mirror of
https://github.com/samba-team/samba.git
synced 2024-12-25 23:21:54 +03:00
340 lines
11 KiB
Plaintext
340 lines
11 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Network Working Group K. Zeilenga
|
|||
|
Request for Comments: 4525 OpenLDAP Foundation
|
|||
|
Category: Informational June 2006
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP)
|
|||
|
Modify-Increment Extension
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Status of This Memo
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does
|
|||
|
not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this
|
|||
|
memo is unlimited.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Copyright Notice
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Abstract
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
This document describes an extension to the Lightweight Directory
|
|||
|
Access Protocol (LDAP) Modify operation to support an increment
|
|||
|
capability. This extension is useful in provisioning applications,
|
|||
|
especially when combined with the assertion control and/or the pre-
|
|||
|
read or post-read control extension.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Table of Contents
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
1. Background and Intended Use .....................................1
|
|||
|
2. The Modify-Increment Extension ..................................2
|
|||
|
3. LDIF Support ....................................................2
|
|||
|
4. Security Considerations .........................................3
|
|||
|
5. IANA Considerations .............................................3
|
|||
|
5.1. Object Identifier ..........................................3
|
|||
|
5.2. LDAP Protocol Mechanism ....................................3
|
|||
|
5.3. LDAP Protocol Mechanism ....................................4
|
|||
|
6. References ......................................................4
|
|||
|
6.1. Normative References .......................................4
|
|||
|
6.2. Informative References .....................................5
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
1. Background and Intended Use
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) [RFC4510] does not
|
|||
|
currently provide an operation to increment values of an attribute.
|
|||
|
A client must read the values of the attribute and then modify those
|
|||
|
values to increment them by the desired amount. As the values may be
|
|||
|
updated by other clients between this add and modify, the client must
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Zeilenga Informational [Page 1]
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
RFC 4525 LDAP Modify-Increment Extension June 2006
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
be careful to construct the modify request so that it fails in this
|
|||
|
case, and upon failure, to re-read the values and construct a new
|
|||
|
modify request.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
This document extends the LDAP Modify Operation [RFC4511] to support
|
|||
|
an increment values capability. This feature is intended to be used
|
|||
|
with either the LDAP pre-read or post-read control extensions
|
|||
|
[RFC4527]. This feature may also be used with the LDAP assertion
|
|||
|
control extension [RFC4528] to provide test-and-increment
|
|||
|
functionality.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In this document key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL",
|
|||
|
"SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
|
|||
|
"OPTIONAL" are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119].
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
2. The Modify-Increment Extension
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
This document extends the LDAP Modify request to support a increment
|
|||
|
values capability. Implementations of this extension SHALL support
|
|||
|
an additional ModifyRequest operation enumeration value increment
|
|||
|
(3), as described herein. Implementations not supporting this
|
|||
|
extension will treat this value as they would an unlisted value,
|
|||
|
e.g., as a protocol error.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The increment (3) operation value specifies that an increment values
|
|||
|
modification is requested. All existing values of the modification
|
|||
|
attribute are to be incremented by the listed value. The
|
|||
|
modification attribute must be appropriate for the request (e.g., it
|
|||
|
must have INTEGER or other increment-able values), and the
|
|||
|
modification must provide one and only one value. If the attribute
|
|||
|
is not appropriate for the request, a constraintViolation or other
|
|||
|
appropriate error is to be returned. If multiple values are
|
|||
|
provided, a protocolError is to be returned.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Servers supporting this feature SHOULD publish the object identifier
|
|||
|
(OID) 1.3.6.1.1.14 as a value of the 'supportedFeatures' [RFC4512]
|
|||
|
attribute in the root DSE. Clients supporting this feature SHOULD
|
|||
|
NOT use the feature unless they know the server supports it.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
3. LDIF Support
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
To represent Modify-Increment requests in LDAP Data Interchange
|
|||
|
Format [RFC2849], the ABNF [RFC4234] production <mod-spec> is
|
|||
|
extended as follows:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
mod-spec =/ "increment:" FILL AttributeDescription SEP
|
|||
|
attrval-spec "-" SEP
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Zeilenga Informational [Page 2]
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
RFC 4525 LDAP Modify-Increment Extension June 2006
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
For example,
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
# Increment uidNumber
|
|||
|
dn: cn=max-assigned uidNumber,dc=example,dc=com
|
|||
|
changetype: modify
|
|||
|
increment: uidNumber
|
|||
|
uidNumber: 1
|
|||
|
-
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
This LDIF fragment represents a Modify request to increment the
|
|||
|
value(s) of uidNumber by 1.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
4. Security Considerations
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
General LDAP security considerations [RFC4510], as well as those
|
|||
|
specific to the LDAP Modify [RFC4511], apply to this Modify-Increment
|
|||
|
extension. Beyond these considerations, it is noted that
|
|||
|
introduction of this extension should reduce application complexity
|
|||
|
(by providing one operation for what presently requires multiple
|
|||
|
operations) and, hence, it may aid in the production of correct and
|
|||
|
secure implementations.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
5. IANA Considerations
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Registration of the following values [RFC4520] have been completed.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
5.1. Object Identifier
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The IANA has assigned an LDAP Object Identifier to identify the LDAP
|
|||
|
Modify-Increment feature, as defined in this document.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Subject: Request for LDAP Object Identifier Registration
|
|||
|
Person & email address to contact for further information:
|
|||
|
Kurt Zeilenga <kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
|
|||
|
Specification: RFC 4525
|
|||
|
Author/Change Controller: Author
|
|||
|
Comments:
|
|||
|
Identifies the LDAP Modify-Increment feature
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
5.2. LDAP Protocol Mechanism
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The following LDAP Protocol Mechanism has been registered.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Subject: Request for LDAP Protocol Mechanism Registration
|
|||
|
Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.1.14
|
|||
|
Description: Modify-Increment
|
|||
|
Person & email address to contact for further information:
|
|||
|
Kurt Zeilenga <kurt@openldap.org>
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Zeilenga Informational [Page 3]
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
RFC 4525 LDAP Modify-Increment Extension June 2006
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Usage: Feature
|
|||
|
Specification: RFC 4525
|
|||
|
Author/Change Controller: Kurt Zeilenga <kurt@openldap.org>
|
|||
|
Comments: none
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
5.3. LDAP Protocol Mechanism
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The IANA has assigned an LDAP ModifyRequest Operation Type (3)
|
|||
|
[RFC4520] for use in this document.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Subject: Request for LDAP Protocol Mechanism Registration
|
|||
|
ModifyRequest Operation Name: increment
|
|||
|
Description: Modify-Increment
|
|||
|
Person & email address to contact for further information:
|
|||
|
Kurt Zeilenga <kurt@openldap.org>
|
|||
|
Usage: Feature
|
|||
|
Specification: RFC 4525
|
|||
|
Author/Change Controller: Kurt Zeilenga <kurt@openldap.org>
|
|||
|
Comments: none
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
6. References
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
6.1. Normative References
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
|
|||
|
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
[RFC4234] Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
|
|||
|
Specifications: ABNF", RFC 4234, October 2005.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
[RFC2849] Good, G., "The LDAP Data Interchange Format (LDIF) -
|
|||
|
Technical Specification", RFC 2849, June 2000.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
[RFC4510] Zeilenga, K., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access
|
|||
|
Protocol (LDAP): Technical Specification Road Map", RFC
|
|||
|
4510, June 2006.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
[RFC4511] Sermersheim, J., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access
|
|||
|
Protocol (LDAP): The Protocol", RFC 4511, June 2006.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
[RFC4512] Zeilenga, K., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
|
|||
|
(LDAP): Directory Information Models", RFC 4512, June
|
|||
|
2006.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Zeilenga Informational [Page 4]
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
RFC 4525 LDAP Modify-Increment Extension June 2006
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
6.2. Informative References
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
[RFC4520] Zeilenga, K., "Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
|
|||
|
(IANA) Considerations for the Lightweight Directory
|
|||
|
Access Protocol (LDAP)", BCP 64, RFC 4520, June 2006.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
[RFC4527] Zeilenga, K., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
|
|||
|
(LDAP) Read Entry Controls", RFC 4527, June 2006.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
[RFC4528] Zeilenga, K., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
|
|||
|
(LDAP) Assertion Control", RFC 4528, June 2006.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Author's Address
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Kurt D. Zeilenga
|
|||
|
OpenLDAP Foundation
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
EMail: Kurt@OpenLDAP.org
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Zeilenga Informational [Page 5]
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
RFC 4525 LDAP Modify-Increment Extension June 2006
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Full Copyright Statement
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
|
|||
|
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
|
|||
|
retain all their rights.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
|
|||
|
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
|
|||
|
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
|
|||
|
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
|
|||
|
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
|
|||
|
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
|
|||
|
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Intellectual Property
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
|
|||
|
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
|
|||
|
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
|
|||
|
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
|
|||
|
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
|
|||
|
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
|
|||
|
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
|
|||
|
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
|
|||
|
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
|
|||
|
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
|
|||
|
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
|
|||
|
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
|
|||
|
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
|
|||
|
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
|
|||
|
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
|
|||
|
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
|
|||
|
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Acknowledgement
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF
|
|||
|
Administrative Support Activity (IASA).
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Zeilenga Informational [Page 6]
|
|||
|
|