sin/samba-mirror
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/samba-team/samba.git synced 2025-03-12 20:58:37 +03:00
Code

Next update of VFS modules development guide

Browse Source 
(This used to be commit d2c86fef8ce46e6ff265d472af3de671962c1a58)
This commit is contained in:
Alexander Bokovoy 2008-04-15 14:53:18 +00:00 committed by Gerald W. Carter
parent 26dfb095bc
commit 1972382463
1 changed files with 121 additions and 22 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

143
docs/Samba3-Developers-Guide/vfs.xml
View File

@ -22,39 +22,138 @@
<sect1> <sect1>
<title>The Samba (Posix) VFS layer</title> <title>The Samba (Posix) VFS layer</title>
<para>While most of Samba deployments are done using POSIX-compatible operating systems, <para>While most of Samba deployments are done using POSIX-compatible
there is clearly more to a file system than what is required by POSIX when it comes to operating systems, there is clearly more to a file system than what is
adopting semantics of NT file system. Since Samba 2.2 all file-system related operations required by POSIX when it comes to adopting semantics of NT file
go through an abstraction layer for virtual file system (VFS) that is modelled after system. Since Samba 2.2 all file-system related operations go through
both POSIX and additional functions needed to transform NTFS semantics. an abstraction layer for virtual file system (VFS) that is modelled
after both POSIX and additional functions needed to transform NTFS
semantics.
</para> </para>
<para> <para>
This abstraction layer now provides more features than a regular POSIX file system could This abstraction layer now provides more features than a regular POSIX
fill in. It is not required that all of them should be implemented by your file system could fill in. It is not required that all of them should
particular file system. However, when those features are available, Samba would advertize them to a be implemented by your particular file system. However, when those
CIFS client and they might be used by an application and in case of Windows client that features are available, Samba would advertize them to a CIFS client
might mean a client expects even more additional functionality when it encounters and they might be used by an application and in case of Windows client
those features. There is a practical reason to allow handling of this snowfall without modifying that might mean a client expects even more additional functionality
the Samba core and it is fulfilled by providing an infrastructure to dynamically load when it encounters those features. There is a practical reason to
VFS modules at run time. allow handling of this snowfall without modifying the Samba core and
it is fulfilled by providing an infrastructure to dynamically load VFS
modules at run time.
</para> </para>
<para>Each VFS module could implement a number of VFS operations. The way it does it is <para>Each VFS module could implement a number of VFS operations. The
irrelevant, only two things actually matter: whether specific implementation wants to cooperate way it does it is irrelevant, only two things actually matter: whether
with other modules' implementations or not, and whether module needs to store additional specific implementation wants to cooperate with other modules'
information that is specific to a context it is operating in. Multiple VFS modules could implementations or not, and whether module needs to store additional
be loaded at the same time and it is even possible to load several instances of the same information that is specific to a context it is operating in. Multiple
VFS module with different parameters. VFS modules could be loaded at the same time and it is even possible
to load several instances of the same VFS module with different
parameters.
</para> </para>
<sect2> <sect2>
<title>The general interface</title> <title>The general interface</title>
<para>A VFS module has three major components:
<itemizedlist>
<listitem><emphasis>An initialization function</emphasis> that is
called during the module load to register implemented
operations.</listitem>
<listitem><emphasis>An operations table</emphasis> representing a
mapping between statically defined module functions and VFS layer
operations.</listitem>
<listitem><emphasis>Module functions</emphasis> that do actual
work.</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</para>
<para>While this structure has been first applied to the VFS
subsystem, it is now commonly used across all Samba 3 subsystems that
support loadable modules. In fact, one module could provide a number
of interfaces to different subsystems by exposing different
<emphasis>operation tables</emphasis> through separate
<emphasis>initialization functions</emphasis>.</para>
<para><emphasis>An initialization function</emphasis> is used to
register module with Samba run-time. As Samba internal structures and
API are changed over lifetime, each released version has a VFS
interface version that is increased as VFS development progresses or
any of underlying Samba structures are changed in binary-incompatible
way. When VFS module is compiled in, VFS interface version of that
Samba environment is embedded into the module's binary object and is
checked by the Samba core upon module load. If VFS interface number
reported by the module isn't the same Samba core knows about, version
conflict is detected and module dropped to avoid any potential memory
corruption when accessing (changed) Samba structures.
</para>
<para>Therefore, initialization function passes three parameters to the
VFS registration function, <literal>smb_register_vfs()</literal>
<itemizedlist>
<listitem><emphasis>interface version number</emphasis>, as constant
<literal>SMB_VFS_INTERFACE_VERSION</literal>, </listitem>
<listitem><emphasis>module name</emphasis>, under which Samba core
will know it, and</listitem>
<listitem><emphasis>an operations' table</emphasis>.</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</para>
<para>The <emphasis>operations' table</emphasis> defines which
functions in the module would correspond to specific VFS operations
and how those functions would co-operate with the rest of VFS
subsystem. Each operation could perform in a following ways:
<itemizedlist>
<listitem><emphasis>transparent</emphasis>, meaning that while
operation is overriden, the module will still call a previous
implementation, before or after its own action. This mode is
indicated by the constant
<literal>SMB_VFS_LAYER_TRANSPARENT</literal>;
</listitem>
<listitem><emphasis>opaque</emphasis>, for the implementations that
are terminating sequence of actions. For example, it is used to
implement POSIX operation on top of non-POSIX file system or even
not a file system at all, like a database for a personal audio
collection. Use constant <literal>SMB_VFS_LAYER_OPAQUE</literal> for
this mode;</listitem>
<listitem><emphasis>splitter</emphasis>, a way when some file system
activity is done in addition to the transparently calling previous
implentation. This usually involves mangling the result of that call
before returning it back to the caller. This mode is selected by
<literal>SMB_VFS_LAYER_SPLITTER</literal> constant;</listitem>
<listitem><emphasis>logger</emphasis> does not change anything or
performs any additional VFS operations. When
<emphasis>logger</emphasis> module acts, information about
operations is logged somewhere using an external facility (or
Samba's own debugging tools) but not the VFS layer. In order to
describe this type of activity use constant
<literal>SMB_VFS_LAYER_LOGGER</literal>;
</listitem>
<listitem>On contrary, <emphasis>scanner</emphasis> module does call
other VFS operations while processing the data that goes through the
system. This type of operation is indicated by the
<literal>SMB_VFS_LAYER_SCANNER</literal> constant.</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</para>
<para>Fundamentally, there are three types:
<emphasis>transparent</emphasis>, <emphasis>opaque</emphasis>, and
<emphasis>logger</emphasis>. <emphasis>Splitter</emphasis> and
<emphasis>scanner</emphasis> may confuse developers (and indeed they
are confused as our experience has shown) but this separation is to
better expose the nature of a module's actions. Most of modules
developed so far are either one of those three fundamental types with
transparent and opaque being prevalent.
</para>
<para> <para>
Each VFS operation has a vfs_op_type, a function pointer and a handle pointer in the Each VFS operation has a vfs_op_type, a function pointer and a handle
struct vfs_ops and tree macros to make it easier to call the operations. pointer in the struct vfs_ops and tree macros to make it easier to
(Take a look at <filename>include/vfs.h</filename> and <filename>include/vfs_macros.h</filename>.) call the operations. (Take a look at
<filename>include/vfs.h</filename> and
<filename>include/vfs_macros.h</filename>.)
</para> </para>
<para><programlisting> <para><programlisting>