r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
/*
Unix SMB / CIFS implementation .
Database interface wrapper around tdb
Copyright ( C ) Volker Lendecke 2005 - 2007
This program is free software ; you can redistribute it and / or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
2007-07-09 23:25:36 +04:00
the Free Software Foundation ; either version 3 of the License , or
r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
( at your option ) any later version .
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful ,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY ; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE . See the
GNU General Public License for more details .
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
2007-07-10 04:52:41 +04:00
along with this program . If not , see < http : //www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
*/
# ifndef __FILEDB_H__
# define __FILEDB_H__
struct db_record {
TDB_DATA key , value ;
NTSTATUS ( * store ) ( struct db_record * rec , TDB_DATA data , int flag ) ;
NTSTATUS ( * delete_rec ) ( struct db_record * rec ) ;
void * private_data ;
} ;
struct db_context {
struct db_record * ( * fetch_locked ) ( struct db_context * db ,
TALLOC_CTX * mem_ctx ,
TDB_DATA key ) ;
int ( * fetch ) ( struct db_context * db , TALLOC_CTX * mem_ctx ,
TDB_DATA key , TDB_DATA * data ) ;
int ( * traverse ) ( struct db_context * db ,
int ( * f ) ( struct db_record * db ,
void * private_data ) ,
void * private_data ) ;
2007-05-29 22:04:38 +04:00
int ( * traverse_read ) ( struct db_context * db ,
int ( * f ) ( struct db_record * db ,
void * private_data ) ,
void * private_data ) ;
r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
int ( * get_seqnum ) ( struct db_context * db ) ;
void * private_data ;
} ;
struct db_context * db_open ( TALLOC_CTX * mem_ctx ,
const char * name ,
int hash_size , int tdb_flags ,
int open_flags , mode_t mode ) ;
# endif /* __FILEDB_H__ */
