sin/samba-mirror
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/samba-team/samba.git synced 2025-03-12 20:58:37 +03:00
Code
samba-mirror/source4/setup/tests/blackbox_supported_features.sh

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

87 lines
1.9 KiB
Bash
Raw Normal View History

samba_dsdb: Use and maintain compatibleFeatures and requiredFeatures in @SAMBA_DSDB This will allow us to introduce new database features that are backward compatible from the point of view of older versions of Samba, but which will be damaged by modifying the database with such a version. For example, if linked attributes are stored in sorted order in 4.7, and this change, without any values in current_supportedFeatures is itself included in 4.6, then our sortedLinks are backward compatible to that release. That is with 4.6 (including this patch) which doesn't care about ordering -- but a downgraded 4.7 database used by 4.6 will be broken when later used with 4.7. If we add a 'sortedLinks' feature flag in compatibleFeatures, we can detect that. This will allow us to determine if the database still contains unsorted links, as that information allows us to make the code handling links much more efficient. We won't add the actual flag until all the code is in place. Andrew wrote the actual code and Douglas wrote the tests, and they cross-reviewed. Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Piar-programmed-with: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> selftest: check for database features flags
2017-01-12 16:51:45 +13:00
#!/bin/sh
if [ $# -lt 1 ]; then
s4:setup: Reformat shell scripts shfmt -f source4/setup/ | xargs shfmt -w -p -i 0 -fn Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org> Reviewed-by: Pavel Filipenský <pfilipensky@samba.org>
2022-02-23 12:03:50 +01:00
cat <<EOF
samba_dsdb: Use and maintain compatibleFeatures and requiredFeatures in @SAMBA_DSDB This will allow us to introduce new database features that are backward compatible from the point of view of older versions of Samba, but which will be damaged by modifying the database with such a version. For example, if linked attributes are stored in sorted order in 4.7, and this change, without any values in current_supportedFeatures is itself included in 4.6, then our sortedLinks are backward compatible to that release. That is with 4.6 (including this patch) which doesn't care about ordering -- but a downgraded 4.7 database used by 4.6 will be broken when later used with 4.7. If we add a 'sortedLinks' feature flag in compatibleFeatures, we can detect that. This will allow us to determine if the database still contains unsorted links, as that information allows us to make the code handling links much more efficient. We won't add the actual flag until all the code is in place. Andrew wrote the actual code and Douglas wrote the tests, and they cross-reviewed. Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Piar-programmed-with: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> selftest: check for database features flags
2017-01-12 16:51:45 +13:00
Usage: blackbox_supported_features.sh PREFIX
EOF
s4:setup: Reformat shell scripts shfmt -f source4/setup/ | xargs shfmt -w -p -i 0 -fn Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org> Reviewed-by: Pavel Filipenský <pfilipensky@samba.org>
2022-02-23 12:03:50 +01:00
exit 1
samba_dsdb: Use and maintain compatibleFeatures and requiredFeatures in @SAMBA_DSDB This will allow us to introduce new database features that are backward compatible from the point of view of older versions of Samba, but which will be damaged by modifying the database with such a version. For example, if linked attributes are stored in sorted order in 4.7, and this change, without any values in current_supportedFeatures is itself included in 4.6, then our sortedLinks are backward compatible to that release. That is with 4.6 (including this patch) which doesn't care about ordering -- but a downgraded 4.7 database used by 4.6 will be broken when later used with 4.7. If we add a 'sortedLinks' feature flag in compatibleFeatures, we can detect that. This will allow us to determine if the database still contains unsorted links, as that information allows us to make the code handling links much more efficient. We won't add the actual flag until all the code is in place. Andrew wrote the actual code and Douglas wrote the tests, and they cross-reviewed. Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Piar-programmed-with: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> selftest: check for database features flags
2017-01-12 16:51:45 +13:00
fi
PREFIX="$1"
shift 1
DBPATH=$PREFIX/supported-features
fix blackbox_supported_features: mkdir -p its directory Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
2017-02-10 12:30:59 +13:00
mkdir -p $DBPATH
s4:setup: Reformat shell scripts shfmt -f source4/setup/ | xargs shfmt -w -p -i 0 -fn Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org> Reviewed-by: Pavel Filipenský <pfilipensky@samba.org>
2022-02-23 12:03:50 +01:00
. $(dirname $0)/../../../testprogs/blackbox/subunit.sh
samba_dsdb: Use and maintain compatibleFeatures and requiredFeatures in @SAMBA_DSDB This will allow us to introduce new database features that are backward compatible from the point of view of older versions of Samba, but which will be damaged by modifying the database with such a version. For example, if linked attributes are stored in sorted order in 4.7, and this change, without any values in current_supportedFeatures is itself included in 4.6, then our sortedLinks are backward compatible to that release. That is with 4.6 (including this patch) which doesn't care about ordering -- but a downgraded 4.7 database used by 4.6 will be broken when later used with 4.7. If we add a 'sortedLinks' feature flag in compatibleFeatures, we can detect that. This will allow us to determine if the database still contains unsorted links, as that information allows us to make the code handling links much more efficient. We won't add the actual flag until all the code is in place. Andrew wrote the actual code and Douglas wrote the tests, and they cross-reviewed. Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Piar-programmed-with: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> selftest: check for database features flags
2017-01-12 16:51:45 +13:00
ldbmodify="ldbmodify"
if [ -x "$BINDIR/ldbmodify" ]; then
s4:setup: Reformat shell scripts shfmt -f source4/setup/ | xargs shfmt -w -p -i 0 -fn Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org> Reviewed-by: Pavel Filipenský <pfilipensky@samba.org>
2022-02-23 12:03:50 +01:00
ldbmodify="$BINDIR/ldbmodify"
samba_dsdb: Use and maintain compatibleFeatures and requiredFeatures in @SAMBA_DSDB This will allow us to introduce new database features that are backward compatible from the point of view of older versions of Samba, but which will be damaged by modifying the database with such a version. For example, if linked attributes are stored in sorted order in 4.7, and this change, without any values in current_supportedFeatures is itself included in 4.6, then our sortedLinks are backward compatible to that release. That is with 4.6 (including this patch) which doesn't care about ordering -- but a downgraded 4.7 database used by 4.6 will be broken when later used with 4.7. If we add a 'sortedLinks' feature flag in compatibleFeatures, we can detect that. This will allow us to determine if the database still contains unsorted links, as that information allows us to make the code handling links much more efficient. We won't add the actual flag until all the code is in place. Andrew wrote the actual code and Douglas wrote the tests, and they cross-reviewed. Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Piar-programmed-with: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> selftest: check for database features flags
2017-01-12 16:51:45 +13:00
fi
ldbdel="ldbdel"
if [ -x "$BINDIR/ldbdel" ]; then
s4:setup: Reformat shell scripts shfmt -f source4/setup/ | xargs shfmt -w -p -i 0 -fn Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org> Reviewed-by: Pavel Filipenský <pfilipensky@samba.org>
2022-02-23 12:03:50 +01:00
ldbdel="$BINDIR/ldbdel"
samba_dsdb: Use and maintain compatibleFeatures and requiredFeatures in @SAMBA_DSDB This will allow us to introduce new database features that are backward compatible from the point of view of older versions of Samba, but which will be damaged by modifying the database with such a version. For example, if linked attributes are stored in sorted order in 4.7, and this change, without any values in current_supportedFeatures is itself included in 4.6, then our sortedLinks are backward compatible to that release. That is with 4.6 (including this patch) which doesn't care about ordering -- but a downgraded 4.7 database used by 4.6 will be broken when later used with 4.7. If we add a 'sortedLinks' feature flag in compatibleFeatures, we can detect that. This will allow us to determine if the database still contains unsorted links, as that information allows us to make the code handling links much more efficient. We won't add the actual flag until all the code is in place. Andrew wrote the actual code and Douglas wrote the tests, and they cross-reviewed. Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Piar-programmed-with: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> selftest: check for database features flags
2017-01-12 16:51:45 +13:00
fi
ldbsearch="ldbsearch"
if [ -x "$BINDIR/ldbsearch" ]; then
s4:setup: Reformat shell scripts shfmt -f source4/setup/ | xargs shfmt -w -p -i 0 -fn Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org> Reviewed-by: Pavel Filipenský <pfilipensky@samba.org>
2022-02-23 12:03:50 +01:00
ldbsearch="$BINDIR/ldbsearch"
samba_dsdb: Use and maintain compatibleFeatures and requiredFeatures in @SAMBA_DSDB This will allow us to introduce new database features that are backward compatible from the point of view of older versions of Samba, but which will be damaged by modifying the database with such a version. For example, if linked attributes are stored in sorted order in 4.7, and this change, without any values in current_supportedFeatures is itself included in 4.6, then our sortedLinks are backward compatible to that release. That is with 4.6 (including this patch) which doesn't care about ordering -- but a downgraded 4.7 database used by 4.6 will be broken when later used with 4.7. If we add a 'sortedLinks' feature flag in compatibleFeatures, we can detect that. This will allow us to determine if the database still contains unsorted links, as that information allows us to make the code handling links much more efficient. We won't add the actual flag until all the code is in place. Andrew wrote the actual code and Douglas wrote the tests, and they cross-reviewed. Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Piar-programmed-with: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> selftest: check for database features flags
2017-01-12 16:51:45 +13:00
fi
testit "provision" $PYTHON $BINDIR/samba-tool domain provision \
s4:setup: Reformat shell scripts shfmt -f source4/setup/ | xargs shfmt -w -p -i 0 -fn Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org> Reviewed-by: Pavel Filipenský <pfilipensky@samba.org>
2022-02-23 12:03:50 +01:00
--domain=FOO --realm=foo.example.com \
--targetdir=$DBPATH --use-ntvfs
samba_dsdb: Use and maintain compatibleFeatures and requiredFeatures in @SAMBA_DSDB This will allow us to introduce new database features that are backward compatible from the point of view of older versions of Samba, but which will be damaged by modifying the database with such a version. For example, if linked attributes are stored in sorted order in 4.7, and this change, without any values in current_supportedFeatures is itself included in 4.6, then our sortedLinks are backward compatible to that release. That is with 4.6 (including this patch) which doesn't care about ordering -- but a downgraded 4.7 database used by 4.6 will be broken when later used with 4.7. If we add a 'sortedLinks' feature flag in compatibleFeatures, we can detect that. This will allow us to determine if the database still contains unsorted links, as that information allows us to make the code handling links much more efficient. We won't add the actual flag until all the code is in place. Andrew wrote the actual code and Douglas wrote the tests, and they cross-reviewed. Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Piar-programmed-with: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> selftest: check for database features flags
2017-01-12 16:51:45 +13:00
testit "add-compatible-feature" $ldbmodify \
s4:setup: Reformat shell scripts shfmt -f source4/setup/ | xargs shfmt -w -p -i 0 -fn Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org> Reviewed-by: Pavel Filipenský <pfilipensky@samba.org>
2022-02-23 12:03:50 +01:00
-H tdb://$DBPATH/private/sam.ldb <<EOF
samba_dsdb: Use and maintain compatibleFeatures and requiredFeatures in @SAMBA_DSDB This will allow us to introduce new database features that are backward compatible from the point of view of older versions of Samba, but which will be damaged by modifying the database with such a version. For example, if linked attributes are stored in sorted order in 4.7, and this change, without any values in current_supportedFeatures is itself included in 4.6, then our sortedLinks are backward compatible to that release. That is with 4.6 (including this patch) which doesn't care about ordering -- but a downgraded 4.7 database used by 4.6 will be broken when later used with 4.7. If we add a 'sortedLinks' feature flag in compatibleFeatures, we can detect that. This will allow us to determine if the database still contains unsorted links, as that information allows us to make the code handling links much more efficient. We won't add the actual flag until all the code is in place. Andrew wrote the actual code and Douglas wrote the tests, and they cross-reviewed. Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Piar-programmed-with: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> selftest: check for database features flags
2017-01-12 16:51:45 +13:00
dn: @SAMBA_DSDB
changetype: modify
add: compatibleFeatures
compatibleFeatures: non-existent-feature
-
EOF
# The non-existent feature is not compatible with this version, so it
# should not be listed in compatibleFeatures even though we tried to
# put it there.
s4:setup: Reformat shell scripts shfmt -f source4/setup/ | xargs shfmt -w -p -i 0 -fn Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org> Reviewed-by: Pavel Filipenský <pfilipensky@samba.org>
2022-02-23 12:03:50 +01:00
ldb_search_fail()
{
$ldbsearch -H tdb://$DBPATH/private/sam.ldb \
-s base -b "$1" "$2" |
grep -q "$3"
samba_dsdb: Use and maintain compatibleFeatures and requiredFeatures in @SAMBA_DSDB This will allow us to introduce new database features that are backward compatible from the point of view of older versions of Samba, but which will be damaged by modifying the database with such a version. For example, if linked attributes are stored in sorted order in 4.7, and this change, without any values in current_supportedFeatures is itself included in 4.6, then our sortedLinks are backward compatible to that release. That is with 4.6 (including this patch) which doesn't care about ordering -- but a downgraded 4.7 database used by 4.6 will be broken when later used with 4.7. If we add a 'sortedLinks' feature flag in compatibleFeatures, we can detect that. This will allow us to determine if the database still contains unsorted links, as that information allows us to make the code handling links much more efficient. We won't add the actual flag until all the code is in place. Andrew wrote the actual code and Douglas wrote the tests, and they cross-reviewed. Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Piar-programmed-with: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> selftest: check for database features flags
2017-01-12 16:51:45 +13:00
}
testit_expect_failure "find-compatible-feature" \
s4:setup: Reformat shell scripts shfmt -f source4/setup/ | xargs shfmt -w -p -i 0 -fn Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org> Reviewed-by: Pavel Filipenský <pfilipensky@samba.org>
2022-02-23 12:03:50 +01:00
ldb_search_fail '@SAMBA_DSDB' 'compatibleFeatures' non-existent-feature
samba_dsdb: Use and maintain compatibleFeatures and requiredFeatures in @SAMBA_DSDB This will allow us to introduce new database features that are backward compatible from the point of view of older versions of Samba, but which will be damaged by modifying the database with such a version. For example, if linked attributes are stored in sorted order in 4.7, and this change, without any values in current_supportedFeatures is itself included in 4.6, then our sortedLinks are backward compatible to that release. That is with 4.6 (including this patch) which doesn't care about ordering -- but a downgraded 4.7 database used by 4.6 will be broken when later used with 4.7. If we add a 'sortedLinks' feature flag in compatibleFeatures, we can detect that. This will allow us to determine if the database still contains unsorted links, as that information allows us to make the code handling links much more efficient. We won't add the actual flag until all the code is in place. Andrew wrote the actual code and Douglas wrote the tests, and they cross-reviewed. Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Piar-programmed-with: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> selftest: check for database features flags
2017-01-12 16:51:45 +13:00
# just make sure the thing we're using is normally findable
testit "find-test-feature" \
s4:setup: Reformat shell scripts shfmt -f source4/setup/ | xargs shfmt -w -p -i 0 -fn Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org> Reviewed-by: Pavel Filipenský <pfilipensky@samba.org>
2022-02-23 12:03:50 +01:00
$ldbsearch -H tdb://$DBPATH/private/sam.ldb \
-b 'CN=LostAndFound,DC=foo,DC=example,DC=com'
samba_dsdb: Use and maintain compatibleFeatures and requiredFeatures in @SAMBA_DSDB This will allow us to introduce new database features that are backward compatible from the point of view of older versions of Samba, but which will be damaged by modifying the database with such a version. For example, if linked attributes are stored in sorted order in 4.7, and this change, without any values in current_supportedFeatures is itself included in 4.6, then our sortedLinks are backward compatible to that release. That is with 4.6 (including this patch) which doesn't care about ordering -- but a downgraded 4.7 database used by 4.6 will be broken when later used with 4.7. If we add a 'sortedLinks' feature flag in compatibleFeatures, we can detect that. This will allow us to determine if the database still contains unsorted links, as that information allows us to make the code handling links much more efficient. We won't add the actual flag until all the code is in place. Andrew wrote the actual code and Douglas wrote the tests, and they cross-reviewed. Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Piar-programmed-with: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> selftest: check for database features flags
2017-01-12 16:51:45 +13:00
testit "add-required-feature" $ldbmodify \
s4:setup: Reformat shell scripts shfmt -f source4/setup/ | xargs shfmt -w -p -i 0 -fn Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org> Reviewed-by: Pavel Filipenský <pfilipensky@samba.org>
2022-02-23 12:03:50 +01:00
-H tdb://$DBPATH/private/sam.ldb <<EOF
samba_dsdb: Use and maintain compatibleFeatures and requiredFeatures in @SAMBA_DSDB This will allow us to introduce new database features that are backward compatible from the point of view of older versions of Samba, but which will be damaged by modifying the database with such a version. For example, if linked attributes are stored in sorted order in 4.7, and this change, without any values in current_supportedFeatures is itself included in 4.6, then our sortedLinks are backward compatible to that release. That is with 4.6 (including this patch) which doesn't care about ordering -- but a downgraded 4.7 database used by 4.6 will be broken when later used with 4.7. If we add a 'sortedLinks' feature flag in compatibleFeatures, we can detect that. This will allow us to determine if the database still contains unsorted links, as that information allows us to make the code handling links much more efficient. We won't add the actual flag until all the code is in place. Andrew wrote the actual code and Douglas wrote the tests, and they cross-reviewed. Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Piar-programmed-with: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> selftest: check for database features flags
2017-01-12 16:51:45 +13:00
dn: @SAMBA_DSDB
changetype: modify
add: requiredFeatures
requiredFeatures: futuristic-feature
-
EOF
# The futuristic-feature is not implemented in this version, but it is
# required by this database. A search for anything should fail.
testit_expect_failure "find-required-feature" \
s4:setup: Reformat shell scripts shfmt -f source4/setup/ | xargs shfmt -w -p -i 0 -fn Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org> Reviewed-by: Pavel Filipenský <pfilipensky@samba.org>
2022-02-23 12:03:50 +01:00
$ldbsearch -H tdb://$DBPATH/private/sam.ldb \
-b 'CN=LostAndFound,DC=foo,DC=example,DC=com'
samba_dsdb: Use and maintain compatibleFeatures and requiredFeatures in @SAMBA_DSDB This will allow us to introduce new database features that are backward compatible from the point of view of older versions of Samba, but which will be damaged by modifying the database with such a version. For example, if linked attributes are stored in sorted order in 4.7, and this change, without any values in current_supportedFeatures is itself included in 4.6, then our sortedLinks are backward compatible to that release. That is with 4.6 (including this patch) which doesn't care about ordering -- but a downgraded 4.7 database used by 4.6 will be broken when later used with 4.7. If we add a 'sortedLinks' feature flag in compatibleFeatures, we can detect that. This will allow us to determine if the database still contains unsorted links, as that information allows us to make the code handling links much more efficient. We won't add the actual flag until all the code is in place. Andrew wrote the actual code and Douglas wrote the tests, and they cross-reviewed. Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Piar-programmed-with: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz> Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> selftest: check for database features flags
2017-01-12 16:51:45 +13:00
rm -rf $DBPATH
exit $failed
Copy Permalink