From 1fbb3f25e972f81aa8322ca69371956789572aea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jonathan Nieder Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2011 02:40:09 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] s3-param: Make "rlimit_max below minimum Windows limit" notification less scary The fix to bug #6837 results in messages from testparm that look like a misconfiguration even though they aren't: rlimit_max: rlimit_max (8192) below minimum Windows limit (16384) Apply a slight change in wording ("increasing rlimit_max to minimum Windows limit") to make it clearer that the user has done nothing wrong. (Similarly for sysctl_max.) Reported-by: Miguel Medalha Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder Autobuild-User: Jeremy Allison Autobuild-Date: Fri Feb 25 03:56:40 CET 2011 on sn-devel-104 --- source3/param/loadparm.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/source3/param/loadparm.c b/source3/param/loadparm.c index 8a3d86731b4..284f40acc01 100644 --- a/source3/param/loadparm.c +++ b/source3/param/loadparm.c @@ -4908,7 +4908,7 @@ static int max_open_files(void) #endif if (sysctl_max < MIN_OPEN_FILES_WINDOWS) { - DEBUG(2,("max_open_files: sysctl_max (%d) below " + DEBUG(2,("max_open_files: increasing sysctl_max (%d) to " "minimum Windows limit (%d)\n", sysctl_max, MIN_OPEN_FILES_WINDOWS)); @@ -4916,7 +4916,7 @@ static int max_open_files(void) } if (rlimit_max < MIN_OPEN_FILES_WINDOWS) { - DEBUG(2,("rlimit_max: rlimit_max (%d) below " + DEBUG(2,("rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (%d) to " "minimum Windows limit (%d)\n", rlimit_max, MIN_OPEN_FILES_WINDOWS));