r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
/*
Unix SMB / CIFS implementation .
Database interface wrapper around tdb
Copyright ( C ) Volker Lendecke 2005 - 2007
This program is free software ; you can redistribute it and / or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
2007-07-09 23:25:36 +04:00
the Free Software Foundation ; either version 3 of the License , or
r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
( at your option ) any later version .
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful ,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY ; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE . See the
GNU General Public License for more details .
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
2007-07-10 04:52:41 +04:00
along with this program . If not , see < http : //www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
*/
# include "includes.h"
2010-08-18 20:59:23 +04:00
# include "dbwrap.h"
r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
struct db_tdb_ctx {
2007-06-03 10:54:51 +04:00
struct tdb_wrap * wtdb ;
r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
} ;
static NTSTATUS db_tdb_store ( struct db_record * rec , TDB_DATA data , int flag ) ;
static NTSTATUS db_tdb_delete ( struct db_record * rec ) ;
static int db_tdb_record_destr ( struct db_record * data )
{
struct db_tdb_ctx * ctx =
talloc_get_type_abort ( data - > private_data , struct db_tdb_ctx ) ;
2008-10-18 18:16:57 +04:00
/* This hex_encode_talloc() call allocates memory on data context. By way how current
2008-01-16 12:09:48 +03:00
__talloc_free ( ) code works , it is OK to allocate in the destructor as
the children of data will be freed after call to the destructor and this
new ' child ' will be caught and freed correctly .
*/
2007-08-29 15:46:44 +04:00
DEBUG ( 10 , ( DEBUGLEVEL > 10
2007-11-07 21:06:30 +03:00
? " Unlocking key %s \n " : " Unlocking key %.20s \n " ,
2008-10-18 18:16:57 +04:00
hex_encode_talloc ( data , ( unsigned char * ) data - > key . dptr ,
r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
data - > key . dsize ) ) ) ;
2007-06-03 10:54:51 +04:00
if ( tdb_chainunlock ( ctx - > wtdb - > tdb , data - > key ) ! = 0 ) {
r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
DEBUG ( 0 , ( " tdb_chainunlock failed \n " ) ) ;
return - 1 ;
}
return 0 ;
}
2008-01-07 02:14:24 +03:00
struct tdb_fetch_locked_state {
TALLOC_CTX * mem_ctx ;
r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
struct db_record * result ;
2008-01-07 02:14:24 +03:00
} ;
r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
2008-01-07 02:14:24 +03:00
static int db_tdb_fetchlock_parse ( TDB_DATA key , TDB_DATA data ,
void * private_data )
{
struct tdb_fetch_locked_state * state =
( struct tdb_fetch_locked_state * ) private_data ;
state - > result = ( struct db_record * ) talloc_size (
state - > mem_ctx ,
sizeof ( struct db_record ) + key . dsize + data . dsize ) ;
if ( state - > result = = NULL ) {
return 0 ;
r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
}
2008-01-07 02:14:24 +03:00
state - > result - > key . dsize = key . dsize ;
state - > result - > key . dptr = ( ( uint8 * ) state - > result )
+ sizeof ( struct db_record ) ;
memcpy ( state - > result - > key . dptr , key . dptr , key . dsize ) ;
state - > result - > value . dsize = data . dsize ;
if ( data . dsize > 0 ) {
2008-01-07 02:41:26 +03:00
state - > result - > value . dptr = state - > result - > key . dptr + key . dsize ;
2008-01-07 02:14:24 +03:00
memcpy ( state - > result - > value . dptr , data . dptr , data . dsize ) ;
}
else {
state - > result - > value . dptr = NULL ;
r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
}
2008-01-07 02:14:24 +03:00
return 0 ;
}
static struct db_record * db_tdb_fetch_locked ( struct db_context * db ,
TALLOC_CTX * mem_ctx , TDB_DATA key )
{
struct db_tdb_ctx * ctx = talloc_get_type_abort ( db - > private_data ,
struct db_tdb_ctx ) ;
struct tdb_fetch_locked_state state ;
r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
2008-01-16 12:09:48 +03:00
/* Do not accidently allocate/deallocate w/o need when debug level is lower than needed */
if ( DEBUGLEVEL > = 10 ) {
2009-07-17 05:13:46 +04:00
char * keystr = hex_encode_talloc ( talloc_tos ( ) , ( unsigned char * ) key . dptr , key . dsize ) ;
2007-08-29 15:46:44 +04:00
DEBUG ( 10 , ( DEBUGLEVEL > 10
2007-11-07 21:06:30 +03:00
? " Locking key %s \n " : " Locking key %.20s \n " ,
2007-08-29 15:46:44 +04:00
keystr ) ) ;
r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
TALLOC_FREE ( keystr ) ;
}
2007-06-03 10:54:51 +04:00
if ( tdb_chainlock ( ctx - > wtdb - > tdb , key ) ! = 0 ) {
r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
DEBUG ( 3 , ( " tdb_chainlock failed \n " ) ) ;
return NULL ;
}
2008-01-07 02:14:24 +03:00
state . mem_ctx = mem_ctx ;
state . result = NULL ;
r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
2008-01-20 19:35:25 +03:00
tdb_parse_record ( ctx - > wtdb - > tdb , key , db_tdb_fetchlock_parse , & state ) ;
r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
2008-01-07 02:14:24 +03:00
if ( state . result = = NULL ) {
db_tdb_fetchlock_parse ( key , tdb_null , & state ) ;
r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
}
2008-01-07 02:14:24 +03:00
if ( state . result = = NULL ) {
tdb_chainunlock ( ctx - > wtdb - > tdb , key ) ;
r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
return NULL ;
}
2008-01-07 02:14:24 +03:00
talloc_set_destructor ( state . result , db_tdb_record_destr ) ;
state . result - > private_data = talloc_reference ( state . result , ctx ) ;
state . result - > store = db_tdb_store ;
state . result - > delete_rec = db_tdb_delete ;
r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
2008-01-07 02:14:24 +03:00
DEBUG ( 10 , ( " Allocated locked data 0x%p \n " , state . result ) ) ;
r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
2008-01-07 02:14:24 +03:00
return state . result ;
r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
}
2008-01-07 02:41:26 +03:00
struct tdb_fetch_state {
TALLOC_CTX * mem_ctx ;
int result ;
TDB_DATA data ;
} ;
static int db_tdb_fetch_parse ( TDB_DATA key , TDB_DATA data ,
void * private_data )
{
struct tdb_fetch_state * state =
( struct tdb_fetch_state * ) private_data ;
state - > data . dptr = ( uint8 * ) talloc_memdup ( state - > mem_ctx , data . dptr ,
data . dsize ) ;
if ( state - > data . dptr = = NULL ) {
state - > result = - 1 ;
return 0 ;
}
state - > data . dsize = data . dsize ;
return 0 ;
}
2007-11-24 22:21:19 +03:00
static int db_tdb_fetch ( struct db_context * db , TALLOC_CTX * mem_ctx ,
TDB_DATA key , TDB_DATA * pdata )
{
struct db_tdb_ctx * ctx = talloc_get_type_abort (
db - > private_data , struct db_tdb_ctx ) ;
2008-01-07 02:41:26 +03:00
struct tdb_fetch_state state ;
2007-11-24 22:21:19 +03:00
2008-01-07 02:41:26 +03:00
state . mem_ctx = mem_ctx ;
state . result = 0 ;
2008-01-10 15:22:51 +03:00
state . data = tdb_null ;
2007-11-24 22:21:19 +03:00
2008-01-07 02:41:26 +03:00
tdb_parse_record ( ctx - > wtdb - > tdb , key , db_tdb_fetch_parse , & state ) ;
2007-11-24 22:21:19 +03:00
2008-01-07 02:41:26 +03:00
if ( state . result = = - 1 ) {
2007-11-24 22:21:19 +03:00
return - 1 ;
}
2008-01-07 02:41:26 +03:00
* pdata = state . data ;
2007-11-24 22:21:19 +03:00
return 0 ;
}
2009-02-22 02:47:54 +03:00
static int db_tdb_parse ( struct db_context * db , TDB_DATA key ,
int ( * parser ) ( TDB_DATA key , TDB_DATA data ,
void * private_data ) ,
void * private_data )
{
struct db_tdb_ctx * ctx = talloc_get_type_abort (
db - > private_data , struct db_tdb_ctx ) ;
return tdb_parse_record ( ctx - > wtdb - > tdb , key , parser , private_data ) ;
}
r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
static NTSTATUS db_tdb_store ( struct db_record * rec , TDB_DATA data , int flag )
{
struct db_tdb_ctx * ctx = talloc_get_type_abort ( rec - > private_data ,
struct db_tdb_ctx ) ;
/*
* This has a bug : We need to replace rec - > value for correct
* operation , but right now brlock and locking don ' t use the value
* anymore after it was stored .
*/
2007-06-03 10:54:51 +04:00
return ( tdb_store ( ctx - > wtdb - > tdb , rec - > key , data , flag ) = = 0 ) ?
r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
NT_STATUS_OK : NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL ;
}
static NTSTATUS db_tdb_delete ( struct db_record * rec )
{
struct db_tdb_ctx * ctx = talloc_get_type_abort ( rec - > private_data ,
struct db_tdb_ctx ) ;
2008-01-24 21:06:25 +03:00
if ( tdb_delete ( ctx - > wtdb - > tdb , rec - > key ) = = 0 ) {
return NT_STATUS_OK ;
}
if ( tdb_error ( ctx - > wtdb - > tdb ) = = TDB_ERR_NOEXIST ) {
return NT_STATUS_NOT_FOUND ;
}
return NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL ;
r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
}
struct db_tdb_traverse_ctx {
struct db_context * db ;
int ( * f ) ( struct db_record * rec , void * private_data ) ;
void * private_data ;
} ;
static int db_tdb_traverse_func ( TDB_CONTEXT * tdb , TDB_DATA kbuf , TDB_DATA dbuf ,
void * private_data )
{
struct db_tdb_traverse_ctx * ctx =
( struct db_tdb_traverse_ctx * ) private_data ;
struct db_record rec ;
rec . key = kbuf ;
rec . value = dbuf ;
rec . store = db_tdb_store ;
rec . delete_rec = db_tdb_delete ;
rec . private_data = ctx - > db - > private_data ;
return ctx - > f ( & rec , ctx - > private_data ) ;
}
static int db_tdb_traverse ( struct db_context * db ,
int ( * f ) ( struct db_record * rec , void * private_data ) ,
void * private_data )
{
struct db_tdb_ctx * db_ctx =
talloc_get_type_abort ( db - > private_data , struct db_tdb_ctx ) ;
struct db_tdb_traverse_ctx ctx ;
ctx . db = db ;
ctx . f = f ;
ctx . private_data = private_data ;
2007-06-03 10:54:51 +04:00
return tdb_traverse ( db_ctx - > wtdb - > tdb , db_tdb_traverse_func , & ctx ) ;
r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
}
2007-05-29 22:04:38 +04:00
static NTSTATUS db_tdb_store_deny ( struct db_record * rec , TDB_DATA data , int flag )
{
return NT_STATUS_MEDIA_WRITE_PROTECTED ;
}
static NTSTATUS db_tdb_delete_deny ( struct db_record * rec )
{
return NT_STATUS_MEDIA_WRITE_PROTECTED ;
}
static int db_tdb_traverse_read_func ( TDB_CONTEXT * tdb , TDB_DATA kbuf , TDB_DATA dbuf ,
void * private_data )
{
struct db_tdb_traverse_ctx * ctx =
( struct db_tdb_traverse_ctx * ) private_data ;
struct db_record rec ;
rec . key = kbuf ;
rec . value = dbuf ;
rec . store = db_tdb_store_deny ;
rec . delete_rec = db_tdb_delete_deny ;
rec . private_data = ctx - > db - > private_data ;
return ctx - > f ( & rec , ctx - > private_data ) ;
}
static int db_tdb_traverse_read ( struct db_context * db ,
int ( * f ) ( struct db_record * rec , void * private_data ) ,
void * private_data )
{
struct db_tdb_ctx * db_ctx =
talloc_get_type_abort ( db - > private_data , struct db_tdb_ctx ) ;
struct db_tdb_traverse_ctx ctx ;
ctx . db = db ;
ctx . f = f ;
ctx . private_data = private_data ;
2007-06-03 10:54:51 +04:00
return tdb_traverse_read ( db_ctx - > wtdb - > tdb , db_tdb_traverse_read_func , & ctx ) ;
2007-05-29 22:04:38 +04:00
}
r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
static int db_tdb_get_seqnum ( struct db_context * db )
{
struct db_tdb_ctx * db_ctx =
talloc_get_type_abort ( db - > private_data , struct db_tdb_ctx ) ;
2007-06-03 10:54:51 +04:00
return tdb_get_seqnum ( db_ctx - > wtdb - > tdb ) ;
r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
}
2008-12-17 10:35:35 +03:00
static int db_tdb_get_flags ( struct db_context * db )
{
struct db_tdb_ctx * db_ctx =
talloc_get_type_abort ( db - > private_data , struct db_tdb_ctx ) ;
return tdb_get_flags ( db_ctx - > wtdb - > tdb ) ;
}
2008-03-10 12:17:05 +03:00
static int db_tdb_transaction_start ( struct db_context * db )
{
struct db_tdb_ctx * db_ctx =
talloc_get_type_abort ( db - > private_data , struct db_tdb_ctx ) ;
return tdb_transaction_start ( db_ctx - > wtdb - > tdb ) ;
}
static int db_tdb_transaction_commit ( struct db_context * db )
{
struct db_tdb_ctx * db_ctx =
talloc_get_type_abort ( db - > private_data , struct db_tdb_ctx ) ;
return tdb_transaction_commit ( db_ctx - > wtdb - > tdb ) ;
}
static int db_tdb_transaction_cancel ( struct db_context * db )
{
struct db_tdb_ctx * db_ctx =
talloc_get_type_abort ( db - > private_data , struct db_tdb_ctx ) ;
return tdb_transaction_cancel ( db_ctx - > wtdb - > tdb ) ;
}
r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
struct db_context * db_open_tdb ( TALLOC_CTX * mem_ctx ,
const char * name ,
int hash_size , int tdb_flags ,
int open_flags , mode_t mode )
{
struct db_context * result = NULL ;
struct db_tdb_ctx * db_tdb ;
result = TALLOC_ZERO_P ( mem_ctx , struct db_context ) ;
if ( result = = NULL ) {
DEBUG ( 0 , ( " talloc failed \n " ) ) ;
goto fail ;
}
result - > private_data = db_tdb = TALLOC_P ( result , struct db_tdb_ctx ) ;
if ( db_tdb = = NULL ) {
DEBUG ( 0 , ( " talloc failed \n " ) ) ;
goto fail ;
}
2007-06-03 10:54:51 +04:00
db_tdb - > wtdb = tdb_wrap_open ( db_tdb , name , hash_size , tdb_flags ,
open_flags , mode ) ;
if ( db_tdb - > wtdb = = NULL ) {
r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
DEBUG ( 3 , ( " Could not open tdb: %s \n " , strerror ( errno ) ) ) ;
goto fail ;
}
result - > fetch_locked = db_tdb_fetch_locked ;
2007-11-24 22:21:19 +03:00
result - > fetch = db_tdb_fetch ;
r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
result - > traverse = db_tdb_traverse ;
2007-05-29 22:04:38 +04:00
result - > traverse_read = db_tdb_traverse_read ;
2009-02-22 02:47:54 +03:00
result - > parse_record = db_tdb_parse ;
r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
result - > get_seqnum = db_tdb_get_seqnum ;
2008-12-17 10:35:35 +03:00
result - > get_flags = db_tdb_get_flags ;
2008-01-16 12:09:48 +03:00
result - > persistent = ( ( tdb_flags & TDB_CLEAR_IF_FIRST ) = = 0 ) ;
2008-03-10 12:17:05 +03:00
result - > transaction_start = db_tdb_transaction_start ;
result - > transaction_commit = db_tdb_transaction_commit ;
result - > transaction_cancel = db_tdb_transaction_cancel ;
r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
2007-05-10 14:42:13 +04:00
return result ;
fail :
if ( result ! = NULL ) {
TALLOC_FREE ( result ) ;
}
return NULL ;
}