is mode=bridge. Any of the other
modes either require special hardware, permissions, or other
configuration. Default to bridge mode. The XML editor is there for
anyone that knows they need something different
Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
portgroups are a way to group logical chunks of settings inside
a <network> object. They are a quite advanced feature that I expect
many few users are using, and the ones that are using it are certainly
advanced enough to edit the XML directly.
Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
This is pretty obscure, and requires a large amount of UI surface
to handle correctly. Users can use the XML editor if they know they
need or want this.
Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
This was proposed here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/virt-tools-list/2019-June/msg00117.html
"""
* disk: bus editing: maybe keep this for the customize wizard, but
it should go away for existing disks, changing it for an existing VM is
definitely a 'shoot yourself in the foot' type of thing for most users
"""
Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
This was proposed here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/virt-tools-list/2019-June/msg00117.html
"""
* UI maxmem and maxcpu notions, and related memballoon and cpu hotplug
operations. These have been in the UI forever but I'm not sure people
actually use them. cpu hotplug has always been a mess, and unless the
user plans ahead by setting a high maxmem value ballooning is only good
for reducing memory. These all sound like advanced usage to me that
just confuses the typical usecase of adding more mem or vcpus to an
offline VM. And the hotplug operations with virsh are simple to invoke.
So I'd like to drop this from the UI
"""
The remaining field sets both max and current memory in the
inactive XML
Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
This was proposed here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/virt-tools-list/2019-June/msg00117.html
"""
* UI maxmem and maxcpu notions, and related memballoon and cpu hotplug
operations. These have been in the UI forever but I'm not sure people
actually use them. cpu hotplug has always been a mess, and unless the
user plans ahead by setting a high maxmem value ballooning is only good
for reducing memory. These all sound like advanced usage to me that
just confuses the typical usecase of adding more mem or vcpus to an
offline VM. And the hotplug operations with virsh are simple to invoke.
So I'd like to drop this from the UI
"""
The remaining UI field now sets both maximum and current VCPU
allocation.
Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
This was proposed here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/virt-tools-list/2019-June/msg00117.html
"""
* network virtualport configuration: this is some really obscure
stuff for configuring VEPA for macvtap devices. I don't think it gets
any usage in practice. I think a smaller subset of this UI is shared
with openswitch config but I believe it's just a single field, we
could keep that even though I don't think many people use it either
"""
This removes it all. The openvswitch piece was not properly wired
up anyways, since it requires setting virtualport type for a bridge.
For users that know they need that, they can add it via the XML
editor.
Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
This was proposed here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/virt-tools-list/2019-June/msg00117.html
The default driver_io value we use seems to be sufficient. It's very
rare to hear that users need to change the value to something
different, and if they do, they are advanced enough users that can
edit the XML directly IMO.
Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
This is another advanced feature with a limited appeal. Users that
know they need this can set it directly with the XML editor
Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
This is a very advanced field that is only shown for a quite
advanced disk device='lun' config. Users that know they need this
can easily set the value via the XML editor
Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
This was proposed here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/virt-tools-list/2019-June/msg00117.html
"""
* disk: storage format: this was from before the days when we
storage-ified everything and we could get the disk format wrong, telling
qemu it has a raw image when it's qcow2. shouldn't be needed anymore for
normal virt usage
"""
Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
This was proposed here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/virt-tools-list/2019-June/msg00117.html
"""
* disk: serial: I know this is useful in some cases but seems quite
obscure. I think the XML editor is fine unless there's some common
usecase I'm missing
"""
Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
This was discussed here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/virt-tools-list/2019-June/msg00117.html
tlsPort is an advanced config feature. With the XML editing support,
it's less important to have this as a first class UI element. Users
that know they need this setting can set it directly in the XML
Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
Removing this was discussed here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/virt-tools-list/2019-June/msg00117.html
For a decade, qemu and xen and virt-manager work together to
make setting a manual keymap redundant. Advertising it in the UI does
more harm than good, because users may think they need to specify
one when in the vast majority of cases it will give worse behavior.
With the XML editing UI, users still have a way to do this by hand
if they really know what they are doing.
Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
This adds a field in gsettings and preferences UI to enable
XML editing. It's off by default. The XML tab page is still visible,
but the textview is not editable, and there's a warning at the top:
XML editing is disabled in 'Preferences'.
Only enable it if you know what you are doing.
When the setting is enabled, the warning goes away and the textview
is editable. This puts a roadblock up for people that don't know what
they are doing, but still advertises the feature and keeps the
UI surface difference fairly small between on/off states.
The XML editor ui is a two tabbed notebook, one 'Details' tab
and one 'XML' tab. The latter has a gtksourceview and allows editing
the raw libvirt XML for whatever the selected object is.
API users will programmatically insert the xmleditor notebook into
their UI, with the existing UI under the details tab.
vmmVMWindow handles all the menuing, and coordinating between the
console, snapshots, and details panel. Simplifies the details
code a bit which will help when we add xmlediting
Name and forward mode config are always visible. ipv4, ipv6, and
domain name are under their own expanders which are collapsed by
default.
This will fit better with the XML editor pattern and reduce the
urge to squeeze more UI elements into the now smaller wizard
Rather than a mix of radio buttons and other combo boxes.
This follows the pattern we more commonly use in other UI, and
makes it easier to hide UI elements that aren't relevant for
specific choices, like the possibly large SR-IOV selector
This wizard is sufficiently obscure that I don't think it's
really valuable to try to explain networking concepts with
UI labels. If users don't know what they are trying to create
by using this wizard, there's no way we are going to adequately
explain to them what they are looking at. The example values
should be self explanatory enough anyways
This only applies for inter VM traffic when ipv6 networking is
disabled, which IMO is pretty obscure. If users want ipv6
connectivity, just enabling ipv6 will handle it appropriately
