From 03cfcabec4282ba23d29aa25b5cc766c98abb35a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gerald Carter <jerry@samba.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 13:44:46 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] r11301: why would you look for printf in -lnsl[_s]?  Fixing
 configure checks (This used to be commit
 c495059de1675676fe4d9a87ce516a54f16e9c66)

---
 source3/configure.in | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/source3/configure.in b/source3/configure.in
index 1de82464b4a..eb1974ccf7a 100644
--- a/source3/configure.in
+++ b/source3/configure.in
@@ -1102,11 +1102,11 @@ AC_CHECK_FUNCS(connect)
 if test x"$ac_cv_func_connect" = x"no"; then
     case "$LIBS" in
     *-lnsl*) ;;
-    *) AC_CHECK_LIB(nsl_s, printf) ;;
+    *) AC_CHECK_LIB(nsl_s, connect) ;;
     esac
     case "$LIBS" in
     *-lnsl*) ;;
-    *) AC_CHECK_LIB(nsl, printf) ;;
+    *) AC_CHECK_LIB(nsl, connect) ;;
     esac
     case "$LIBS" in
     *-lsocket*) ;;