1
0
mirror of https://github.com/samba-team/samba.git synced 2025-02-26 21:57:41 +03:00

build: improve stack protector check

Testing a toolchain for proper -fstack-protector must go beyond ensuring
the compiler and linker accept the option.
If the test C program does nothing with the stack then guards aren't
inserted and/or are optimized away giving the false impression that it
works when in fact the libc might not support it.

Update the check to a program that uses the stack, hence making a link
fail if proper support isn't available, for example in non-ssp enabled
uclibc toolchains like this:

test.c:(.text.startup+0x64): undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'

Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Böhme <rb@sernet.de>

Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Sep 21 23:29:13 CEST 2015 on sn-devel-104
This commit is contained in:
Gustavo Zacarias 2015-09-11 16:57:16 -03:00 committed by Jeremy Allison
parent b4747b6364
commit 1399198d51

View File

@ -657,9 +657,23 @@ def SAMBA_CONFIG_H(conf, path=None):
if not IN_LAUNCH_DIR(conf):
return
if conf.CHECK_CFLAGS(['-fstack-protector']) and conf.CHECK_LDFLAGS(['-fstack-protector']):
conf.ADD_CFLAGS('-fstack-protector')
conf.ADD_LDFLAGS('-fstack-protector')
# we need to build real code that can't be optimized away to test
if conf.check(fragment='''
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void)
{
char t[100000];
while (fgets(t, sizeof(t), stdin));
return 0;
}
''',
execute=0,
ccflags='-fstack-protector',
ldflags='-fstack-protector',
msg='Checking if toolchain accepts -fstack-protector'):
conf.ADD_CFLAGS('-fstack-protector')
conf.ADD_LDFLAGS('-fstack-protector')
if Options.options.debug:
conf.ADD_CFLAGS('-g', testflags=True)